Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Artículo en Chino | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37640993

RESUMEN

Objective:To analyze the risk factors that affect the prognosis of patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma(HPSCC) and to compare the efficacy of surgical resection followed by adjuvant radiotherapy(SR) with that of neoadjuvant therapy consisting of platinum-based chemotherapy and fluorouracil combined with either cetuximab or nimotuzumab, followed by SR. The study also aimed to evaluate the overall survival(OS) of patients, their postoperative eating function, tracheostomy decannulation rate, and tumor response to the two neoadjuvant chemotherapies. Methods:A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of HPSCC patients who received SR or neoadjuvant therapy followed by SR treatment at the Shanghai General Hospital from 2012 to 2019 and had not undergone any prior treatment. The prognostic factors were analyzed, and the survival analysis of patients who underwent SR treatment with two neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens was performed. Results:A total of 108 patients were included in the study. The results of the univariate analysis showed that gender(P=0.850) had no significant correlation with the survival rate of HPSCC patients who underwent SR. However, age, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio(PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR), T stage, N stage, neoadjuvant therapy with either cetuximab or nimotuzumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy and fluorouracil, and histological grade were significantly associated with prognosis(P<0.05). The multivariate analysis revealed that smoking history, histological grade, and neoadjuvant therapy with either cetuximab or nimotuzumab combined with platinum-based chemotherapy and fluorouracil were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of HPSCC(P<0.05). Patients who received neoadjuvant therapy had longer OS than those who underwent SR only(P<0.001). There was no significant difference in tumor response to the two neoadjuvant therapies and in OS(P>0.05), and there was no significant difference in the rate of oral feeding and tracheostomy decannulation among the three treatment groups(P>0.05). Conclusion:Univariate analysis showed that age at tumor onset, smoking history, alcohol consumption history, NLR, PLR, T stage, N stage, whether receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and pathological grade were associated with the prognosis of HPSCC patients receiving SR treatment. Multivariate analysis showed that smoking history, pathological grade, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy were independent risk factors affecting the prognosis. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cetuximab or nimotuzumab can prolong the OS of patients, providing a certain basis and reference for the treatment of HPSCC.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello , Cetuximab/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , China , Pronóstico , Fluorouracilo
2.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 67(14): 1661-71, 2016 Apr 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27012778

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The COGENT (Clopidogrel and the Optimization of Gastrointestinal Events Trial) showed that proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) safely reduced rates of gastrointestinal (GI) events in patients requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). However, utilization of appropriate prophylactic PPI therapy remains suboptimal, especially with low-dose aspirin. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated the safety and efficacy of PPI therapy in patients receiving DAPT in low- and high-dose aspirin subsets. METHODS: Randomized patients with available aspirin dosing information in COGENT (N = 3,752) were divided into "low-dose" (≤ 100 mg) and "high-dose" (>100 mg) aspirin groups. The primary GI and cardiovascular endpoints were composite upper GI events and major adverse cardiac events, respectively. All events were adjudicated by independent, blinded gastroenterologists and cardiologists. RESULTS: Median duration of follow-up was 110 days. Low-dose aspirin users (n = 2,480; 66.1%) were more likely to be older, female, and have higher rates of peripheral artery disease, prior stroke, and hypertension, whereas high-dose aspirin users (n = 1,272; 33.9%) had higher rates of hyperlipidemia, smoking, a history of percutaneous coronary intervention, and were more than twice as likely to be enrolled from sites within the United States (80.4% vs. 39.8%). High-dose aspirin was associated with similar 180-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of adjudicated composite GI events (1.7% vs. 2.1%; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.88; 95% confidence interval: 0.46 to 1.66) and major adverse cardiac events (4.8% vs. 5.5%; adjusted hazard ratio: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.48 to 1.11) compared with low-dose aspirin. Randomization to PPI therapy reduced 180-day Kaplan-Meier estimates of the primary GI endpoint in low-dose (1.2% vs. 3.1%) and high-dose aspirin subsets (0.9% vs. 2.6%; p for interaction = 0.80), and did not adversely affect the primary cardiovascular endpoint in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Gastroprotection with PPI therapy should be utilized in appropriately selected patients with coronary artery disease requiring DAPT, even if the patients are on low-dose aspirin. (Clopidogrel and the Optimization of Gastrointestinal Events Trial [COGENT]; NCT00557921).


Asunto(s)
Aspirina/administración & dosificación , Omeprazol/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de la Bomba de Protones/uso terapéutico , Ticlopidina/análogos & derivados , Anciano , Aspirina/efectos adversos , Clopidogrel , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Dispepsia/inducido químicamente , Dispepsia/prevención & control , Femenino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/prevención & control , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/inducido químicamente , Obstrucción Intestinal/prevención & control , Perforación Intestinal/inducido químicamente , Perforación Intestinal/prevención & control , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Revascularización Miocárdica/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/inducido químicamente , Dolor/prevención & control , Úlcera Péptica/inducido químicamente , Úlcera Péptica/prevención & control , Inhibidores de Agregación Plaquetaria/efectos adversos , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Ticlopidina/administración & dosificación , Ticlopidina/efectos adversos
3.
BMC Surg ; 14: 28, 2014 May 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24886449

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has become the treatment of choice for gallbladder lesions, but it is not a pain-free procedure. This study explored the pain relief provided by combined wound and intraperitoneal local anesthetic use for patients who are undergoing LC. METHODS: Two-hundred and twenty consecutive patients undergoing LC were categorized into 1 of the following 4 groups: local wound anesthetic after LC either with an intraperitoneal local anesthetic (W + P) (group 1) or without an intraperitoneal local anesthetic (W + NP) (group 2), or no local wound anesthetic after LC either with intraperitoneal local anesthetic (NW + P) (group 3) or without an intraperitoneal local anesthetic (NW + NP) (group 4). A visual analog scale (VAS) was used to assess postoperative pain. The amount of analgesic used and the duration of hospital stay were also recorded. RESULTS: The VAS was significantly lower immediately after LC for the W + P group than for the NW + NP group (5 vs. 6; p = 0.012). Patients in the W + P group received a lower total amount of meperidine during their hospital stay. They also had the shortest hospital stay after LC, compared to the patients in the other groups. CONCLUSION: Combined wound and intraperitoneal local anesthetic use after LC significantly decreased the immediate postoperative pain and may explain the reduced use of meperidine and earlier discharge of patients so treated.


Asunto(s)
Amidas/administración & dosificación , Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amidas/uso terapéutico , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Parenterales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Ropivacaína , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
World J Gastroenterol ; 15(19): 2376-80, 2009 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19452582

RESUMEN

AIM: To investigate the effect of pain relief after infusion of ropivacaine at port sites at the end of surgery. METHODS: From October 2006 to September 2007, 72 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) were randomized into two groups of 36 patients. One group received ropivacaine infusion at the port sites at the end of LC and the other received normal saline. A visual analog scale was used to assess postoperative pain when the patient awakened in the operating room, 6 and 24 h after surgery, and before discharge. The amount of analgesics use was also recorded. The demographics, laboratory data, hospital stay, and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: There was no difference between the two groups preoperatively in terms of demographic and laboratory data. After surgery, similar operation time, blood loss, and no postoperative morbidity and mortality were observed in the two groups. However, a significantly lower pain score was observed in the patients undergoing LC with local anesthesia infusion at 1 h after LC and at discharge. Regarding analgesic use, the amount of meperidine used 1 h after LC and the total used during admission were lower in patients undergoing LC with local anesthesia infusion. This group also had a shorter hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Local anesthesia with ropivacaine at the port site in LC patients significantly decreased postoperative pain immediately. This explains the lower meperidine use and earlier discharge for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Amidas/uso terapéutico , Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locales/uso terapéutico , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Amidas/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intralesiones , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Ropivacaína , Cloruro de Sodio/administración & dosificación , Cloruro de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
Langenbecks Arch Surg ; 393(6): 849-55, 2008 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18712409

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective and case-controlled study to evaluate the impact of supplement of alanyl-glutamine dipeptide (Gln) in parenteral nutrition on perioperative immune and nutritional changes and clinical outcomes for patients undergoing gastrointestinal (GI) operations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 2006, 70 patients undergoing GI surgeries were allocated equally into two groups. One group received regular parenteral nutrition and the other received the same formulation and supplemented with the Gln; the two groups were isonitrogenous. The infusion was started from 1 day before operation to the sixth day after operation for 7 days. Blood samples were collected on the morning of the day before the operation and on the morning 6 days after the operation and analyzed for immune and nutrition parameters. RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups in terms of clinical characteristics, operative procedures, biochemistry, nutritional status, and immune status preoperatively. After GI surgery, significant reduction in nutritional and immune parameters were observed in both groups, demonstrated by significant difference of albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), lymphocyte count, T cell, and CD8 cell. The length of hospital stay is slightly longer in the control group patients, but not to statistical significance (16.3 +/- 21.3 versus 12.2 +/- 6.8 days, p = 0.299). In terms of morbidity, there was no difference between the two groups, but two patients in the control group had wound infection; none was noted in the Gln group (p = 1.0). No surgical mortality was noted in this study. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative parenteral nutrition supplemented with Gln is beneficial for patients undergoing GI surgery. Gln supplementation significantly attenuated postoperative inflammation and ameliorated postoperative immunodepression as well as nutritional depression in GI surgery.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/cirugía , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/cirugía , Dipéptidos/administración & dosificación , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/inmunología , Enfermedades del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/inmunología , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/mortalidad , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Mediadores de Inflamación/sangre , Infusiones Intravenosas , Tiempo de Internación , Recuento de Linfocitos , Subgrupos Linfocitarios/inmunología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/inmunología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA