Radiotherapy for brain metastases near the end of life in an integrated health care system.

BACKGROUND: To examine radiotherapy (RT) patterns-of-care and utilization at the end of life (EOL) among non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with brain metastasis (BrM) in an integrated health care system. METHODS: Central tumor registry identified 5,133 patients diagnosed with NSCLC from 2007-2011. BrM were determined by imaging. Patient and clinical characteristics were obtained by chart abstraction. In addition to abstracted variables, graded prognostic assessment (GPA) score of 0-1 was derived by collected data and tested as a predictor of death within 14 or 30 days of RT. RESULTS: On NSCLC presentation, 10% harbored BrM while 7% developed BrM thereafter. Of 900 BrM patients, 15% were not referred for RT, with median time to death of 21 days. Median time to death for 5% not recommended RT was 48 days. Among those receiving brain RT, 11.9% died within 14 days and 23.3% (cumulatively) died within 30 days of treatment. Over 50% with GPA score 0-1 received RT, 11% within 14 days and 21% within 30 days of death; median survival of GPA score 0-1 patients was 49 days. GPA score 0-1 independently predicted for death within 30 days of RT receipt. CONCLUSIONS: BrM are common in NSCLC, and most patients are referred for brain RT. A surprising proportion of patients received treatment near the EOL, as 23% died within 30 days of RT. GPA score of 0-1 predicted for death within 30 days of treatment. RT referral, recommendation, and timing should be better tailored to life expectancy, and additional benchmarks for quality of care are needed.

Chemoradiotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal: Comparison of one versus two cycles mitomycin-C.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and mitomycin-C (MMC) is standard treatment for anal cancer. Randomized clinical trials in Europe have used 1 cycle MMC, while North American studies use 2 cycles. We compared treatment outcomes between patients treated with either 1 or 2 cycles of concurrent MMC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 217 consecutive patients were treated definitively with chemoradiation from 2004 to 2012 in an integrated health system. Concurrent chemotherapy regimen depended on individual practice, and consisted of 2 cycles 5-FU (1000 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-4 and 29-32), along with MMC (10-15 mg/m(2)), given on either day 1 alone (n = 154), or days 1 and 29 (n = 63). Outcomes included progression-free (PFS), cancer-specific (CSS), overall (OS), and colostomy-free survival (CFS), as well as toxicity criteria. RESULTS: Median age 60 years, 70% female, 52% T3-T4, and 40% node-positive. Median follow-up 26 months. At 2 years, outcomes were: PFS 80%, CSS 89%, OS 86%, and CFS 88%. There was no difference in PFS (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.37-1.92), CSS (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.07-1.42), OS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.25-1.83), or CFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.31-2.67) between the MMC1 and MMC2 groups. Stage and male gender were predictive of worse outcomes. Acute grade ⩾ 2 toxicities were worse in the MMC2 group. There were 3 treatment-related deaths, all in the MMC2 group. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that MMC1 is efficacious and may be an alternative to MMC2 in patients with anal cancer treated with definitive chemoradiation, with the potential for less acute treatment-related toxicity. Randomized trials comparing these two regimens could be considered.