Validation of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound in predicting outcomes of antiangiogenic therapy for solid tumors: the French multicenter support for innovative and expensive techniques study.

OBJECTIVES: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) has been used in single-center studies to evaluate tumor response to antiangiogenic treatments: the change of area under the perfusion curve (AUC), a criterion linked to blood volume, was consistently correlated with the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors response. The main objective here was to do a multicentric validation of the use of DCE-US to evaluate tumor response in different solid tumor types treated by several antiangiogenic agents. A secondary objective was to evaluate the costs of the procedure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients from 2007 to 2010 in 19 centers (8 teaching hospitals and 11 comprehensive cancer centers). All patients treated with antiangiogenic therapy were eligible. Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound examinations were performed at baseline as well as on days 7, 15, 30, and 60. For each examination, a perfusion curve was recorded during 3 minutes after injection of a contrast agent. Change from baseline at each time point was estimated for each of 7 fitted criteria. The main end point was freedom from progression (FFP). Criterion/time-point combinations with the strongest correlation with FFP were analyzed further to estimate an optimal cutoff point. RESULTS: A total of 1968 DCE-US examinations in 539 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up was 1.65 years. Variations from baseline were significant at day 30 for several criteria, with AUC having the most significant association with FFP (P = 0.00002). Patients with a greater than 40% decrease in AUC at day 30 had better FFP (P = 0.005) and overall survival (P = 0.05). The mean cost of each DCE-US was 180&OV0556;, which corresponds to $250 using the current exchange rate. CONCLUSIONS: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound is a new functional imaging technique that provides a validated criterion, namely, the change of AUC from baseline to day 30, which is predictive of tumor progression in a large multicenter cohort. Because of its low cost, it should be considered in the routine evaluation of solid tumors treated with antiangiogenic therapy.

Blood volume- and blood temperature-controlled hemodialysis in critically ill patients: a 6-month, case-matched, open-label study.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Online monitoring devices for intermittent hemodialysis have been developed to improve intradialytic cardiovascular stability in chronic dialysis patients. We propose to test blood volume and blood temperature biofeedback control systems in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI). METHODS: Twenty patients were prospectively dialyzed with machines equipped with online monitoring new devices and compared with 42 historical controls. In addition to feasibility and safety appraisals, efficacy was assessed by the intradialytic hypotension rate. RESULTS: During the study period, controlled temperature was assessed by a mean Delta(max) body temperature of -0.3 +/- 0.2 degrees C, and all but 7% of dialysis sessions achieved relative blood volume-guided ultrafiltration profiling without increased dialysis-related complications. This was associated with decreased intradialytic hypotension rate. CONCLUSION: The combination of active controlled body temperature and profiled ultrafiltration by online monitoring systems is feasible and safe in critically ill AKI patients, and suggests possibilities for improvement in intradialytic hemodynamic stability.