Sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and fecal incontinence in children: Long-term outcomes, patient benefit, and parent satisfaction.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) in children with constipation and describe patient benefit and parent satisfaction. METHODS: Using a prospective patient registry, we identified patients <21 years old with constipation treated with SNS for >2 years. We compared symptoms, medical treatment, PedsQL Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale (GSS), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL), and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI) before SNS and at follow-up. We contacted parents to administer the Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory (GCBI) and a parent satisfaction questionnaire. KEY RESULTS: We included 25 children (52% male, median age 10 years): 16 had functional constipation, six anorectal malformation, two tethered spinal cord, and one Hirschsprung's disease. Defecation frequency did not change after SNS but patients reporting fecal incontinence decreased from 72% to 20% (P<.01) and urinary incontinence decreased from 56% to 28% (P=.04). Patients using laxatives decreased from 64% to 44% (ns) and patients using antegrade enemas decreased from 48% to 20% (P=.03). GSS, most FIQL domains, and FISI were improved at follow-up. Six (24%) patients had complications requiring further surgery. Of the 16 parents contacted, 15 (94%) parents indicated positive health-related benefit and all would recommend SNS to other families. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Sacral nerve stimulation is a promising and durable treatment for children with refractory constipation, and appears particularly effective in decreasing fecal incontinence. Although a quarter of patients experienced complications requiring additional surgery, nearly all parents reported health-related benefit. Future studies to identify predictors of treatment response and complications are needed.

Antibiotic strategies and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients with pneumonia caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to investigate antibiotic prescribing patterns and effectiveness of different anti-carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) strategies for CRAB pneumonia. METHODS: We conducted a multicentre, retrospective study in three hospitals. During 2010-2015, adult ICU patients with CRAB pneumonia treated with at least one antimicrobial agent covering the CRAB isolate in vitro for more than 2 days were included. We used multivariate logistic regression to analyse the associations of anti-CRAB strategies with ICU mortality and other clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Among 238 patients with CRAB pneumonia, tigecycline monotherapy (84, 35.3%) was the most common antibiotic strategy, followed by tigecycline with colistin (43, 18.1%), colistin monotherapy (34, 14.3%), colistin combination without tigecycline (33, 13.9%), tigecycline combination without colistin (32, 13.4%), and sulbactam-based therapy without tigecycline and colistin (12, 5.0%). In multivariate analysis, tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher ICU mortality than non-tigecycline therapy (adjusted OR 2.30, 95% CI 1.19-4.46). There was no difference between colistin-based therapy and non-colistin therapy. Compared with tigecycline monotherapy, colistin monotherapy was associated with lower ICU mortality (aOR 0.30, 95% CI 0.10-0.88). Treatment failure analyses showed similar trends. Tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher treatment failure rate than non-tigecycline therapy (aOR 2.51, 95% CI 1.39-4.54), whereas colistin-based therapy was associated with lower treatment failure rate than non-colistin-based therapy (aOR 0.48, 95% CI 0.27-0.86). CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline was commonly prescribed for CRAB pneumonia. However, tigecycline-based therapy was associated with higher ICU mortality and treatment failure. Our study suggests that colistin monotherapy may be a better antibiotic strategy for CRAB pneumonia.

Improvement of quality of life and symptoms after gastric electrical stimulation in children with functional dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND: Our objective is to evaluate the effect of gastric electrical stimulation (GES) on symptoms and quality of life for pediatric patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). METHODS: Twenty-four patients (16 female, median 15 years) were treated with GES for FD after a median of 24 months of symptoms (3 months-14 years). At baseline, 46% required tube feeds and 25% parenteral nutrition. Sixty percent had gastroparesis. The PedsQL GI Module (PedsQL) was completed for 18/24 both pre-/post-GES after a median of 8 months. Patients also completed the Symptom Monitor Worksheet (SMW) pre-/post-GES after a median of 6 months. Pre-/post-GES global health was also assessed. KEY RESULTS: Significant improvements were seen in multiple areas of the PedsQL, including stomach pain/upset, food/drink limits, heartburn/reflux, gas/bloating, patient worry, medication tolerance, and constipation (P < 0.05). A decrease was found in combined symptom severity/frequency based on SMW (P < 0.01). Improvements were made in all categories, including vomiting, nausea, early satiety, bloating, fullness, epigastric pain, and burning (P < 0.01). Improvements in PedsQL/SMW scores remained when analysis was limited to normal or delayed gastric emptying (P < 0.05, P < 0.05). Thirteen percent needed tube feeds and 13% parenteral nutrition after GES. Sixty-five percent reported that their health was much improved after GES vs 15% the same or worse. Five patients experienced complications, primarily mild abdominal discomfort. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: In the largest series to date of pediatric patients who have undergone GES for FD, we found significant improvements in upper gastrointestinal symptoms, quality of life, and perception of global health. Patients were less dependent on tube feeding or parenteral nutrition.