RESUMEN
AIMS: Low blood 25(OH)D level is associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Additionally, individuals with prediabetes are at higher risk for CVD than individuals with normoglycemia. We investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on CVD outcomes in the vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) study, a large trial among adults with prediabetes. METHODS: 2423 participants were randomized to 4000 IU/day of vitamin D3 or placebo and followed for median 3.0 years for new-onset diabetes. In pre-specified secondary analyses, we examined the effect of vitamin D supplementation on composite Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE); expanded MACE (MACE + revascularization); atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD) risk score; and individual CVD risk factors (blood pressure, lipids, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein). Cox models compared hazard ratios (HR) between the two groups on MACE and expanded MACE. RESULTS: Mean age was 60 years, 45 % were women, 13 % had history of CVD. Twenty-one participants assigned to vitamin D and 12 participants assigned to placebo met the MACE outcome (HR 1.81, 95%CI 0.89 to 3.69). There were 27 expanded MACE outcomes in each group (HR 1.02, 95%CI, 0.59 to 1.76). There were no significant differences between vitamin D and placebo in individual CVD risk factors, but change in ASCVD risk score favored the vitamin D group (-0.45 %, 95%CI -0.75 to -0.15). CONCLUSIONS: In people with prediabetes not selected for vitamin D insufficiency and with intermediate CVD risk, vitamin D supplementation did not decrease MACE but had a small favorable effect on ASCVD risk score. TRIAL REGISTRATION: D2d ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01942694, prospectively registered September 16, 2013.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Estado Prediabético , Adulto , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Estado Prediabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Estado Prediabético/epidemiología , Factores de Riesgo , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Vitaminas/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
CONTEXT: Observational studies suggest that low vitamin D status may be a risk factor for cancer. OBJECTIVE: In a population with prediabetes and overweight/obesity that is at higher risk of cancer than the general population, we sought to determine if vitamin D supplementation lowers the risk of cancer and precancers. METHODS: The Vitamin D and type 2 diabetes (D2d) cancer outcomes study (D2dCA) is an ancillary study to the D2d study, which was conducted at 22 academic medical centers in the United States. Participants had prediabetes and overweight/obesity and were free of cancer for the previous 5 years. Participants were randomized to receive vitamin D3 4000 IU daily or placebo. At scheduled study visits (4 times/year), cancer and precancer events were identified by questionnaires. Clinical data were collected and adjudicated for all reported events. Cox proportional hazard models compared the hazard ratio (HR) of incident cancers and precancers between groups. RESULTS: Over a median follow-up period of 2.9 years, among 2385 participants (mean age 60 years and 25-hydroxyvitamin D 28 ng/mL), there were 89 cases of cancer. The HR of incident cancer for vitamin D vs placebo was 1.07 (95% CI 0.70, 1.62). Of 241 participants with incident precancers, 239 had colorectal adenomatous polyps. The HR for colorectal polyps for vitamin D vs placebo was 0.83 (95% CI 0.64, 1.07). CONCLUSION: In the D2d population of participants with prediabetes and overweight/obesity, not selected for vitamin D insufficiency, vitamin D supplementation did not have a significant effect on risk of incident cancer or colorectal polyps.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias/prevención & control , Obesidad/complicaciones , Sobrepeso/complicaciones , Estado Prediabético/complicaciones , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lesiones Precancerosas/prevención & control , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 2-hour plasma glucose (2hPG) from a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) can lead to different results when diagnosing prediabetes and diabetes. The Hemoglobin Glycation Index (HGI) quantifies the interindividual variation in glycation resulting in discrepancies between FPG and HbA1c. We used data from the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study to calculate HGI, to identify HGI-associated variables, and to determine how HGI affects prediabetes and diabetes diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS: A linear regression equation [HbA1c (%)â =â 0.0164â ×â FPG (mg/dL)â +â 4.2] was derived using the screening cohort (nâ =â 6829) and applied to calculate predicted HbA1c. This was subtracted from the observed HbA1c to determine HGI in the baseline cohort with 2hPG data (nâ =â 3945). Baseline variables plus prediabetes and diabetes diagnosis by FPG, HbA1c, and 2hPG were compared among low, moderate, and high HGI subgroups. RESULTS: The proportion of women and Black/African American individuals increased from low to high HGI subgroups. Mean FPG decreased and mean HbA1c increased from low to high HGI subgroups, consistent with the HGI calculation; however, mean 2hPG was not significantly different among HGI subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: High HGI was associated with Black race and female sex as reported previously. The observation that 2hPG was not different across HGI subgroups suggests that variation in postprandial glucose is not a significant source of population variation in HGI. Exclusive use of HbA1c for diagnosis will classify more Black individuals and women as having prediabetes compared with using FPG or 2hPG.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Glucemia/análisis , Glucemia/metabolismo , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Ayuno/sangre , Femenino , Prueba de Tolerancia a la Glucosa , Indicadores de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Prediabético/sangre , Estado Prediabético/dietoterapia , Factores de Riesgo , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Vitamina D/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Observational studies support an association between a low blood 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and the risk of type 2 diabetes. However, whether vitamin D supplementation lowers the risk of diabetes is unknown. METHODS: We randomly assigned adults who met at least two of three glycemic criteria for prediabetes (fasting plasma glucose level, 100 to 125 mg per deciliter; plasma glucose level 2 hours after a 75-g oral glucose load, 140 to 199 mg per deciliter; and glycated hemoglobin level, 5.7 to 6.4%) and no diagnostic criteria for diabetes to receive 4000 IU per day of vitamin D3 or placebo, regardless of the baseline serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level. The primary outcome in this time-to-event analysis was new-onset diabetes, and the trial design was event-driven, with a target number of diabetes events of 508. RESULTS: A total of 2423 participants underwent randomization (1211 to the vitamin D group and 1212 to the placebo group). By month 24, the mean serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level in the vitamin D group was 54.3 ng per milliliter (from 27.7 ng per milliliter at baseline), as compared with 28.8 ng per milliliter in the placebo group (from 28.2 ng per milliliter at baseline). After a median follow-up of 2.5 years, the primary outcome of diabetes occurred in 293 participants in the vitamin D group and 323 in the placebo group (9.39 and 10.66 events per 100 person-years, respectively). The hazard ratio for vitamin D as compared with placebo was 0.88 (95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 1.04; P = 0.12). The incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among persons at high risk for type 2 diabetes not selected for vitamin D insufficiency, vitamin D3 supplementation at a dose of 4000 IU per day did not result in a significantly lower risk of diabetes than placebo. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and others; D2d ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01942694.).
