Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nutrients ; 12(3)2020 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32183492

RESUMEN

Over the past decades, survival rates for patients with resectable esophageal cancer have improved significantly. Consequently, the sequelae of having a gastric conduit, such as development of micronutrient deficiencies, become increasingly apparent. This study investigated postoperative micronutrient trends in the follow-up of patients following a minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) for cancer. Patients were included if they had at least one postoperative evaluation of iron, ferritin, vitamins B1, B6, B12, D, folate or methylmalonic acid. Data were available in 83 of 95 patients. Of these, 78.3% (65/83) had at least one and 37.3% (31/83) had more than one micronutrient deficiency at a median of 6.1 months (interquartile range (IQR) 5.4-7.5) of follow-up. Similar to the results found in previous studies, most common deficiencies identified were: iron, vitamin B12 and vitamin D. In addition, folate deficiency and anemia were detected in a substantial amount of patients in this cohort. At 24.8 months (IQR 19.4-33.1) of follow-up, micronutrient deficiencies were still common, however, most deficiencies normalized following supplementation on indication. In conclusion, patients undergoing a MIE are at risk of developing micronutrient deficiencies as early as 6 up to 24 months after surgery and should therefore be routinely checked and supplemented when needed.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Desnutrición/etiología , Micronutrientes/deficiencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Suplementos Dietéticos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrición/mortalidad , Desnutrición/prevención & control , Micronutrientes/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado Nutricional , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Periodo Posoperatorio , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de Tiempo
2.
BMJ Open ; 6(8): e011979, 2016 08 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27496239

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Early start of an oral diet is safe and beneficial in most types of gastrointestinal surgery and is a crucial part of fast track or enhanced recovery protocols. However, the feasibility and safety of oral intake directly following oesophagectomy remain unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate the effects of early versus delayed start of oral intake on postoperative recovery following oesophagectomy. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is an open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial. Patients undergoing elective minimally invasive or hybrid oesophagectomy for cancer are eligible. Further inclusion criteria are intrathoracic anastomosis, written informed consent and age 18 years or older. Inability for oral intake, inability to place a feeding jejunostomy, inability to provide written consent, swallowing disorder, achalasia, Karnofsky Performance Status <80 and malnutrition are exclusion criteria. Patients will be randomised using online randomisation software. The intervention group (direct oral feeding) will receive a liquid oral diet for 2 weeks with gradually expanding daily maximums. The control group (delayed oral feeding) will receive enteral feeding via a jejunostomy during 5 days and then start the same liquid oral diet. The primary outcome measure is functional recovery. Secondary outcome measures are 30-day surgical complications; nutritional status; need for artificial nutrition; need for additional interventions; health-related quality of life. We aim to recruit 148 patients. Statistical analysis will be performed according to an intention to treat principle. Results are presented as risk ratios with corresponding 95% CIs. A two-tailed p<0.05 is considered statistically significant. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Our study protocol has received ethical approval from the Medical research Ethics Committees United (MEC-U). This study is conducted according to the principles of Good Clinical Practice. Verbal and written informed consent is required before randomisation. All data will be collected using an online database with adequate security measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT02378948 and Dutch trial registry: NTR4972; Pre-results.


Asunto(s)
Ingestión de Alimentos , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Suplementos Dietéticos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos , Estado Nutricional , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Recuperación de la Función , Proyectos de Investigación , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA