Modified FOLFIRINOX versus CisGem first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced non resectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer (AMEBICA)-PRODIGE 38: Study protocol for a randomized controlled multicenter phase II/III study.

INTRODUCTION: Combination of cisplatine and Gemcitabine (CisGem) is the reference 1st line Chemotherapy in patients with advanced biliary cancer. FOLFIRINOX demonstrated an overall survival superiority when compared to gemcitabine in 1st line for patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Because of similarities between pancreatic and biliary cancers, we proposed a randomized trial comparing mFOLFIRINOX and CisGEm. AIM: PRODIGE38-AMEBICA is a phase II/III trial evaluating efficacy of modifed FOLFIRINOX (D1 bolus removed) or CisGEm on patients with locally advanced non resectable or metastatic biliary tract cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Main inclusion criteria are histologically or cytologically proven biliary tract tumor (intra or extra hepatic or hilar or gallbladder carcinoma), measurable disease (metastases and/or primary tumor), Bilirubin <1,5 N and transaminases <5 N. The randomization (ratio 1:1) will be stratified on center, stage of the disease, tumor localization and previous adjuvant treatment. The Phase II trial has an objective of 73% patients alive and without progression at 6 months for Folfirinox (versus 59% for Gemcis). 128 additional patients should be added in the phase III trial with an objective of overall survival improvement of 4 months in favor of mFOLFIRINOX. CONCLUSION: The study is opened in France (EudraCT no.: 2015-002282-35). All the patients (188) of the phase II part are currently randomized.

FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine as Adjuvant Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer, combination chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (FOLFIRINOX) leads to longer overall survival than gemcitabine therapy. We compared the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen with gemcitabine as adjuvant therapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned 493 patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma to receive a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen (oxaliplatin [85 mg per square meter of body-surface area], irinotecan [180 mg per square meter, reduced to 150 mg per square meter after a protocol-specified safety analysis], leucovorin [400 mg per square meter], and fluorouracil [2400 mg per square meter] every 2 weeks) or gemcitabine (1000 mg per square meter on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks) for 24 weeks. The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival and safety. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, the median disease-free survival was 21.6 months in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and 12.8 months in the gemcitabine group (stratified hazard ratio for cancer-related event, second cancer, or death, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46 to 0.73; P<0.001). The disease-free survival rate at 3 years was 39.7% in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and 21.4% in the gemcitabine group. The median overall survival was 54.4 months in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and 35.0 months in the gemcitabine group (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.86; P=0.003). The overall survival rate at 3 years was 63.4% in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and 48.6% in the gemcitabine group. Adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 75.9% of the patients in the modified-FOLFIRINOX group and in 52.9% of those in the gemcitabine group. One patient in the gemcitabine group died from toxic effects (interstitial pneumonitis). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant therapy with a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen led to significantly longer survival than gemcitabine among patients with resected pancreatic cancer, at the expense of a higher incidence of toxic effects. (Funded by R&D Unicancer and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01526135 ; EudraCT number, 2011-002026-52 .).

Postoperative hepatic arterial chemotherapy in high-risk patients as adjuvant treatment after resection of colorectal liver metastases - a randomized phase II/III trial - PACHA-01 (NCT02494973).

BACKGROUND: After curative-intent surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), liver recurrence occurs in more than 60% of patients, despite the administration of perioperative or adjuvant chemotherapy. This risk is even higher after resection of more than three CRLM. As CRLM are mostly supplied by arterial blood flow, hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of chemotherapeutic agents after resection of CRLM is an attractive approach. Oxaliplatin-based HAI chemotherapy, in association with systemic fluoropyrimidines, has been shown to be safe and highly active in patients with CRLM. In a retrospective series of 98 patients at high risk of hepatic recurrence (≥4 resected CRLM), adjuvant HAI oxaliplatin combined with systemic chemotherapy was feasible and significantly improved disease-free survival compared to adjuvant, 'modern' systemic chemotherapy alone. METHODS/DESIGN: This study is designed as a multicentre, randomized, phase II/III trial. The first step is a non-comparative randomized phase II trial (power, 95%; one-sided alpha risk, 10%). Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to adjuvant systemic FOLFOX (control arm) or adjuvant HAI oxaliplatin plus systemic LV5FU2 (experimental arm). A total 114 patients will need to be included. The main objective of this trial is to evaluate the potential survival benefit of adjuvant HAI with oxaliplatin after resection of at least 4 CRLM (primary endpoint: 18-month hepatic recurrence-free survival rate). We also aim to assess the feasibility of delivering at least 4 cycles of HAI (or i.v.) oxaliplatin after surgical treatment of at least 4 CRLM, the toxicity (NCI-CTC v4.0) of adjuvant HAI plus systemic chemotherapy, including HAI catheter-related complications, compared to systemic chemotherapy alone, and the efficacy of adjuvant HAI on hepatic and extra-hepatic recurrence-free (survival and overall survival). DISCUSSION: If 18-month hepatic recurrence-free survival is greater than 50% in the experimental arm, the study will be pursued in phase III, for which the primary endpoint will be 3-year recurrence-free survival rate. Patients randomized in the phase II will be included in the phase III, with an additional number of 106 patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02494973 . Trial registration date: July 10, 2015.

Peritoneal and extraperitoneal relapse after previous curative treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer: What survival can we expect?

INTRODUCTION: Over the last 20 years, complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) dramatically increased the survival of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRPM). However, despite better knowledge of the disease, around 70% of patients relapse after CRS with HIPEC. This study was designed to analyse the pattern of recurrence and the outcomes of different treatment modalities. METHODS: Patients relapsing after CRS plus HIPEC for CRPM were selected from a prospective database. The impact of iterative curative-intent treatments was analysed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS: Between April 1993 and December 2014, 190 of 274 (69%) patients previously treated by CRS plus HIPEC developed relapse, as an isolated peritoneal recurrence (31%), isolated distant recurrence (35%), or multisite recurrence (34%). The curative-intent treatment rate was 48% for isolated peritoneal recurrences, 49% for isolated distant recurrences and 22% for multisite recurrences (p = 0.002). From the diagnosis of relapse, 3- and 5-year overall survival were 77% and 46% after curative-intent treatment and 14% and 4.7% after non-curative treatment, with median survival of 59.7 and 18.3 months (log-rank p < 0.0001), respectively. Regression analysis identified the initial extent of CRPM (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.25; p < 0.0001), iterative curative-intent treatment (HR: 0.22; p < 0.0001) and disease-free interval (HR: 1.77; p = 0.01) as independent predictors of prolonged survival. CONCLUSIONS: Iterative curative-intent treatment can be performed in up to 40% of patients with relapse after CRS and HIPEC for CRPM, and is associated with prolonged survival in selected patients.

Conversion to Complete Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma After Bidirectional Chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: This report aims to describe preliminary results concerning secondary resectability after bidirectional chemotherapy for initially unresectable malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM). METHODS: Between January 2013 and January 2016, 20 consecutive patients treated for diffuse MPM not suitable for upfront surgery received bidirectional chemotherapy associating intraperitoneal and systemic chemotherapy. Evaluation of the response to chemotherapy was assessed clinically and by laparoscopy. RESULTS: The median peritoneal cancer index (PCI) score at staging laparoscopy was 27 (range 15-39). Altogether, 118 intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles were administered without any specific adverse catheter-related event. Concerning tolerance, 85% of the patients experienced no pain or mild pain during chemotherapy administration. The clinical response rate was 60% after a median of three chemotherapy cycles. At laparoscopic reevaluation, the median PCI was 18 (range 0-35), and a secondary resectability was considered for 55% of the patients. Complete cytoreduction surgery followed by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was finally achieved for 10 patients (50%), with a median intraoperative PCI score of 14 (range 6-30). After a median follow-up period of 18 months, the 2-year overall survival rate was 83.3% for the patients treated by CRS followed by HIPEC and 44% for the patients treated by bidirectional chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Bidirectional chemotherapy is a promising, well-tolerated treatment capable of increasing the resection rate for selected patients with diffuse MPM initially considered as unresectable or borderline resectable. For patients with definitively unresectable disease, bidirectional chemotherapy achieves a higher clinical response rate.

Intra-arterial therapies for colorectal cancer liver metastases (radioembolization excluded).

During the past 20 years, advances in systemic therapies have improved overall survival of patients with Colorectal cancer Liver metastases (CRLM) from 6 to 24 months. By reaching CRLM via their preferential arterial vascularization, hepatic arterial infusion of chemotherapy (HAIC) has demonstrated improvement in response rate and deepness of response. Improvement in deepness of response is potentially helpful to convert no surgical patient to surgery. Recent HAIC regimens, including HAIC-FUDR plus systemic oxaliplatin/irinotecan, or HAIC-oxaliplatin plus systemic 5FU and cetuximab yielded a 92% and 90% response rate respectively, and conversion to R0 surgery in 47% and 42% of patients, respectively. When HAIC delivered a drug ineffective through intravenous delivery, this rechallenge provided 62% response rate for HAIC. Nowadays, port-catheter implanted percutaneously by radiologists has 95% feasibility with primary patency equivalent to that of surgically implanted catheters, and secondary patency superior after radiologic revision. Retrospective studies demonstrated prolonged DFS of HAIC over IV chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting after surgery of CRLM. Drug eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) were developed as drug carrier and embolization platform for treatment of CRLM by chemoembolization. DEBIRI allows for a very high level of SN-38 (SN-38 is the active compound of irinotecan) and a very high rate of complete l response at pathologic studies of treated metastases. DEBIRI was compared to systemic FOLFIRI in a phase III randomized trial including 74 patients with benefit in overall survival and disease-free survival.

Feasibility of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy Without Central Venous Access Device in Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is a standard adjuvant treatment for patients with stage III colon cancer (CC). Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine, and administration of oxaliplatin does not necessarily require the insertion of a central venous access device (CVAD). We evaluated the feasibility of XELOX without a CVAD as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III CC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied prospectively collected data from patients with stage III CC treated with XELOX in the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy French trial. Patients were divided into 2 groups: those with a CVAD and those with peripheral venous access (PVA), including patients who had and had not had a CVAD at the first cycle of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy without a CVAD was considered feasible if the patient received all cycles of adjuvant therapy without it. RESULTS: A total of 203 patients were included: 86 (43%) in the PVA group and 116 (57%) in the CVAD group. Of the 85 patients in the PVA group (1 patient was not treated), 69 (81.2%) did not require the insertion of a CVAD. However, 16 (18.8%) required CVAD insertion owing to systematic delay of the initially planned CVAD before the second cycle of chemotherapy in 7, complications related to PVA usage in 5, a switch to the modified FOLFOX6 regimen in 2, and other reasons in 2. The oxaliplatin dose was similar in both groups regardless of the chemotherapy duration. XELOX without a CVAD was feasible for 81.2% of the patients for whom a CVAD had not been planned before chemotherapy and for 88.4% of patients for whom chemotherapy was planned without the use of a CVAD. CONCLUSION: XELOX chemotherapy without a CVAD is a feasible approach for treating patients with stage III CC in the adjuvant setting.

Systemic treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: from disillusions to new horizons.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive malignancy, which accounts for a third of all cancer deaths globally each year. The management of patients with HCC is complex, as both the tumour stage and any underlying liver disease must be considered conjointly. Since the approval of sorafenib in advanced HCC, several phase III clinical trials have failed to demonstrate any superiority over sorafenib in the frontline setting, and no agent has been shown to impact outcomes after sorafenib failure. This review will focus on the range of experimental therapeutics for patients with advanced HCC and highlight the successes and failures of these treatments as well as areas for future development. Specifics such as dose limiting toxicity and safety profile in patients with liver dysfunction related to the underlying chronic liver disease should be considered when developing therapies in HCC. Finally, robust validated and reproducible surrogate end-points as well as predictive biomarkers should be defined in future randomised trials.

A simple tumor load-based nomogram for surgery in patients with colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases.

BACKGROUND: The decision to perform optimal surgery when peritoneal metastases (PM) are associated with liver metastases (LM) is extremely complex. No guidelines exist. The purpose of this study was to present a simple and useful statistical tool that generates a graphical calculator (nomogram) to help the clinician rapidly estimate individualized patient-specific survival before undergoing optimal surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An analysis of 287 patients with liver metastasis (LM), 119 patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM), and 37 patients with LM + PM, who underwent optimal surgery plus chemotherapy between 1995 and 2010 was performed. A minimal number of parameters were taken into account to obtain a nomogram that would be very simple to use. With the overall tumor load as the main prognostic factor, we included the number of lesions for LM and the peritoneal carcinomatosis score (PCI) for PM. The Cox model was used to generate the nomogram. RESULTS: The 5-year overall survival was, respectively, 38.5, 36.5, and 26.4 % in the LM group, the PM group, and the LM + PM group. The summation of 3 parameters (the number of LM, the PCI, and the type of surgery [liver resection, HIPEC, or both]), makes it easy to calculate a score that graphically corresponds to an estimation of survival after optimal surgery (nomogram). It can be used for LM alone, PM alone, or both. CONCLUSIONS: A graphic nomogram that is simple to calculate and easy to use enables us to rapidly appreciate the prognosis of patients according to the number of LM, the PCI, or both. This nomogram must be validated in prospective studies in other tertiary centers.

Ovarian metastasis is associated with retroperitoneal lymph node relapses in women treated for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis.

