Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Mens Health ; 15(6): 15579883211067086, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34939514

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of 10 different surgical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with volume >60 mL. A systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) within a Bayesian framework was performed. A total of 52 parallel-group RCTs included, reporting on 6,947 participants, comparing open prostatectomy (OP), monopolar/bipolar transurethral resection of prostate (monopolar/ bipolar TURP), thulium, holmium and diode laser enucleation of prostate (LEP), bipolar enucleation of prostate, potassium titanyl phosphate laser vaporization of prostate (KTP LVP), bipolar vaporization of prostate (bipolar VP), and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy (laparoscope SP). Compared with OP, laparoscope SP identified better maximal flow rate (Qmax; mean differences [MDs] = 2.89 mL/s) at the 24th month, but bipolar VP demonstrated worse Qmax (MD = -3.20 mL/s) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS; MD = 2.60) at the 12th month. Holmium LEP (MD = 1.37) demonstrated better International Index of Erectile Function-5 at the 12th month compared with OP. However, compared with OP, KTP LVP demonstrated worse postvoid residual volume (PVR) at the sixth (MD = 10.42 mL) and 12th month (MD = 5.89 mL) and monopolar TURP (MD = 6.9 mL) demonstrated worse PVR at the 12th month. Eight new surgical methods for BPH with volume >60 mL appeared to be superior in safety compared with OP and monopolar TURP due to fewer complications. Bipolar VP and KTP LVP maybe not suitable for prostates more than 60 mL due to short- and middle-term worse Qmax, IPSS, and PVR than OP.


Asunto(s)
Hiperplasia Prostática , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Metaanálisis en Red , Hiperplasia Prostática/cirugía , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Mil Med Res ; 7(1): 41, 2020 09 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32887670

RESUMEN

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting more than seventeen million people around the world. Diagnosis and treatment guidelines for clinicians caring for patients are needed. In the early stage, we have issued "A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version)"; now there are many direct evidences emerged and may change some of previous recommendations and it is ripe for develop an evidence-based guideline. We formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members proposed 29 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 covering the following areas: chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of COVID-19, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 34 statements. Among them, 6 were strong recommendations for, 14 were weak recommendations for, 3 were weak recommendations against and 11 were ungraded consensus-based statement. They covered topics of chemoprophylaxis (including agents and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) agents), diagnosis (including clinical manifestations, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respiratory tract specimens, IgM and IgG antibody tests, chest computed tomography, chest x-ray, and CT features of asymptomatic infections), treatments (including lopinavir-ritonavir, umifenovir, favipiravir, interferon, remdesivir, combination of antiviral drugs, hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, interleukin-6 inhibitors, interleukin-1 inhibitors, glucocorticoid, qingfei paidu decoction, lianhua qingwen granules/capsules, convalescent plasma, lung transplantation, invasive or noninvasive ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)), and discharge management (including discharge criteria and management plan in patients whose RT-PCR retesting shows SARS-CoV-2 positive after discharge). We also created two figures of these recommendations for the implementation purpose. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for COVID-19 patients.


Asunto(s)
Quimioprevención/métodos , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico/métodos , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/prevención & control , Alta del Paciente/normas , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Mil. med. res. (Lond.) ; 7(41): 1-33, Sept. 04, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | BIGG | ID: biblio-1129883

RESUMEN

The novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the cause of a rapidly spreading illness, coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), affecting more than seventeen million people around the world. Diagnosis and treatment guidelines for clinicians caring for patients are needed. In the early stage, we have issued "A rapid advice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version)"; now there are many direct evidences emerged and may change some of previous recommendations and it is ripe for develop an evidence-based guideline. We formed a working group of clinical experts and methodologists. The steering group members proposed 29 questions that are relevant to the management of COVID-19 covering the following areas: chemoprophylaxis, diagnosis, treatments, and discharge management. We searched the literature for direct evidence on the management of COVID-19, and assessed its certainty generated recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Recommendations were either strong or weak, or in the form of ungraded consensus-based statement. Finally, we issued 34 statements. Among them, 6 were strong recommendations for, 14 were weak recommendations for, 3 were weak recommendations against and 11 were ungraded consensus-based statement. They covered topics of chemoprophylaxis (including agents and Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) agents), diagnosis (including clinical manifestations, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respiratory tract specimens, IgM and IgG antibody tests, chest computed tomography, chest x-ray, and CT features of asymptomatic infections), treatments (including lopinavir-ritonavir, umifenovir, favipiravir, interferon, remdesivir, combination of antiviral drugs, hydroxychloroquine/chloroquine, interleukin-6 inhibitors, interleukin-1 inhibitors, glucocorticoid, qingfei paidu decoction, lianhua qingwen granules/capsules, convalescent plasma, lung transplantation, invasive or noninvasive ventilation, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)), and discharge management (including discharge criteria and management plan in patients whose RT-PCR retesting shows SARS-CoV-2 positive after discharge). We also created two figures of these recommendations for the implementation purpose. We hope these recommendations can help support healthcare workers caring for COVID19 patients


