Bleached enamel reversal using grape seed extract, green tea, curcumin-activated photodynamic therapy, and Er: YAG on microleakage and bond integrity of composite material bonded to the enamel surface.

AIMS: Bleached enamel reversal using antioxidants sodium ascorbate (SA), Green tea extract (GTE), grape seed extract (GSE), Curcumin photosensitizer (CP) and Er: YAG laser on the adhesive strength and marginal leakage of composite material bonded to the bleached enamel surface. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Enamel surface of hundred and twenty sound human first premolar teeth was cleansed using pumice and bleached with 35 % hydrogen peroxide. The samples were randomly divided into 5 groups based on the antioxidants used. n = 20 Group 1 (Control): No antioxidant agent, Group 2: 10 % SA solution, Group 3: 6.5 % GSE, Group 4: 5 % GTE, Group 5: Er: YAG laser and Group 6: CP. Following reversal, the composite was built and cured for 40 s. All the specimens were stored in distilled water at room temperature for 1 day. Microleakage, SBS, and failure mode were analyzed. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, one-way analysis of variance, and Tukey's multiple post hoc test were used to analyze the data statistically. RESULTS: Group 2 (SA) (20.11 ± 5.79 nm) exhibited minimum value of microleakage and highest SBS (10.22 ± 1.62 MPa). Whereas, Group 1 (No antioxidant agent) displayed maximum scores of marginal leakage (28.11±8.89 nm) and lowest SBS (7.02 ± 1.22 MPa). CONCLUSION: CP, GTE and GSE can be used as a potential alternative to the commonly used SA solution to reverse the negative impact of bleaching on the enamel surface. The use of reversal agents CP, GTE and GSE improves bond values with a decrease in microleakage scores However, future studies are still warranted to conclude the outcomes of the existing study.

Poly-Ether Ether-Ketone Post Conditioned with Sulfuric Acid, Rose Bengal Activated by Photodynamic Therapy and Sandblasting on Pushout Bond Strength to Radicular Dentin Luted with Methyl Methacrylate and Composite-Based Cement.

Objective: Assessment of post surface conditioners [sulfuric acid (SA), Rose Bengal (RB), and sandblasting (SB)] and different luting cements [methyl methacrylate (MMA)-based cement and composite-based cement] on pushout bond strength (PBS) of poly-ether ether-ketone (PEEK) post bonded to canal dentin. Materials and methods: Endodontic treatment was performed on 120 single-rooted human premolar teeth. The preparation of the post space was performed and 4 mm of gutta-percha was retained in the apical region of the root. One hundred and twenty PEEK posts were fabricated from a PEEK blank utilizing a Computer aided design-Computer aided manufacture (CAD-CAM) system. The PEEK posts were allocated randomly into four groups based on post surface conditioning (n = 30). Group A: SA, Group B: RB, Group C: SB, and Group D: No conditioning (NC). Each group was further divided into two subgroups based on the luting cement used for bonding (n = 15). Group A1, B1, C1, and D1 specimens were cemented using composite-based resin cement. However, Group A2, B2, C2, and D2 posts were luted with MMA-based resin cement. PBS assessment using a universal testing machine was performed. Failure modes were analyzed under a stereomicroscope. The data relating to the effects of surface treatment and luting types of cement were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post hoc test (p = 0.05). Results: Coronal section of Group B2: RB+Super-Bond C&B [9.61 ± 0.75 megapascals (MPa)] displayed the highest bond scores of PEEK after root dentin. Whereas it was also discovered that Group D1: NC+Panavia®V5 (2.05 ± 0.72 MPa) presented the lowest PBS scores. Intergroup comparison analysis revealed that Group A2: SA+Super-Bond C&B and Group B2: RB+Super-Bond C&B displayed no significant difference in their bond scores. Conclusions: RB and SA possess the potential to be used as a PEEK post conditioner. MMA-based cement displayed better performance than composite-based cement.

Repair strength and surface topography of lithium disilicate and hybrid resin ceramics with LLLT and photodynamic therapy in comparison to hydrofluoric acid.

