Deductive development and validation of a questionnaire to assess sensitivity to very low and very high frequency sounds: SISUS-Q (Sensitivity to Infra-Sound and Ultra-Sound Questionnaire).

OBJECTIVE: Auditory research and complaints about environmental noise indicate that there exists a significant, small subgroup within the population which is sensitive towards infra- and low-frequency or ultra- and high-frequency sounds (ILF/UHF). This paper reports on the development, factorization and validation of measures of sensitivity towards frequencies outside the common hearing range. DESIGN: A multinational, cross-sectional survey study was run. Principal component analyses and exploratory factor analyses were conducted in a sample of 267 Europeans (from the UK, Slovenia, and Germany). RESULTS: The factor analyses suggested that ILF versus UHF sensitivity constitute different factors, each characterized by sensory perception, stress-responsivity, and behavioral avoidance. A third factor comprising beliefs of dangerousness of ILF and UHF emerged. The factors explained 72% of the variance. The factor-solution was replicated separately for the English (n = 98) and German (n = 169) versions of the questionnaire (Slovenians and UK residents filled out the English version). Acceptable to excellent reliability was found. ILF and UHF sensitivity were moderately related to noise sensitivity in the normal hearing range, suggesting the new measures are not redundant. Correlations with psychiatric and somatic symptoms were small to moderate. ILF sensitivity correlated with neuroticism (small effect) and daytime sleepiness (moderate effect). ILF and UHF sensitivity were related to agreeableness (small effects). Overall, the novel ILF and UHF sensitivity scales seems to provide a solid tool for conducting further research on the role of sensitivity concerning adverse effects of ILF and UHF sound (e.g. health outcomes, annoyance ratings). The questionnaire consortium recommends using the new scales in combination with established measures of normal hearing range sensitivity.

Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on cochlear tuning measured using stimulus frequency and distortion product OAEs.

OBJECTIVE: To study whether a change in cochlear tuning, measured using OAEs, could be detected due to contralateral activation of the efferent system using broadband noise. DESIGN: Cochlear tuning measures based on SFOAE phase gradients and SFOAE-2TS 'Q' were used to test this hypothesis. SFOAE magnitude and phase gradient were measured using a pure-tone sweep from 1248 to 2496 Hz at 50 dB SPL. 2TS curves of SFOAE were recorded with a suppressor frequency swept from 1120 to 2080 Hz at 50 dB SPL. DPOAE f2-sweep phase gradient was also obtained to allow comparisons with the literature. All three assays were performed across with- and no-CAS conditions. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-two young, normal-hearing adults. RESULTS: CAS did not produce a statistically significant change in the tuning metric in any of the OAE methods used, despite producing significant reductions in the OAE magnitude. CONCLUSION: It is unknown whether this insensitivity to CAS is due to an insensitivity of these three measures to cochlear mechanical tuning. The results suggest that any changes in tuning induced by CAS that may occur are small and difficult to detect using the OAE measurement paradigms used here.

Investigating the wave-fixed and place-fixed origins of the 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission within a micromechanical cochlear model.

The 2f(1)-f(2) distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) arises within the cochlea due to the nonlinear interaction of two stimulus tones (f(1) and f(2)). It is thought to comprise contributions from a wave-fixed source and a place-fixed source. The generation and transmission of the 2f(1)-f(2) DPOAE is investigated here using quasilinear solutions to an elemental model of the human cochlea with nonlinear micromechanics. The micromechanical parameters and nonlinearity are formulated to match the measured response of the cochlea to single- and two-tone stimulation. The controlled introduction of roughness into the active micromechanics of the model allows the wave- and place-fixed contributions to the DPOAE to be studied separately. It is also possible to manipulate the types of nonlinear suppression that occur within the quasilinear model to investigate the influence of stimulus parameters on DPOAE generation. The model predicts and explains a variety of 2f(1)-f(2) DPOAE phenomena: The dependence of emission amplitude on stimulus parameters, the weakness of experiments designed to quantify cochlear amplifier gain, and the predominant mechanism which gives rise to DPOAE fine structure. In addition, the model is used to investigate the properties of the wave-fixed source and how these properties are influenced by the stimulus parameters.

The effect of stimulus rate and time-separation on Volterra slices of otoacoustic emissions.

Volterra slices (VSs) of otoacoustic emissions are temporal non-linear interaction components which can be measured using the maximum length sequence technique of stimulation. Previous studies have found, but not explained, non-monotonic variations in the amplitude of VSs when stimulus rate is increased. In this study, a simple phenomenological model is investigated which provided possible insights into the effect of rate on VS amplitudes. Resulting theoretical considerations suggest that the effect of rate on VS amplitude is best examined when the time-separation parameter of the VS is held constant. To test these suggestions, data on VSs of order 2 and 3 were measured in 24 normal hearing ears in which the rate is varied while holding constant the time-separation. Under these conditions, the results reveal a monotonic reduction in the amplitude of the VSs with increasing rate. The phenomenological model offers a possible explanation of some of these results in terms of the derivatives of the input-output function of the non-linearity. In addition, measured cross-correlations between waveforms of VS of different order and slice number were obtained, revealing a complex dependence on time-separation that has not been explained.

Click-evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) recorded from neonates under 13 hours old using conventional and maximum length sequence (MLS) stimulation.

Maximum length sequence (MLS) stimulation allows click evoked otoacoustic emissions (CEOAEs) to be averaged at very high stimulation rates. This enables a faster reduction of noise contamination of the response, and has been shown to improve the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of CEOAEs recorded from adult subjects. This study set out to investigate whether MLS averaging can enhance the SNR of CEOAEs recorded in newborns within the first day after birth, and so improve the pass rates for OAE screening in this period, when false alarm rates are very high. CEOAEs were recorded in a neonatal ward from 57 ears in 37 newborns ranging from 6 to 13h old, using both conventional (50/s) and high rate (5000/s) MLS averaging. SNR values and pass rates were compared for responses obtained within equal recording times at both rates. MLS averaging produced an SNR improvement of up to 3.8dB, with the greatest improvement found in higher frequency bands. This SNR advantage resulted in pass rate improvement between 5% and 10%, depending on pass criterion. A significant effect of age was found on both SNR and pass rate, with newborns between 6 and 10h old showing significantly lower values than those tested between 10 and 13h after birth, as well as a much greater improvement due to MLS averaging. The findings show that MLS averaging can reduce false alarm rates by up to 15% in very young neonates in a neonatal ward setting.