Treatment of Severe Infectious Keratitis With Scleral Contact Lenses as a Reservoir of Moxifloxacin 0.5.

PURPOSE: To report the outcomes of using scleral contact lenses as antibiotic reservoirs as a therapeutic approach in a case series of severe infectious keratitis and to discuss the clinical potential. METHODS: This was a prospective consecutive case series study of 12 eyes treated for infectious keratitis at the "Conde de Valenciana" Institute of Ophthalmology. A scleral lens (SL) filled with 0.5% moxifloxacin was used as a reservoir and replaced every 24 hours until epithelization was complete or the culture report and/or antibiogram demonstrated either a microorganism not susceptible to or resistant to moxifloxacin. RESULTS: The study included 12 eyes of 12 patients (7 women; 58.33%; average age of 63 ± 20.11 years). All patients completed at least 1 month of follow-up. Patients had a diagnosis of infectious keratitis, and the SL was fitted on initial consultation. Of the 12 eyes, 7 had culture-positive bacterial infection, 2 eyes were mycotic, and 3 eyes had no culture growth. In 3 eyes, SL was discontinued because of the lack of response (one eye) and to the presence of mycotic infection (2 eyes). All infections resolved favorably at the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The use of SLs could be an alternative for antibiotic impregnation and treatment of infectious keratitis. No complications or side effects were observed related to the use of the scleral contact lens as a reservoir for the antibiotic. This treatment modality could offer a comfortable treatment for the patient, ensuring good impregnation and maintenance of antibiotic concentrations during the 24-hour wear periods.

Combined topical and intracameral anesthesia for Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty.

To evaluate the use of combined topical and intracameral anesthesia for Descemet's stripping automated keratoplasty (DSAEK). This was a retrospective comparative cohort analysis consisting of 10 eyes in 10 consecutive patients undergoing DSAEK surgery with combined topical and intracameral anesthesia. These cases were compared with 21 randomly selected controls during the same time period undergoing DSAEK surgery performed under retrobulbar anesthesia. Incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and endothelial cell counts were compared. In all cases, DSAEK was completed without intraoperative complications. All patients tolerated the procedure well. There were 6 cases of postoperative graft dislocation requiring rebubbling, and no cases of primary failure or endophthalmitis. No significant difference in endothelial cell counts was found at final follow-up. Short-term results suggest that combined topical and intracameral anesthesia is as safe and effective for DSAEK in cooperative patients when compared to retrobulbar anesthesia. It may thereby be an alternative anesthetic modality for patients in whom retrobulbar or peribulbar anesthesia may be risky or contraindicated.