Conservative treatment of retinoblastoma: a prospective phase II randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by local treatments and chemothermotherapy.

PurposeIntraocular retinoblastoma treatments often combine chemotherapy and focal treatments. A first prospective protocol of conservative treatments in our institution showed the efficacy of the use of two courses of chemoreduction with etoposide and carboplatin, followed by chemothermotherapy using carboplatin as a single agent and diode laser. In order to decrease the possible long-term toxicity of chemotherapy due to etoposide, a randomized neoadjuvant phase II protocol was conducted using vincristine-carboplatin vs etoposide-carboplatin.Patients and methodsThe study was proposed when initial tumor characteristics did not allow front-line local treatments. Patients included in this phase II noncomparative randomized study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy received vincristin-carboplatin (new arm) vs etoposide-carboplatin (our reference arm). They were subsequently treated by local treatments and chemothermotherapy. Primary end point was the need for secondary enucleation or external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) not exceeding 40% at 2 years.ResultsA total of 65 eyes in 55 children were included in the study (May 2004 to August 2009). Of these, 32 eyes (27 children) were treated in the arm etoposide-carboplatin and 33 eyes (28 children) in the arm vincristin-carboplatin. At 2 years after treatment, 23/33 (69.7%) eyes were treated and salvaged without EBRT or enucleation in the arm vincristin-carboplatin and 26/32 (81.2%) in the arm etoposide-carboplatin.ConclusionEven if the two treatment arms could be considered as sufficiently active according to the study decision rules, neoadjuvant chemotherapy by two cycles of vincristine-carboplatin followed by chemothermotherapy appear to offer less optimal local control than the etoposide-carboplatin combination.

Treatment of retinoblastoma: The Institut Curie experience on a series of 730 patients (1995 to 2009).

INTRODUCTION: To describe the results of retinoblastoma treatment from 1995-2009 in a single institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of the charts of patients treated for retinoblastoma. Clinical characteristics at diagnosis, treatments and outcomes in terms of survival and ocular preservation are described. RESULTS: During the study period 826 children were referred for retinoblastoma and 730 were managed in our institution. Four hundred and eleven children presented with unilateral retinoblastoma and 319 with bilateral retinoblastoma. Median follow-up is of 93 months. Global survival is 98.5% of children, 10 children presented with second tumors, 11 children died (6 of tumor-related causes). Of the 411 children with unilateral retinoblastoma enucleation was needed at diagnosis for 324 (78.8%). Conservative treatments were attempted for 87 patients (21.2%) and ocular preservation obtained for 65 patients (74% of eyes). Three hundred and nineteen patients presented with bilateral retinoblastoma. Three hundred and ten could be treated conservatively for at least one eye. Initial intravenous chemotherapy was necessary for 75% of them. Ocular preservation without external beam radiation was possible for 221 patients (70%). The use of EBR decreased significantly after 2004 (9.1% of eyes vs 25.1%: P<0.001). DISCUSSION: Management and treatment of retinoblastoma are complex, adapted to the extent of the disease. Survival is good. Enucleation is still required for extensive ocular disease, especially for unilateral patients. Intravenous chemotherapy allows good tumor control and eye preservation and decrease the need of EBR. CONCLUSIONS: Retinoblastoma treatment with intravenous chemotherapy and ocular adjuvant therapies is very effective on the local tumor control and eye preservation.

[Prognostic factors for malignant uveal melanoma. Retrospective study on 2,241 patients and recent contribution of monosomy-3 research]. / Facteurs pronostiques du mélanome malin de l'uvée. Etude rétrospective sur 2,241 patients et apport récent de la recherche de la monosomie 3.

INTRODUCTION: We conducted a retrospective study on the clinical factors influencing the local and general prognosis of patients treated for uveal melanoma with a preliminary analysis of the prognostic value of monosomy 3. PATIENTS: and method: The patients sent to Curie Institute for uveal melanoma have a complete initial clinical evaluation, conservative management by radiotherapy or enucleation, and local and general long-term follow-up. Over the last 5 years, the status of chromosome 3 has been assessed by FISH in the tumors of enucleated patients. Findings concerning the initial workup, treatment, and follow-up are recorded prospectively. We conducted a retrospective study with multivariate analysis of the clinical factors influencing local recurrence, ocular conservation metastasis, and survival and studied the effect of monosomy 3. RESULTS: A total of 2241 patients were registered with a median follow-up of 72 months. Of these patients, 92.8% had conservative management with iodine 125 brachytherapy or proton beam therapy and 7.2% of the patients had enucleation (n=160). Tumors from 120 patients were studied for the status of chromosome 3 by FISH. The overall survival rate was 76.3% and the metastatic rate was 19.5%. The clinical factors influencing survival were the size and location of the tumor, age of the patient, gender, and initial treatment. The factors influencing the metastatic risk were the same plus retinal detachment and local recurrence. Monosomy 3 was a significant risk factor for metastatic disease. DISCUSSION: This study found the usual risk factors with the difference that location on the equator seems to be of worse prognosis than ciliary body involvement for survival and metastasis. In addition, the initial retinal detachment appears to be a risk factor for local recurrence and metastasis. At present, the evaluation of chromosome 3 is available for enucleated tumors but it could probably be done on needle biopsy performed during conservative management as well. CONCLUSION: This study confirms previous results on the prognostic factors of uveal melanoma and on the value of monosomy 3. The increasingly precise identification of a group of high-risk patients should allow us to propose adjuvant therapy and to adapt follow-up.

Combined proton beam radiotherapy and transpupillary thermotherapy for large uveal melanomas: a randomized study of 151 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Exudation from the tumour scar and glaucoma can be major problems after proton beam irradiation of uveal melanoma and can sometimes lead to secondary enucleation. We conducted a randomized study to determine whether systematic transpupillary thermotherapy (TTT) after proton beam radiotherapy could have a beneficial effect. PATIENTS AND METHOD: Between February 1999 and April 2003, all the patients treated by proton beam radiotherapy for uveal melanomas >/=7 mm thick or >/=15 mm in diameter were included in this study after giving their informed consent. One half of the patients received proton beam radiotherapy alone (60 Gy in 4 fractions) and the other half received the same dose of proton beam radiotherapy followed by TTT at 1, 6 and 12 months. All the information concerning the initial tumour parameters, treatments and follow-up was recorded and a statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: We randomized 151 patients. The median follow-up was 38 months. The 2 groups of patients were similar in terms of age, gender and tumour characteristics. The patients treated with TTT showed a greater reduction of tumour thickness (p = 0.06), less retinal detachment at the latest follow-up (p = 0.14) and a lower secondary enucleation rate (p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: The present study is the first randomized analysis to demonstrate a significant decrease in the secondary enucleation rate in patients treated with TTT after proton beam radiotherapy. Further studies should be performed to determine whether TTT could be beneficial to smaller tumours and to define its optimal dose.