RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bone health is affected by chronic childhood disorders including type-1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). We conducted this randomized controlled trial with the objective of investigating the effect of 1-year supplementation of vitamin-D with milk or with pharmacological calcium on bone mass accrual in underprivileged Indian children and youth with T1DM. METHODS: 5 to 23year old (nâ¯=â¯203) underprivileged children and youth with T1DM were allocated to one of three groups: Milk (group A-received 200 ml milk + 1000 international unit (IU) vitamin-D3/day), Calcium supplement (group B-received 500 mg of calcium carbonate + 1000 IU of vitamin-D3/day) or standard of care/control (group C). Anthropometry, clinical details, biochemistry, diet (3-day 24-h recall), physical activity (questionnaires adapted for Indian children) and bone health parameters (using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and peripheral quantitative computed tomography- DXA and pQCT respectively) were evaluated at enrolment and end of 12 month intervention. RESULTS: Total body less head(TBLH) bone mineral content (BMC(g)) and bone mineral density (BMD(gm/cm2)) were significantly higher at end of study in girls in both supplemented groups (TBLHBMC-A-1011.8⯱â¯307.8, B-983.2⯱â¯352.9, C-792.8⯱â¯346.8. TBLHBMD-A-± 0.2, B-0.8⯱â¯0.2, C-0.6⯱â¯0.2, pâ¯<â¯0.05). Z score of lumbar spine bone mineral apparent density of supplemented participants of both sexes was significantly higher than controls (Boys- A-0.7⯱â¯1.1, B-0.6⯱â¯1.4, C- -0.7⯱â¯1.1; Girls- A-1.1⯱â¯1.1, B-0.9⯱â¯3.4, C- -1.7⯱â¯1.3, pâ¯<â¯0.05). A significantly higher percentage increase was found in cortical thickness in girls in both supplemented groups (A-17.9⯱â¯28.6, B-15.3⯱â¯16.5, C-7.6⯱â¯26.2); the differences remained after adjusting for confounders. CONCLUSION: Supplementation with milk or pharmacological calcium (+vitaminD3) improved bone outcomes-particularly geometry in children with T1DM with more pronounced effect in girls. Pharmacological calcium may be more cost effective in optimising bone health in T1DM in resource limited settings.
Asunto(s)
Absorciometría de Fotón , Densidad Ósea , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 , Suplementos Dietéticos , Humanos , Niño , Femenino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Densidad Ósea/efectos de los fármacos , Adolescente , India , Adulto Joven , Preescolar , Leche , Vitamina D/uso terapéutico , Vitamina D/administración & dosificación , Carbonato de Calcio/administración & dosificación , Carbonato de Calcio/uso terapéutico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Animales , Colecalciferol/administración & dosificación , Colecalciferol/uso terapéutico , Calcio de la Dieta/administración & dosificación , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Parenting a child with special health care needs (SHCN) is often stressful. This study aimed to measure and compare stress among mothers of children with (a) Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) - ASD group, (b) Developmental delay without ASD group, (c) SHCN without developmental delay group, and (d) Typically developing group. To assess factors associated with maternal stress in children with developmental disorders. METHODS: A cross-sectional analytical study was performed with children aged 2-12 years and their mothers. The study population was classified into four groups as defined above help of detailed history, developmental & behavioral assessments, psychological assessments, and Child Special Health Care Needs Screener (CSHCN). Parental Stress Scale (PSS) Questionnaire was administered. The main outcome measurement was the PSS and various factors affecting it. RESULTS: The mothers of the ASD group reported a high stress score (50.4±11.4) compared to SHCN without developmental delay group (38.2±8.8) and the Typically developing group (22.3±3.3) (pâ<â0.05) and higher but not significant stress than Developmental delay without ASD group (45.3±9.6, pâ>â0.05). Maladaptive behavioral issues and irregular interventions were the factors contributing to higher parental stress in the ASD group (pâ<â0.05). A moderate positive correlation was observed in rewarding and challenging scores of PSS among mothers of the ASD group, Developmental delay without ASD group, and SHCN without developmental delay group. CONCLUSION: Mothers of the ASD group perceived higher stress as compared to SHCN without developmental delay group and Typically developing group. Evaluation of stress and stressors is crucial for holistic management of ASD.