AIM: The aim was to compare the repair bond strength and surface topography of lithium disilicate ceramics (LDC) and hybrid resin ceramics (HRC) using different surface conditioning treatments [low level laser therapy (LLLT), photodynamic therapy (PDT), hydrofluoric acid (HF) with silane and air abrasion (AA) and silane]. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Sixty specimens each of LDC and HRC were used. Discs were prepared for each group (6 × 2 mm), conditioned using different regimes. Specimens in group 1 and 5 were laser irradiated using Er,Cr:YSGG (ECYL), group 2 and 6 were conditioned using methylene blue photosensitizer (PDT), group 3 and 7 surface was treated with hydrofluoric acid and silane (HFA-S), group 4 and 8 conditioned with Al2O3 air abrasion and silane (AA-S). A Porcelain Repair Kit was used according to manufacturer recommendation in all samples. Peak universal bond adhesive was rubbed on ceramic surface and then bonded with composite resin. For shear bond strength testing the specimens were placed in a universal testing machine. A stereomicroscope at 40x magnification was used to analyse failure pattern. Five specimens in each group after surface treatment were evaluated for surface changes and topography using scanning electron microscopy. The mean repair bond strength was calculated using ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc test at a significance level of (p < 0.05). RESULT: The highest repair bond strength was observed in group 3 (LDC) (20.57 ± 3.58 MPa) (HFA-S), whereas, the lowest score was displayed in Group 2 (LDC) using methylene blue photosensitizer (MBPS) (12.18 ± 1.08 MPa). Similarly, in HRC the highest repair SBS was presented in group 8 (AA-S) (20.52 ± 2.51 MPa) and the lowest SBS values were exhibited by PDT treated group 6 (13.22 ± 0.62 MPa). CONCLUSION: A combination of mechanical and chemical surface treatments should be used in order to achieve adequate repair bond strength between resin composites and ceramic interface of LDC and HRC.

Antimicrobial efficacy of silver diamine fluoride in comparison to photodynamic therapy and chlorhexidine on canal disinfection and bond strength to radicular dentin.

AIM: To assess the antimicrobial efficacy of Silver diamine fluoride (SDF), Sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), Chlorhexidine (CHX) and Photodynamic therapy (PDT) in radicular dentin and subsequent bond strength of Fiber reinforced composite post (FRCP) to radicular dentin. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty extracted premolars were disinfected and decoronated up-to cement-o-enamel junction (CEJ). Canals were instrumented using crown-down technique, dried and filled with gutta percha. Post space was prepared with the help of peso reamers and inoculated with E. faecalis. Samples were randomly allocated into four groups based on chemical irrigation (n = 10). Group 1, canal disinfected with (PDT, MB), group 2 (5.25 % NaOCl +17 % EDTA), group 3 (3.8 % SDF) and group 4 (CHX). Specimens were tested with confocal laser scanning microscopy analysis (CLSM) to confirm the presence of E. faecalis. Fibre post were luted in root canal and sectioned at three levels (apical, middle and coronal). Push-out test was performed and failure analysis of debonded surfaces was evaluated using stereomicroscope. Live and dead cells after exposure were calculated in percentage. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) assessed the means and standard deviations of extrusion bond strength (EBS). Tukey multiple comparison tests was used to compare means of bond strength (p = 0.05). RESULTS: The maximum antimicrobial efficacy against E. faecalis was observed in group 2 which included canal disinfected with 5.25 % NaOCl and 17 % EDTA (64.41 ±â€¯1.22). Similarly, CHX showed lowest effectiveness as canal irrigant against E.faecalis (58.29 ±â€¯2.41). Intragroup comparison revealed highest bond strength for group 2 at all three level. Similarly, the lowest EBS was found in CHX group. Inter-group comparison confirmed comparable EBS at all root levels (apical, middle and coronal) for group 2 and group 3 (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Radicular dentin treated with 5.25 % NaOCl and 17 % EDTA displayed highest antimicrobial and bond strength scores. SDF and PDT can potentially be used in canal irrigation.