Use of Temporary Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation in an Oncologic Population: A Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with an underlying cancer diagnosis may experience pain from many sources. Temporary, percutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) is a minimally invasive procedure that can control pain in those who have failed conservative management. The purpose of this retrospective review is to show the use of PNS in managing pain in the oncologic setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Temporary, percutaneous PNS was placed under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance for 15 patients at a cancer pain facility. Cases were grouped by subtypes of cancer pain (ie, tumor-related, treatment-related, cancer-associated conditions, and cancer-independent). Before PNS, patients were refractory to medical management or previous interventional treatments. Patients were observed with routine clinic visits to monitor pain levels via visual analog scale (VAS) and quality-of-life measures. PNS was removed after the indicated 60-day treatment period. RESULTS: This retrospective review presents ten successful cases of oncologic-related pain treated with PNS. Patients with subtypes of pain that were tumor related, from cancer-associated conditions, and cancer independent all experienced a similar degree of pain relief. However, patients with cancer-treatment-related pain experienced the least analgesia from PNS. We also present six cases in which PNS did not provide adequate pain relief. CONCLUSION: PNS is an emerging technology in neuromodulation that may be useful in managing pain, especially in the oncologic population. Patients with cancer-related and non-cancer-related pain localized to a specific nerve distribution should be considered appropriate candidates for PNS. Further research is needed to optimize patient selection and indications for PNS in the population with cancer.

HEALTH CONDITIONS LINKED TO AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION ASSOCIATED WITH DARK ADAPTATION.

PURPOSE: To determine the association between dark adaption (DA) and different health conditions linked with age-related macular degeneration (AMD). METHODS: Cross-sectional study, including patients with AMD and a control group. Age-related macular degeneration was graded according to the Age-Related Eye Disease Study (AREDS) classification. We obtained data on medical history, medications, and lifestyle. Dark adaption was assessed with the extended protocol (20 minutes) of AdaptDx (MacuLogix). For analyses, the right eye or the eye with more advanced AMD was selected. Multivariate linear and logistic regressions were performed, accounting for age and AMD stage. RESULTS: Seventy-eight subjects (75.6% AMD; 24.4% controls) were included. Multivariate assessments revealed that body mass index (BMI; ß = 0.30, P = 0.045), taking AREDS vitamins (ß = 5.51, P < 0.001), and family history of AMD (ß = 2.68, P = 0.039) were significantly associated with worse rod intercept times. Abnormal DA (rod intercept time ≥ 6.5 minutes) was significantly associated with family history of AMD (ß = 1.84, P = 0.006), taking AREDS supplements (ß = 1.67, P = 0.021) and alcohol intake (ß = 0.07, P = 0.017). CONCLUSION: Besides age and AMD stage, a higher body mass index, higher alcohol intake, and a family history of AMD seem to impair DA. In this cohort, the use of AREDS vitamins was also statistically linked with impaired DA, most likely because of an increased severity of disease in subjects taking them.