Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 35(8): 454-460, 2022 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35293377

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To summarize clinical outcomes of paradoxical pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) onset in patients on biologic therapy. METHODS: The authors conducted MEDLINE and EMBASE searches using PRISMA guidelines to include 57 patients (23 reports). RESULTS: Of the included patients, 71.9% (n = 41/57) noted PG onset after initiating rituximab, 21.1% (n = 12/57) noted tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) inhibitors, 5.3% (n = 3/57) reported interleukin 17A inhibitors, and 1.8% (n = 1/57) reported cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 antibodies. The majority of patients (94.3%) discontinued biologic use. The most common medications used to resolve rituximab-associated PG were intravenous immunoglobulins, oral corticosteroids, and antibiotics, with an average resolution time of 3.3 months. Complete resolution of PG in TNF-α-associated cases occurred within an average of 2.2 months after switching to another TNF-α inhibitor (n = 1), an interleukin 12/23 inhibitor (n = 2), or treatment with systemic corticosteroids and cyclosporine (n = 3), systemic corticosteroids alone (n = 1), or cyclosporine alone (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Further investigations are warranted to determine whether PG onset is associated with underlying comorbidities, the use of biologic agents, or a synergistic effect. Nevertheless, PG may develop in patients on rituximab or TNF-α inhibitors, suggesting the need to monitor and treat such adverse effects.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Biológica , Piodermia Gangrenosa , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Terapia Biológica/efectos adversos , Ciclosporinas/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Piodermia Gangrenosa/inducido químicamente , Piodermia Gangrenosa/terapia , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversos
7.
J Cutan Med Surg ; 24(3): 273-277, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32003582

RESUMEN

Psoriasis is a chronic, inflammatory disease with a varying degree of clinical presentations. Managing psoriasis has always been arduous due to its chronicity and its propensity to relapse. Prior to the development of targeted biologic therapies, there were few effective treatments for psoriasis. Ancient psoriasis therapies included pinetar, plant extracts, psychotherapy, arsenic, and ammoniated mercury. In the 19th century, chrysarobin was developed. Then, in the early half of the 20th century, anthralin and coal tar were in widespread use. In the latter half of the 20th century, treatments were limited to topical first-line therapies, systemic drugs, and phototherapy. However, as the treatment of psoriasis has undergone a revolutionary change with the development of novel biologic therapies, patients with moderate to severe psoriasis have been able to avail therapies with high efficacy and durability along with an acceptable safety profile. This article is a brief historical review of the management of psoriasis prior to the inception of biologics and with the development of novel biologic therapies.


Asunto(s)
Terapia Biológica/historia , Fármacos Dermatológicos/historia , Psoriasis/historia , Psoriasis/terapia , Amoníaco/historia , Antracenos/historia , Arsénico/historia , Canadá , Alquitrán/historia , Historia del Siglo XIX , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Cloruro de Mercurio/historia , Fototerapia/historia , Extractos Vegetales/historia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA