Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Fundam Clin Pharmacol ; 35(3): 506-523, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33107619

RESUMEN

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major dose-limiting side effect induced by a variety of chemotherapeutic agents. Symptoms are mainly sensory: pain, tingling, numbness, and temperature sensitivity. They may require the tapering of chemotherapy regimens or even their cessation; thus, the prevention/treatment of CIPN is critical to increase effectiveness of cancer treatment. However, CIPN management is mainly based on conventional neuropathic pain treatments, with poor clinical efficacy. Therefore, significant effort is made to identify new pharmacological targets to prevent/treat CIPN. Animal modeling is a key component in predicting human response to drugs and in understanding the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CIPN. In fact, studies performed in rodents highlighted several pharmacological targets to treat/prevent CIPN. This review provides updated information about ongoing clinical trials testing drugs for the management of CIPN and presents some of their proof-of-concept studies conducted in rodent models. The presented drugs target oxidative stress, renin-angiotensin system, glutamatergic neurotransmission, sphingolipid metabolism, neuronal uptake transporters, nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide metabolism, endocannabinoid system, transient receptor potential channels, and serotoninergic receptors. As some clinical trials focus on the effect of the drugs on pain, others evaluate their efficacy by assessing general neuropathy. Moreover, based on studies conducted in rodent models, it remains unclear if some of the tested drugs act in an antinociceptive fashion or have neuroprotective properties. Thus, further investigations are needed to understand their mechanism of action, as well as a global standardization of the methods used to assess efficacy of new therapeutic strategies in the treatment of CIPN.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neuralgia/inducido químicamente , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Endocannabinoides/metabolismo , Glutamatos/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , NAD/metabolismo , Neuralgia/fisiopatología , Estrés Oxidativo/efectos de los fármacos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Receptores de Serotonina/efectos de los fármacos , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efectos de los fármacos , Roedores , Esfingolípidos/metabolismo , Canales de Potencial de Receptor Transitorio/efectos de los fármacos
2.
Neurotherapeutics ; 18(1): 378-386, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32964402

RESUMEN

High-dose biotin (HDB) is a therapy used in non-active progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). Several reports have suggested that HDB treatment may be associated with an increased risk of relapse. We aimed to determine whether HDB increases the risk of clinical relapse in PMS and describe the characteristics of the patients who experience it. We conducted a French, multicenter, retrospective study, comparing a group of PMS patients treated with HDB to a matched control group. Poisson regression was applied to model the specific statistical distribution of the annualized relapse rate (ARR). A propensity score (PS), based on the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW), was used to adjust for indication bias and included the following variables: gender, primary PMS or not, age, EDSS, time since the last relapse, and co-prescription of a DMT. Two thousand six hundred twenty-eight patients treated with HDB and 654 controls were analyzed with a follow-up of 17 ± 8 months. Among them, 148 validated relapses were observed in the group treated with biotin and 38 in the control group (p = 0.62). After adjustment based on the PS, the ARR was 0.044 ± 0.23 for the biotin-treated group and 0.028 ± 0.16 for the control group (p = 0.18). The more relapses there were before biotin, the higher the risk of relapse during treatment, independently from the use of HDB. While the number of relapses reported for patients with no previous inflammatory activity receiving biotin has gradually increased, the present retrospective study is adequately powered to exclude an elevated risk of relapse for patients with PMS treated with HDB.


Asunto(s)
Biotina/uso terapéutico , Esclerosis Múltiple Crónica Progresiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Biotina/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
J Headache Pain ; 18(1): 75, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28733943

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: OnabotulinumtoxinA has proven its efficacy in reducing the number of headache days in chronic migraine (CM) patients. The usual paradigm includes 31 pericranial injection sites with low dose (5 U) per site. The aim of this study is to present the results obtained using a simpler injection protocol of onabotulinumtoxinA, with injection sites targeted to pericranial myofascial sites of pain. METHODS: Observational, open label, real-life, cohort study. We enrolled 63 consecutive patients fulfilling the diagnostic criteria of CM, and refractory to conventional treatments. The patients were injected using a "follow-the-pain" pattern into the corrugator and/or temporalis and/or trapezius muscles. The doses per muscle were fixed. According to the number of muscles injected, the total dose could vary from 70 to 150 U per session. Patients were considered responders if they had a ≥ 50% decrease in number of headache days in at least two consecutive injection cycles. RESULTS: Forty one patients (65.1% in intention to treat analysis) responded to treatment. In 70.7% of responders, the effect size was even higher, with a reduction ≥70% in the number of headache days. The associated cervical pain and muscle tenderness, present in 33 patients, was reduced by ≥50% in 31 patients (94%). Triptan consumption dramatically decreased (81%) in responders. The trapezius was the most frequently injected muscle. We observed no serious adverse event. The mean patient satisfaction rate was 8.5/10. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides additional robust evidence supporting the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA injections in CM. Furthermore, the paradigm we used, with reduced number of injection sites targeted to pericranial myofascial sites of pain, may provide evidence in favor of the implication of myofascial trigger points in migraine chronicization. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Record I17022 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03175263 . Date of registration: June 7, 2017. Retrospectively registered.


Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas Tipo A/administración & dosificación , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos Migrañosos/epidemiología , Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial/tratamiento farmacológico , Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial/epidemiología , Inhibidores de la Liberación de Acetilcolina/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Enfermedad Crónica , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos Migrañosos/diagnóstico , Síndromes del Dolor Miofascial/diagnóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA