Sensitization to Gibberellin-Regulated Protein (Peamaclein) Among Italian Cypress Pollen-Sensitized Patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Peach gibberellin-regulated protein (peamaclein) has recently emerged as a relevant food allergen in cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients. Objective: We investigated monosensitization to peamaclein among Italian cypress pollen-allergic patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 835 cypress pollen-hypersensitive patients from 28 Italian allergy centers underwent a thorough work-up to determine food-allergic reactions and performed skin prick testing with a commercial peach extract containing peamaclein. IgE to rPru p 3 was measured in peach reactors, and those with negative results were enrolled as potentially monosensitized to peamaclein. IgE reactivity to rPru p 7 was evaluated using immunoblot and an experimental ImmunoCAP with rPru p 7. RESULTS: Skin prick tests were positive to peach in 163 patients (19.5%); however, 127 (77.9%) were excluded because they reacted to Pru p 3. Twenty-four patients (14.7%) corresponding to 2.8% of the entire study population) were considered potentially monosensitized to peamaclein. No geographic preference was observed. Seventeen of the 24 patients (70.8%) had a history of food allergy, mainly to peach (n=15). Additional offending foods included other Rosaceae, citrus fruits, fig, melon, tree nuts, and kiwi. On peach immunoblot, only 3 of 18 putative peamaclein-allergic patients reacted to a band at about 7 kDa; an additional 4 patients reacted at about 50-60 kDa. Ten of 18 patients (56%) had a positive result for Pru p 7 on ImmunoCAP. CONCLUSION: Allergy and sensitization to peamaclein seem rare in Italy. Most patients react to peach, although other Rosaceae fruits and several citrus fruits may also be offending foods. Peach and cypress pollen probably also share cross-reacting allergens other than peamaclein.

Molecular cloning of plane pollen allergen Pla a 3 and its utility as diagnostic marker for peach associated plane pollen allergy.

BACKGROUND: Non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTP) are considered to provoke allergic symptoms to plane tree pollen, which are frequently associated with peach allergy. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to clone the cDNA of plane pollen nsLTP Pla a 3, to characterize IgE-binding and allergenic potency of recombinant Pla a 3 in comparison to its natural counterpart and peach nsLTP Pru p 3. METHODS: Natural Pla a 3 was purified from plane pollen and analysed by mass spectrometry (MS). Recombinant Pla a 3 was characterized by SDS-PAGE and CD spectroscopy. Specific IgE to extract, components of plane pollen and Pru p 3 was measured by ImmunoCAP in sera of patients allergic to either plane pollen (n = 10), peach (n = 15) or both (n = 15). Biological potency of the proteins was investigated by in vitro mediator release assays and IgE cross-reactivity by competitive ELISA. RESULTS: Two Pla a 3 isoforms were identified. Recombinant Pla a 3 showed high purity, structural integrity, IgE-binding capacity comparable to nPla a 3 and biological potency. Sensitization to plane pollen extract was confirmed in 24/25 plane pollen allergics. The frequency of sensitization to Pla a 3 was 53% among patients allergic to both plane pollen and peach and 10% among plane pollen allergics tolerating peach where most patients were sensitized to Pla a 1. Pla a 3 and Pru p 3 showed strong bi-directional IgE cross-reactivity in patients allergic to peach and plane pollen, but not in peach allergics tolerating plane pollen. Levels of IgE-binding were generally higher to Pru p 3 than to Pla a 3. CONCLUSION: Sensitization to Pla a 3 is relevant in a subgroup of plane pollen allergics with concomitant peach allergy. IgE testing with Pla a 3 may serve as a marker to identify plane pollen allergic patients at risk of LTP-mediated food reactions and thereby improve in vitro diagnostic procedures.

