The Safety and Efficacy of Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement Combined with Electrophysiology Procedures.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) and electrophysiology (EP) procedures. A retrospective review was undertaken to identify TPVR and EP procedures that were concomitantly performed in the cardiac catheterization laboratory at University of Iowa Stead Family Children's Hospital from January 2011 to October 2019. Procedural and follow-up data were compared between patients who underwent TPVR and EP procedures in the same setting to those who received TPVR or EP procedure separately and that were similar in age and cardiac anatomy. A total of 8 patients underwent combined TPVR and EP procedures. One patient was excluded due to lack of adequate control, leaving seven study subjects (57% female; median age at time of procedure 16 years). The median follow-up time was 11.5 months (range 2-36 months). Patients who received combined TPVR and EP had shorter recovery times (combined: median 18.9 h; IQR 18.35-19.5 vs separate: median 27.98 h; IQR 21.42-39.25; p-value 0.031), shorter hospital length of stay (combined: median 27.5 h; IQR 26.47-31.4 vs separate: median 38.4 h; IQR 33.42-51.50; p-value 0.016), and a 51% reduction in total hospital charges (combined: median $171,640; IQR 135.43-219.22 vs separate: median $333,560 IQR 263.20-400.98; p-value 0.016). There were no significant differences in radiation dose or procedure time between the combined and control groups. The median radiation time for those who had the combination procedure was 30.5 min [IQR 29.6-47.9], and the median dose area product was 215 mGy [IQR 158-935]. In conclusion, combining TPVR and EP procedures is feasible, safe, and economically advantageous.

Cost analysis of combining congenital cardiac catheterization and electrophysiology procedures in an outpatient setting.

BACKGROUND: Patients with congenital heart disease require multiple procedures over their lifetime. These procedures increase cost and time commitment. Previous studies in the field of medicine have shown that combining procedures is an effective method to reduce cost and time. There has been no such study to evaluate the cost and efficiency of combining pediatric cardiac procedures. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the cost and time commitment of combined cardiac catheterization (cath) and electrophysiology (EP) outpatient procedures against separate cath and EP procedure. METHODS: Outpatient combination procedures performed in the pediatric cardiac cath lab from 2013 to 2016 were matched to a control population of two or three similar single outpatient procedures from 2009 to 2016 for patients of similar age and cardiac anatomy. Procedure duration, recovery duration, length of stay, equipment charges, physician charges, all other hospital charges, and total admission charges were analyzed. The two groups were compared using an unpaired t-test. RESULTS: A total of 92 subjects, 32 study subjects and 60 control subjects, were included in this study. Study group procedures had a significantly shorter recovery duration (P = 0.04) and length of stay (P = 0.01). Study group procedure duration trended shorter on average but statistically insignificant (P = 0.20). The total median savings for patients undergoing combined procedures in the study group was $13,181 (interquartile range $423.8-$26710). CONCLUSIONS: Combining cath and EP outpatient procedures reduces the time commitment and provides some economic advantage.