Troglitazone increases the resistance of low density lipoprotein to oxidation in healthy volunteers.

The oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein is of importance in atherogenesis. Antioxidant supplementation has been shown, in published work, to increase low density lipoprotein resistance to oxidation in both healthy subjects and diabetic subjects; in animal studies a contemporary reduction in atherogenesis has been demonstrated. Troglitazone is a novel oral antidiabetic drug which has similarities in structure with vitamin E. The present study assessed the effect of troglitazone 400 mg twice daily for 2 weeks on the resistance of low density lipoprotein to oxidation in healthy male subjects. Ten subjects received troglitazone and ten received placebo in a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group design. The lag phase (a measure of the resistance of low density lipoprotein to oxidation) was determined by measurement of fluorescence development during copper-catalysed oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein. The lag phase was increased by 27 % (p < 0.001) at week 1 and by 24% (p < 0.001) at week 2 in the troglitazone treated group compared with the placebo group. A number of variables known to influence the resistance of low density lipoprotein to oxidation were measured. They included macronutrient consumption, plasma and lipoprotein lipid profile, alpha-tocopherol, beta-carotene levels in low density lipoprotein, low density lipoprotein particle size, mono and polyunsaturated fatty acid content of low density lipoprotein and pre-formed low density lipoprotein hydroperoxide levels in low density lipoprotein. Troglitazone was associated with a significant reduction in the amount of pre-formed low density lipoprotein lipid hydroperoxides. At weeks 1 and 2, the low density lipoprotein hydroperoxide content was 17% (p < 0.05) and 18% (p < 0.05) lower in the troglitazone group compared to placebo, respectively. In summary the increase in lag phase duration in the troglitazone group appeared to be due to the compound's activity as an antioxidant and to its ability to reduce the amount of preformed low density lipoprotein lipid hydroperoxides. This antioxidant activity could provide considerable benefit to diabetic patients where atherosclerosis accounts for the majority of total mortality.

Acute effects of deflazacort and prednisone on rates of mineralization and bone formation.

The aims of this study were to determine (1) whether acute suppression of bone formation could be evaluated after the administration of corticosteroids in man by quantitative bone histomorphometry; and (2) whether there were significant differences between the effects of prednisone and its analog deflazacort. Thirteen patients who needed high-dose corticosteroid therapy were randomly allocated to two groups of treatment (prednisone or deflazacort). Quantitative bone histomorphometry, using the technique of triple labeling, and biochemical measurements of bone turnover were studied. There were no differences in biochemical indices of bone turnover between prednisone and deflazacort at the beginning and end of the 15 days of treatment course. During corticosteroid treatment, there were no significant changes in biochemical indices of bone turnover but a significant decline in total alkaline phosphatase (P < 0.01). Histomorphometric indices, as revealed by measurements of tetracycline interval and extent of labeling, showed no significant differences in either mineral apposition rate or bone formation rate in the two groups. We conclude that the acute glucocorticoid suppression of bone turnover by glucocorticoids is not detectable within the first 2 weeks of treatment by histomorphometric techniques. No differences in bone effects of prednisone and deflazacort were detected in this short-term study.

The acute-phase response after bisphosphonate administration.

In patients who have never previously received bisphosphonate therapy, the intravenous administration of 4-amino-1-hydroxybuthilidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (AHButBP), 3-amino-1-hydroxypropylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (AHPrBP), or 6-amino-1-hydroxyhexylidene-1,1-bisphosphonate (AHHexBP) induced an acute-phase response (APR) irrespective of the underlying disease, manifested by a fall in circulating lymphocyte number and serum zinc concentration and in a rise in C-reactive protein (CRP); a febrile reaction occurred in 30% of the patients. The APR was maximally expressed within 28-36 hours of i.v. administration of the bisphosphonates and disappeared 2-3 days later despite continuous treatment. These effects were dose dependent and the lowest doses necessary for an APR were 10 mg of AHButBP and AHPrBP and 75 mg of AHHexBP. Doses up to 1,000 mg/day i.v. of dichloromethanebisphosphonate (Cl2MBP) were devoid of these side effects. In patients treated with either a single i.v. dose of amino-bisphosphonates which resulted in an APR or with a suboptimal dose, a subsequent challenge 12-160 days later of the high dose failed to cause a rise in CRP or a fall in the lymphocyte count. The desensitization to AHButBP or AHPrBP was also seen following pretreatment with Cl2MBP. These findings suggest that bisphosphonates interact with macrophage-like cells resident in the skeleton and stimulate interleukin-1 release which is responsible for the appearance of the APR. At the same time, however, the bisphosphonates render these cells insensitive to further stimulation for several months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Simultaneous measurement of 1.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D, 24.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D and 25-hydroxy-vitamin D from a single two milliliters serum specimen. Preliminary clinical application.

A simple method for extraction, purification and separation of the principal vitamin D metabolites from a single serum sample is described. The method involved extraction of serum with acetonitrile followed by a first purification employing C-18 Sep-pak cartridges eluted with methanol/water and acetonitrile. Final separation before assay was carried out by high pressure liquid chromatography. 1.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D was measured with radioimmunoassay using an antiserum (S11) with high selectivity for 1 alpha-OH function of the hormone at a final dilution of 1:100,000. 24.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D and 25-hydroxy-vitamin D were measured employing a competitive binding assay with normal rat serum at a final dilution of 1:10,000 as source of binding protein. The mean (+/- SD) serum 1.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D, 24.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D and 25-hydroxy-vitamin D concentrations for a group of healthy subjects were 50.4 +/- 17.3 pg/ml, 2.3 +/- 2.6 ng/ml and 20.8 +/- 12.3 ng/ml, respectively. 1.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D concentrations were low or undetectable in patients on dialysis or with mild renal failure. High 1.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D levels were found in 2 out of 17 patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. In 4 normal subjects treated for two weeks with large doses of 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, serum 25-hydroxy-vitamin D rose from 12.5 ng/ml to 119 ng/ml and from 0.89 ng/ml to 15 ng/ml, respectively; no changes in the 1.25-dihydroxy-vitamin D assay were found.