IgE recognition patterns in peanut allergy are age dependent: perspectives of the EuroPrevall study.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that specific molecular sensitization patterns correlate with the clinical data/manifestation in a European peanut-allergic population characterized under a common protocol. METHODS: Sixty-eight peanut-allergic subjects and 82 tolerant controls from 11 European countries were included. Allergy to peanut and lowest symptom-eliciting dose was established by double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge in all but anaphylactic subjects. Information of early or late (before or after 14 years of age) onset of peanut allergy was obtained from standardized questionnaires. IgE to peanut allergens rAra h 1-3, 6, 8-9, profilin and CCD was determined using ImmunoCAP. RESULTS: Seventy-eight percent of peanut allergics were sensitized to peanut extract and 90% to at least one peanut component. rAra h 2 was the sole major allergen for the peanut-allergic population. Geographical differences were observed for rAra h 8 and rAra h 9, which were major allergens for central/western and southern Europeans, respectively. Sensitization to rAra h 1 and 2 was exclusively observed in early-onset peanut allergy. Peanut-tolerant subjects were frequently sensitized to rAra h 8 or 9 but not to storage proteins. Sensitization to Ara h 2 ≥ 1.0 kUA /l conferred a 97% probability for a systemic reaction (P = 0.0002). Logistic regression revealed a significant influence of peanut extract sensitization and region on the occurrence of systemic reactions (P = 0.0185 and P = 0.0436, respectively). CONCLUSION: Sensitization to Ara h 1, 2 and 3 is usually acquired in childhood. IgE to Ara h 2 ≥ 1.0 kUA /l is significantly associated with the development of systemic reactions to peanut.

Peanut allergy is common among hazelnut-sensitized subjects but is not primarily the result of IgE cross-reactivity.

BACKGROUND: Hazelnut and peanut are botanically unrelated foods, but patients are often sensitized and allergic to both, for reasons that are not well understood. METHODS: To investigate molecular cosensitization and cross-reactivity to peanut in hazelnut-sensitized individuals, children (n = 81) and adults (n = 80) were retrospectively selected based on sensitization to hazelnut. IgE to hazelnut extract, Cor a 1, 8, 9 and 14, to peanut extract, Ara h 1, 2, 3, 8 and 9, and to Bet v 1 was determined by ImmunoCAP. Allergy to hazelnut and peanut was established by DBPCFC and/or detailed clinical history. Patients were either tolerant or displayed subjective or objective symptoms to either food. IgE cross-reactivity between hazelnut and peanut storage proteins was assessed by reciprocal ImmunoCAP inhibition experiments. RESULTS: Of the 161 hazelnut-sensitized subjects, 109 (68%) were also sensitized to peanut, and 73 (45%) had clinical expression of allergy to peanut that was not associated with the presence or severity of hazelnut allergy. Instead, it was associated with IgE reactivity to peanut storage proteins, in particular Ara h 2. No cross-reactivity could be detected between Ara h 2 and Cor a 14, and 2 of 13 subjects displayed extensive cross-reactivity between 11S globulins; in plasma of both individuals, Ara h 3 almost completely inhibited IgE binding to Cor a 9. CONCLUSIONS: Peanut allergy is not primarily the result of IgE cross-reactivity to hazelnut storage proteins. IgE to Cor a 14 and Ara h 2 may serve as useful markers of primary sensitization to hazelnut and peanut, respectively.

Kinetics, cross-reactivity, and specificity of Bet v 1-specific IgG4 antibodies induced by immunotherapy with birch pollen.

BACKGROUND: IgE antibodies specific for the major birch pollen allergen frequently cross-react with Bet v 1 homologous food proteins, for example Cor a 1 in hazelnut and Mal d 1 in apple. Specific immunotherapy with birch pollen (BP-SIT) induces IgG4 antibodies that inhibit IgE binding to Bet v 1. However, information on cross-reactivity of BP-SIT-induced Bet v 1-specific IgG4 antibodies with food allergens is limited. In this study, we investigated the kinetics of production, cross-reactivity, and IgE-blocking activity of Bet v 1-specific IgG4 antibodies emerging during conventional BP-SIT and whether IgG4-epitopes overlapped with IgE epitopes. METHODS: IgE and IgG4 levels specific for Bet v 1, Mal d 1, and Cor a 1 were determined in 42 birch pollen-allergic patients before and during BP-SIT. Inhibition of IgE binding was studied by IgE-facilitated antigen-binding assays and basophil activation tests. Furthermore, inhibition of IgE-mediated activation of food allergen-reactive Bet v 1-specific T-cell lines was assessed. Competitive immunoscreening of phage-displayed peptides was applied to select mimotopes recognized by IgE and IgG4 antibodies, respectively. The resulting mimotopes were mapped on the surface of the 3D structure of the allergens using a computer-based algorithm. RESULTS: BP-SIT significantly increased Bet v 1- and food allergen-reactive IgG4 antibodies. In parallel, allergen-specific IgE levels decreased significantly. Sera containing food allergen-reactive IgG4 antibodies inhibited IgE binding, basophil activation, and IgE-mediated food allergen-induced T-cell proliferation. Predicted IgE and IgG4 epitopes on all allergens showed high overlap. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that BP-SIT may induce Bet v 1-specific IgG4 antibodies that cross-react with related food allergens and inhibit IgE binding by epitope competition.

Component-resolved in vitro diagnosis of carrot allergy in three different regions of Europe.

BACKGROUND: Carrot is a frequent cause of food allergy in Europe. The objective of this study was to evaluate a panel of carrot allergens for diagnosis of carrot allergy in Spain, Switzerland and Denmark. METHODS: Forty-nine carrot allergic patients, 71 pollen allergic but carrot-tolerant patients and 63 nonatopic controls were included. Serum IgE to carrot extract, recombinant carrot allergens (rDau c 1.0104; rDau c 1.0201; rDau c 4; the isoflavone reductase-like proteins rDau c IFR 1, rDau c IFR 2; the carrot cyclophilin rDau c Cyc) were analyzed by ImmunoCAP. RESULTS: The sensitivity of the carrot extract-based test was 82%. Use of the recombinant allergens increased the sensitivity to 90%. The Dau c 1 isoforms were major allergens for Swiss and Danish carrot allergic patients, the profilin rDau c 4 for the Spanish patients. The rDau c IFR 1 and rDau c IFR 2 were recognized by 6% and 20% of the carrot allergics, but did not contribute to a further increase of sensitivity. Among pollen allergic controls, 34% had IgE to carrot extract, 18% to each of rDau c 1.0104, rDau c 1.0201 and rDau c 4, 8% to rDau c IFR 1 and 7% to rDau c IFR 2. Sensitization to rDau c Cyc occurred in one carrot allergic patient and one nonatopic control. CONCLUSION: Component-resolved in vitro analyses revealed a significant difference in IgE sensitization pattern between geographical regions and in the prevalence of sensitization to carrot components between carrot allergic and carrot-tolerant but pollen sensitized patients.

Enhancement of hazelnut extract for IgE testing by recombinant allergen spiking.

BACKGROUND: Hazelnuts are a common cause of food allergic reactions. Most hazelnut allergic individuals in central and northern Europe are sensitized to Cor a 1, a member of the PR-10 protein family, while the lipid transfer protein Cor a 8 acts as a major allergen in the south of Europe. Other allergens, including profilin and seed storage proteins, may be important in subgroups of patients. Reliable detection of specific IgE in the clinical diagnosis of food allergy requires allergen reagents with a sufficient representation of all relevant allergen components. Some reported observations suggest that natural hazelnut extract may not be fully adequate in this respect. METHODS: The capacity of immobilized natural hazelnut extract to bind Cor a 1-, Cor a 2- and Cor a 8-specific IgE and IgG antibodies was investigated by serum adsorption and extract dilution experiments and by the use of allergen specific rabbit antisera. All measurements were performed with the ImmunoCAP assay platform. RESULTS: The experimental results revealed an incomplete capacity of immobilized hazelnut extract to capture IgE antibodies directed to the major allergen Cor a 1. Spiking of hazelnut extract with recombinant Cor a 1.04 prior to solid phase coupling gave rise to significantly enhanced IgE antibody binding from Cor a 1 reactive sera. The spiking did not negatively affect the measurement of IgE to extract components other than Cor a 1. CONCLUSION: A hazelnut allergen reagent with enhanced IgE detection capacity can be generated by supplementing the natural food extract with recombinant Cor a 1.04.

Cloning, expression and immunological characterization of full-length timothy grass pollen allergen Phl p 4, a berberine bridge enzyme-like protein with homology to celery allergen Api g 5.

BACKGROUND: Timothy grass pollen is a common cause of respiratory allergy in the temperate regions. The major group 4 allergen, Phl p 4, has previously been purified and studied biochemically and immunologically, but has so far not been produced and characterized as a recombinant protein. OBJECTIVE: To clone and characterize timothy grass pollen allergen Phl p 4. METHODS: Full-length Phl p 4 cDNA was cloned using a PCR-based strategy including 3'-and 5'-RACE. Recombinant Phl p 4 was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified by immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography. Its immunological activity was investigated using experimental ImmunoCAP tests, sera from Phl p 4 sensitized individuals and Phl p 4 reactive polyclonal and monoclonal animal antibodies. RESULTS: Five full-length Phl p 4 cDNA clones were analysed. Sequence deviations between the clones were present at nine amino acid positions, and the consensus sequence comprised an open reading frame of 525 amino acids, including a predicted 25-residue signal peptide. The calculated molecular weight of the deduced mature protein was 55.6 kDa and the isoelectric point 9.9, both consistent with previously observed properties of purified nPhl p 4. Close sequence similarity was found to genomic clones from several other Pooideae grass species and to Bermuda grass pollen allergen BG60. Further, similarity was found to members of the berberine bridge enzyme (BBE) family, including celery allergen Api g 5. Recombinant Phl p 4 bound specific immunoglobulin (Ig)E from 31 of 32 nPhl p 4-reactive sera, and the IgE binding to rPhl p 4 could be inhibited by nPhl p 4 in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSIONS: Full-length Phl p 4 cDNA was cloned and showed sequence similarity to members of the BBE family. Recombinant Phl p 4 was produced and shared epitopes with natural Phl p 4.

Molecular and immunological characterization of a novel timothy grass (Phleum pratense) pollen allergen, Phl p 11.

BACKGROUND: Allergy to grass pollen is typically associated with serum IgE antibodies to group 1 and/or group 5 allergens, and additionally often to one or several less prominent allergens. Most of the grass pollen allergens identified to date have been characterized in detail by molecular, biochemical and immunological methods, timothy grass being one of the most thoroughly studied species. However, a 20-kDa allergen frequently recognized by IgE antibodies from grass pollen allergics has so far escaped cloning and molecular characterization. OBJECTIVE: To clone and characterize the 20 kDa timothy grass pollen allergen Phl p 11. METHODS: Phl p 11 cDNA was cloned by PCR techniques, utilizing N-terminal amino acid sequence obtained from the natural allergen. Phl p 11 was expressed as a soluble fusion protein in Escherichia coli, purified to homogeneity and used for serological analysis and to study Phl p 11 specific induction of histamine release from basophils and skin reactivity in sensitized and control subjects. RESULTS: Phl p 11 cDNA defined an acidic polypeptide of 15.8 kDa with homology to pollen proteins from a variety of plant species and to soybean trypsin inhibitor. The sequence contained one potential site for N-linked glycosylation. Serological analysis revealed that recombinant Phl p 11 shared epitopes for human IgE antibodies with the natural protein and bound serum IgE from 32% of grass pollen-sensitized subjects (n = 184). Purified recombinant Phl p 11 elicited skin reactions and dose-dependent histamine release from basophils of sensitized subjects, but not in non-allergic controls. CONCLUSION: As the first representative of group 11 grass pollen allergens, Phl p 11 has been cloned and produced as a recombinant protein showing allergenic activity. One-third of grass pollen-sensitized subjects showed specific IgE reactivity to recombinant Phl p 11, corresponding in magnitude to a significant proportion of specific IgE to grass pollen extract.

Induction of antibody responses to new B cell epitopes indicates vaccination character of allergen immunotherapy.

Whether the modulation of antibody responses can contribute to the improvement of clinical symptoms in patients receiving allergen immunotherapy represents a controversial issue. We have used purified [seven recombinant (r) and one natural] timothy grass pollen allergens as well as recombinant B cell epitope-containing fragments of the major timothy grass pollen allergen, Phl p 1, to investigate humoral immune responses in eight allergic patients receiving grass pollen-specific immunotherapy. We found that the administration of aluminium hydroxide-adsorbed grass pollen extract induced complex changes in allergen/epitope-specific antibody responses: increases in IgG subclass (IgG1, IgG2, IgG4) responses against allergens recognized before the therapy were observed. All eight patients started to mount IgE and IgG4 responses to continuous Phl p 1 epitopes not recognized before the therapy and a de novo induction of IgE antibodies against new allergens was found in one patient. Evidence for a protective role of IgG antibodies specific for continuous Phl p 1 epitopes was provided by the demonstration that preincubation of rPhl p 1 with human serum containing therapy-induced Phl p 1-specific IgG inhibited rPhl p 1-induced histamine release from basophils of a grass pollen-allergic patient. Our finding that immunotherapy induced antibody responses against previously not recognized B cell epitopes indicates the vaccination character of this treatment. The fact that patients started to mount de novo IgE as well as protective IgG responses against epitopes may explain the unpredictability of specific immunotherapy performed with allergen extracts and emphasizes the need for novel forms of component-resolved immunotherapy.

Different profiles in specific IgE to rBet v 1 and rBet v 2 in patients allergic to birch pollen from six countries.

There are differences in IgE reactivity to rBet v 1 and rBet v 2 among allergic patients from the six countries studied. The complexity of the reactivity profile tends to be greater in individuals from the central/southern parts of Europe compared to Sweden and Finland. There is a good agreement between in vitro diagnosis with Pharmacia CAP System and Skin prick testing when using the same reagents, rBet v 1 and rBet v 2.