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Adulto , Plasma/inmunología , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Cloroquina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioprevención/métodos , Receptores de Interleucina-6/uso terapéutico , Antirretrovirales/uso terapéutico , Pandemias/prevención & control , Lopinavir/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/efectos de los fármacos , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Práctica Clínica Basada en la Evidencia/métodos
4.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 88: 106914, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32829087

RESUMEN

Certain natural products, derived from medicinal plants, exhibit anti-inflammatory properties, but the mechanism of action of many remains unclear. Borrelia burgdorferi spirochetes are responsible for causing Lyme arthritis through activation of the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling pathway. In this study, we investigated the mechanisms by which Isoforskolin (ISOF) and Cucurbitacin IIa (CuIIa), compounds derived from Chinese herbs, can exert anti-inflammatory effects by modulating single immunoglobulin interleukin-1 receptor-related receptor (SIGIRR; also known as Toll/interleukin-1 receptor 8, TIR8) and thereby inhibiting B. burgdorferi basic membrane protein A (BmpA)-induced TLR signaling in human macrophages, specifically the THP-1 human monocytic cell line. After THP-1 cells were exposed in vitro to: i) recombinant (r)BmpA, ii) rBmpA and ISOF or iii) rBmpA and CuIIa, Cytotoxicity assay (Cell Counting Kit-8, CCK-8) are used to measure the effects of ISOF and CuIIa on cell viability. Meanwhile, real-time polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting were used to quantify SIGIRR mRNA and protein levels, respectively, at 6, 12, 24 and 48 h time points post-stimulation. In addition, proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) was determined by ELISA analysis. Our study showed that rBmpA stimulation of THP-1 cells resulted in a drop in SIGIRR levels in THP-1 cells. More importantly, SIGIRR levels increased significantly in rBmpA-stimulated THP-1 cells following ISOF or CuIIa administration, and the results of ELISA analysis suggested that ISOF or CuIIa reduced the secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine TNF-α. In conclusion, These results reveal new possibilities for the treatment of Lyme arthritis.


Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios/farmacología , Proteínas Bacterianas/farmacología , Borrelia burgdorferi , Colforsina/análogos & derivados , Colforsina/farmacología , Cucurbitacinas/farmacología , Macrófagos/efectos de los fármacos , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Receptores de Interleucina-1/genética , Receptores de Interleucina-1/metabolismo , Células THP-1 , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/metabolismo
5.
Mil Med Res ; 7(1): 4, 2020 02 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32029004

RESUMEN

In December 2019, a new type viral pneumonia cases occurred in Wuhan, Hubei Province; and then named "2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)" by the World Health Organization (WHO) on 12 January 2020. For it is a never been experienced respiratory disease before and with infection ability widely and quickly, it attracted the world's attention but without treatment and control manual. For the request from frontline clinicians and public health professionals of 2019-nCoV infected pneumonia management, an evidence-based guideline urgently needs to be developed. Therefore, we drafted this guideline according to the rapid advice guidelines methodology and general rules of WHO guideline development; we also added the first-hand management data of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University. This guideline includes the guideline methodology, epidemiological characteristics, disease screening and population prevention, diagnosis, treatment and control (including traditional Chinese Medicine), nosocomial infection prevention and control, and disease nursing of the 2019-nCoV. Moreover, we also provide a whole process of a successful treatment case of the severe 2019-nCoV infected pneumonia and experience and lessons of hospital rescue for 2019-nCoV infections. This rapid advice guideline is suitable for the first frontline doctors and nurses, managers of hospitals and healthcare sections, community residents, public health persons, relevant researchers, and all person who are interested in the 2019-nCoV.


Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Infección Hospitalaria , Control de Infecciones , Tamizaje Masivo , Equipo de Protección Personal , Neumonía Viral , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidad , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/terapia , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Medicamentos Herbarios Chinos , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Fluidoterapia , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/normas , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , Epidemiología Molecular , Atención de Enfermería , Neumonía Viral/diagnóstico , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/etiología , Neumonía Viral/terapia , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA