[Effects of straw-returning combined with application of microbial inoculants on soil aggregates and related nutrients]. / ç§¸ç§†è¿˜ç”°é æ–½ä¿ƒè èŒå‰‚å¯¹åœŸå£¤å›¢èšä½“åŠå ¶å »åˆ†çš„å½±å“.

We analyzed the particle size distribution of soil aggregates in 0-20 and 20-40 cm soil layers of rice-wheat rotation field based on a field plot test with two treatments, conventional straw returning (CK) and straw returning with the addition of straw decomposition promoting microbial inoculants (IT). We evaluated the water stability indices of soil aggregates (the number of soil water stable large aggregates R0.25, the average weight diameter MWD, and the geometric average diameter GMD), and measured the contents of soil organic carbon (SOC), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) in the soil aggregates of ＜0.053, 0.053-0.25, 0.25-1, ＞1 mm. The results showed that: 1) The number of aggregates ＜0.053, 0.053-0.25, ＞0.25 mm in the 0-20 and 20-40 cm soil layers under IT decreased by 10.0% and 6.8%, increased by 3.0% and 5.7%, and 17.9% and 26.1% compared with CK, respectively. IT effectively increased R0.25, MWD, and GMD by 26.4%, 20.0%, 18.2% and 18.2%, 10.5%, 10.0% in 0-20 and 20-40 cm soil, respectively. 2) Compared to CK, the TP content of 0.25-1 mm aggregates in 0-20 and 20-40 cm soil under IT was significantly increased by 40.3% and 37.5%, respectively, without difference in TN and SOC contents. There was no significant difference in nutrient contents of the other aggregates between the treatments. The contents of SOC and TN in large aggregates (>0.25 mm) were higher than those in silty aggregates (<0.053 mm). Compared to CK, the cumulative contribution rates of SOC, TN and TP of <0.053 mm aggregates under IT were decreased in two soil layers. There was no significant difference in the nutrient cumulative contribution rates of 0.053-0.25 mm aggregates between treatments. The cumulative contribution rates of SOC, TN, and TP of large aggregates (>0.25 mm) under IT were 32.1%, 19.6%, 52.8% and 22.8%, 11.8%, 42.9% higher than those under CK in 0-20 and 20-40 cm soils, respectively. 3) The number of <0.053 mm aggregates was significantly negatively correlated with SOC and TP contents, while that of 0.053-0.25 mm aggregates was negatively correlated with nutrient content. The number of large aggregates (>0.25 mm) were significantly positively correlated with SOC, TN, and TP contents. In conclusion, straw returning with microbial-inoculant addition could promote the formation of soil macroaggregates (>0.25 mm), and improve the water stability of soil aggregates, increasing nutrient contents in soil macroaggregates, with the nutrients transferring from silty aggregates to macroaggregates.

Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy improves the survival of gastric cancer patients with ovarian metastasis and peritoneal dissemination.

The prognosis for ovarian metastasis of gastric cancer is poor. There is no currently available treatment for this disease. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in female gastric cancer patients with metachronous ovarian metastasis. From January 2000 to December 2010, 62 patients developed ovarian metastasis after undergoing gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy. Thirty-two patients underwent CRS plus HIPEC, and 30 patients underwent CRS alone. The median age of all 62 patients was 44 years (range 19-71 years). Metastatic carcinoma involving bilateral ovaries was observed in 50 patients (80.6 %). The median survival time in the CRS + HIPEC group was 15.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI] 12.1-18.9 months) but was only 10.4 months (95 % CI 8.5-12.2 months) in the CRS group (P = 0.018). Among the 32 patients with pelvic peritoneal metastasis, a stratified analysis revealed that the median survival period for the 15 patients treated with CRS + HIPEC was significantly higher than that for the patients treated with CRS alone (P = 0.046). Among the 30 patients who suffered from ovarian metastasis alone, the median survival times were similar in both groups (P = 0.141). A multivariate analysis revealed that CRS + HIPEC and a low Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) were independent predictors for improved survival. In conclusion, our study indicates that employing the HIPEC procedure after CRS could improve the survival time of patients with ovarian metastasis with few complications; however, we do not recommend HIPEC treatment for ovarian metastasis alone.