Asunto(s)
Colecalciferol/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Suplementos Dietéticos , Estado Prediabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitaminas/uso terapéutico , Administración Oral , Anciano , Colecalciferol/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Prediabético/sangre , Factores de Riesgo , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Vitamina D/análogos & derivados , Vitamina D/sangre , Vitaminas/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe baseline characteristics of the Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study, the first large U.S. diabetes prevention clinical trial to apply current American Diabetes Association (ADA) criteria for prediabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This is a multicenter (n = 22 sites), randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, primary prevention clinical trial testing effects of oral daily 4,000 IU cholecalciferol (D3) compared with placebo on incident diabetes in U.S. adults at risk for diabetes. Eligible participants were at risk for diabetes, defined as not meeting criteria for diabetes but meeting at least two 2010 ADA glycemic criteria for prediabetes: fasting plasma glucose (FPG) 100-125 mg/dL, 2-h postload glucose (2hPG) after a 75-g oral glucose load 140-199 mg/dL, and/or a hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) 5.7-6.4% (39-46 mmol/mol). RESULTS: A total of 2,423 participants (45% of whom were women and 33% nonwhite) were randomized to cholecalciferol or placebo. Mean (SD) age was 59 (9.9) years and BMI 32 (4.5) kg/m2. Thirty-five percent met all three prediabetes criteria, 49% met the FPG/HbA1c criteria only, 9.5% met the 2hPG/FPG criteria only, and 6.3% met the 2hPG/HbA1c criteria only. Black participants had the highest mean HbA1c and lowest FPG concentration compared with white, Asian, and other races (P < 0.01); 2hPG concentration did not differ among racial groups. When compared with previous prediabetes cohorts, the D2d cohort had lower mean 2hPG concentration but similar HbA1c and FPG concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: D2d will establish whether vitamin D supplementation lowers risk of diabetes and will inform about the natural history of prediabetes per contemporary ADA criteria.
Asunto(s)
Colecalciferol/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/prevención & control , Estado Prediabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Vitamina D/sangre , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glucemia/metabolismo , Estudios de Cohortes , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Suplementos Dietéticos , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Prediabético/sangre , Estado Prediabético/diagnóstico , Estado Prediabético/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Three 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N",N"'-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) analogues were evaluated for relative in vivo stability when radiolabeled with (111)In, (90)Y and (177)Lu and conjugated to the monoclonal antibody B72.3. The DOTA analogues evaluated were "NHS-DOTA" [N-hydroxysuccinimdyl (NHS) group activating one carboxylate], "Arm-DOTA" (also known as MeO-DOTA; with a p-NCS, o-MeO-benzyl moiety on the methylene group of one acetic acid arm) and "Back-DOTA" (with a p-NCS-benzyl moiety on a backbone methylene group of the macrocycle). The B72.3 was conjugated to the DOTA analogues to increase the retention time of the radioloabeled conjugates in vivo in mice. The serum stability of the various radiometalated DOTA conjugates showed them to have good stability out to 168 h (all >95% except (111)In-NHS-DOTA-B72.3, which was 91% stable). Hydroxyapatite stability for the (111)In and (177)Lu DOTA-conjugates was >95% at 168 h, while the (90)Y DOTA-conjugates were somewhat less stable (between 90% and 95% at 168 h). The biodistribution studies of the radiometalated DOTA-conjugates showed that no significant differences were observed for the (111)In and (177)Lu analogues; however, the (90)Y analogues showed lower stabilities, as evidenced by their increased bone uptake relative to the other two [2-20% injected dose per gram (% ID/g) for (90)Y and 2-8% ID/g for (111)In and (177)Lu]. The lower stability of the (90)Y analogues could be due to the higher beta energy of (90)Y and/or to the larger ionic radius of Y(3+). Based on the bone uptake observed, the (177)Lu-NHS-DOTA-B72.3 had slightly lower stability than the (177)Lu-Arm-DOTA-B72.3 and (177)Lu-Back-DOTA-B72.3, but not significantly at all time points. For (90)Y, the analogue showing the lowest stability based on bone uptake was (90)Y-Arm-DOTA-B72.3, perhaps because of the metal's larger ionic radius and potential steric interactions minimizing effective complexation. The (111)In analogues all showed similar biological distributions at the various time points. This study suggests that care must be taken when evaluating (90)Y-labeled antibodies and in using NHS-DOTA-antibody conjugates with (177)Lu. All evaluations should be extended to time points relevant to the half-life of the radiometal and the therapy applications.