Weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin (LV) and bimonthly cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: A phase II clinical trial was performed to evaluate the activity and toxicity of bimonthly cisplatin and weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From September 1997 to March 1998, 23 chemo-naive patients of advanced gastric cancer were enrolled in this study. The regimen consisted of weekly 24-h infusion of 5-FU (2,600 mg/m2) and LV 150 mg and bimonthly cisplatin (25-50 mg/m2) bolus for 12 weeks followed by a 2-week break. RESULTS: There were 10 male and 13 female patients with a median age of 52 years. A total of 428 chemotherapy treatments were given with a mean of 11. Seventeen patients were evaluable for response. There were 41% (7/17) partial response, 18% (3/17) stable disease and 41% (7/17) progressive disease. The grade III or IV toxicity included anorexia 35% (8/23), fatigue 26% (6/23), vomiting 17% (4/23) and mucositis 9% (2/23). One patient developed perforated duodenal stump after chemotherapy. One patient died of hyperammonemia-related coma. The median times to disease progression and overall survival were 3.5 and 7 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen showed modest activity against gastric cancer. However, there was no survival advantage and there was greater toxicity than with weekly high-dose 5-FU-LV alone.

Weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-flurouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

The effect of biochemical modulation of weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 24 h infusion by leucovorin (LV) in the treatment of 39 consecutive patients with advanced gastric cancer without prior chemotherapy from October 1996 to August 1997 was examined. There were 21 male and 18 female patients with a median age of 56 years. The regimen consisted of 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 and LV 150 mg administered by 24 h infusion weekly for 6 weeks followed by a 2 week break. The treatment was repeated every 8 weeks until disease progression, patient refusal or unacceptable toxicity. Placement of a central vascular device and a portable external infusion pump was required in all patients and was used for outpatient treatment. The response to treatment was evaluated every 8 weeks. A total of 395 chemotherapy treatments were given with a mean of 10 (2-24). This response rate was: 33% (12 of 36) partial response (PR) rate, 33% (12 of 36) stable disease (SD) and 33% (12 of 36) progressive disease (PD). In general, the toxicity was mild but two toxic deaths occurred, one due to neutropenic sepsis and the other due to hyperammonemia. The median time to progression was 4 months. The overall median survival was 7 months. The survivals of the PR, SD and PD were 12, 8 and 5 months, respectively. This regimen showed a modest activity against gastric cancer with acceptable toxicity. Weekly 24 h infusion of high-dose 5-FU with LV in an outpatient setting for patients with gastric cancer is feasible and deserves further study as a basis for combination therapy.

Clinical benefit and response in patients with gastric cancer to weekly 24-hour infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV).

BACKGROUND: A prospective study evaluated the efficacy and correlation of different outcome measurements, including the WHO response criteria and clinical benefit (CB), to weekly high-dose 5-FU and LV for patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine chemotherapy-naive patients were enrolled from Sep. 1996 to Oct. 1997. The treatment consisted of a 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 & LV 150 mg weekly for 6 weeks with a subsequent 2-week break. The responses were evaluated by CB and WHO criteria at the end of the 8th week, then at 8-week intervals. RESULTS: There were 21 male and 18 female patients with a median age of 56 years. The median Karnofsky performance score was 70%. Thirty-six patients were evaluable for WHO criteria, and 12 (33.3%) had partial response, 12 (33.3%) had stable disease and 12 (33.3%) had progressive disease. Twenty-one of the 35 (60%) evaluable patients for CB were found to have a positive response. There was a significant correlation between WHO response and CB. The median survival was 10.5 months for CB responders, while the median survival among the CB non-responders was 5 months only. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that this regimen yielded a 60% CB, despite a 33% WHO response rate. Improvement in CB resulted in an improvement in survival as well as the correlation between CB and WHO response, and suggested the value of CB as an alternative indicator for clinical response.