PURPOSE: To analyze the patterns of recurrence and the prognostic impact of ovarian metastases (OM) in a population of women with colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) treated with curative intent. METHODS: Data from all consecutive women with CRPC who underwent curatively intended complete cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy at our institution were retrieved from a prospective database. A bilateral oophorectomy or a complementary unilateral oophorectomy was systematically performed during CRS. RESULTS: From 1994 to 2009, among 105 women who underwent CRS plus intraperitoneal chemotherapy for CRPC, 62 (60 %) had OM. Women with and without OM had comparable peritoneal cancer index (PCI) scores (10 vs. 12, respectively, p = 0.09). After a median follow-up of 60 (range 5-145) months, median overall survival of women with OM did not differ statistically from that of women without OM (respectively, 36 and 40 months; p = 0.75). Relapses occurred in 82 % of the patients, distributed similarly between the two groups except for retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence, which occurred in 19 patients (18 %), including 18 with OM. The only predictive factor for a retroperitoneal relapse was a history of OM (p = 0.0012). CONCLUSIONS: Retroperitoneal lymph node recurrence seems to be linked to OM originating from colorectal cancer and could worsen the prognosis. A systematic lymphadenectomy could be evaluated in women with isolated OM or very limited peritoneal carcinomatosis to analyze the incidence of invaded lymph nodes and study its potential benefit on survival.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of colorectal liver metastases in patients at high risk of hepatic recurrence: a comparative study between hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin and modern systemic chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: After curatively intended surgery for colorectal liver metastases, liver recurrences occur in more than 60% of patients, despite the administration of adjuvant systemic chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to assess the benefit of combined adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) and intravenous (IV) 5-FU compared with standard modern adjuvant IV chemotherapy in patients at high risk of hepatic recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2009, 98 patients, who had undergone curative resection of at least 4 colorectal liver metastases, were selected from a prospective database. Among them, 44 (45%) had received postoperative HAI combined with systemic 5-FU (HAI group) and 54 (55%) had received "modern" systemic chemotherapy (IV group). RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar in terms of age, sex, the stage of the primary, and the administration of preoperative chemotherapy. The median number of HAI cycles received per patient was 7 [range, 1-12]. Twenty-nine patients (66%) had received at least 6 cycles of HAI oxaliplatin, and 22 patients (50%) had received the full planned treatment. For the remaining 22 patients (50%), HAI chemotherapy had been discontinued because of toxicity (n = 8), HAI catheter dysfunction (n = 6), an early recurrence (n = 6), and patient's refusal (n = 2). After a median follow-up of 60 months (51-81 months), 3-year overall survival was slightly higher in the HAI group (75% vs 62%, P = 0.17). Three-year disease-free survival was significantly longer in patients in the HAI group than those in the IV group (33% vs 5%, P < 0.0001). In the multivariate analysis, adjuvant HAI chemotherapy and an R0 resection margin status were the only independent predictive factors for prolonged disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative HAI oxaliplatin combined with systemic chemotherapy after curatively intended surgery of colorectal liver metastases is feasible and may significantly improve disease-free survival of patients at high risk of hepatic recurrence compared with adjuvant modern systemic chemotherapy alone. These results should be confirmed in a randomized study.

Liver/biliary injuries following chemoembolisation of endocrine tumours and hepatocellular carcinoma: lipiodol vs. drug-eluting beads.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is usually performed by injecting an emulsion of a drug and iodised oil. Drug-eluting beads (DEBs) have undeniable pharmacological advantages by offering simultaneous embolisation and sustained release of the drug to the tumour. No data are currently available on liver/biliary injury following DEB-TACE. This study describes and compares liver/biliary injuries encountered with TACE in tumours developed in cirrhotic (hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)) and non-cirrhotic (endocrine tumours (NETs)) livers. METHODS: In consecutive patients treated for a well-differentiated metastatic NET (n=120) or a HCC (n=88), 684 CT- and MR-scans were analysed. Liver/biliary injuries were classified as follows: dilated bile duct, portal vein narrowing, portal venous thrombosis and biloma/liver infarct. A generalised estimating equation logistic regression model was used. RESULTS: A liver/biliary injury followed 17.2% (82/476) of sessions in 30.8% (64/208) of patients. The occurrence of liver/biliary injury was associated with DEB-TACE (OR=6.63; p<0.001) irrespectively of the tumour type. Biloma/parenchymal infarct was strongly associated with both DEB-TACE (OR=9.78; p=0.002) and NETs (OR: 8.13; p=0.04). Biloma/liver infarcts were managed conservatively but were associated with an increase in serum levels of aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatases, and gamma glutamyl transpeptidase (p=0.005, p=0.005, p=0.012, and p=0.006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Liver/biliary injuries are independently associated with DEB-TACE. Biloma/liver infarct, the most serious injury, is independently associated with both DEB-TACE and NETs. The absence of such an association in TACE of HCC may be explained by the hypertrophied peribiliary plexus observed in cirrhosis, which protects against the ischemic/chemical insult of bile ducts. We suggest caution when using DEB-TACE in the non-cirrhotic liver.

Defective mismatch repair status as a prognostic biomarker of disease-free survival in stage III colon cancer patients treated with adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Adding oxaliplatin to adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy improves 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) after resection of stage III colon cancer. Several studies suggest that patients with tumors exhibiting defective mismatch repair (MMR) do not benefit from adjuvant 5-FU chemotherapy, but there are few data on 5-FU-oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of MMR status for DFS in patients with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: MMR status was determined by microsatellite instability testing or immunohistochemistry in 303 unselected patients with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy in 9 centers. Cox proportional hazards models were used to examine the association between MMR status and 3-year DFS. RESULTS: The 3-year DFS rate was significantly higher in the 34 patients (11.2% of the study population) with defective MMR tumors (90.5%) than in patients with proficient MMR tumors (73.8%; log-rank test; HR = 2.16; 95% CI, 1.09-4.27; P = 0.027). In multivariate analysis, MMR status remained an independent significant prognostic factor for DFS (HR = 4.48; 95% CI, 1.34-14.99; P = 0.015). CONCLUSION: MMR status is an independent prognostic biomarker for DFS in patients with stage III colon cancer receiving adjuvant FOLFOX chemotherapy.

Sequential versus combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (FFCD 2000-05): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimum use of cytotoxic drugs for advanced colorectal cancer has not been defined. Our aim was to investigate whether combination treatment is better than the sequential administration of the same drugs in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients (1:1 ratio) with advanced, measurable, non-resectable colorectal cancer and WHO performance status 0-2 to receive either first-line treatment with bolus (400 mg/m(2)) and infusional (2400 mg/m(2)) fluorouracil plus leucovorin (400 mg/m(2)) (simplified LV5FU2 regimen), second-line LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) (FOLFOX6), and third-line LV5FU2 plus irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) (FOLFIRI) or first-line FOLFOX6 and second-line FOLFIRI. Chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks. Randomisation was done centrally using minimisation (minimisation factors were WHO performance status, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, number of disease sites, and centre). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival after two lines of treatment. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00126256. FINDINGS: 205 patients were randomly assigned to the sequential group and 205 to the combination group. 161 (79%) patients in the sequential group and 161 (79%) in the combination group died during the study. Median progression-free survival after two lines was 10·5 months (95% CI 9·6-11·5) in the sequential group and 10·3 months (9·0-11·9) in the combination group (hazard ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·77-1·16; p=0·61). All six deaths caused by toxic effects of treatment occurred in the combination group. During first-line chemotherapy, significantly fewer severe (grade 3-4) haematological adverse events (12 events in 203 patients in sequential group vs 83 events in 203 patients in combination group; p<0·0001) and non-haematological adverse events (26 events vs 186 events; p<0·0001) occurred in the sequential group than in the combination group. INTERPRETATION: Upfront combination chemotherapy is more toxic and is not more effective than the sequential use of the same cytotoxic drugs in patients with advanced, non-resectable colorectal cancer. FUNDING: Sanofi-Aventis France.

Nutritional status affects treatment tolerability and survival in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: results of an AGEO prospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The possible impact of malnutrition on the tolerability and efficacy of modern chemotherapy regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is unclear. METHODS: In this prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study, we collected demographic, oncological and nutritional data for all consecutive mCRC patients during a 14-day period in eight hospitals. Nutritional status was assessed with the nutritional risk index (NRI), and patients were classified as severely malnourished when NRI was <83.5; drug-induced toxicities were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (version 3.0). Survival times were calculated from the date of the nutritional assessment. RESULTS: We enrolled 114 mCRC patients (median age: 65 years, range: 22-92; WHO performance status 0/1/2/3: 21/54/21/4%) of whom 88% had at least 2 metastatic sites and 49% were receiving chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Malnutrition was diagnosed in 65% of the patients and was severe in 19%. Severe malnutrition was associated with more adverse effects following chemotherapy (p = 0.01) and with shorter median overall survival (14.0 vs. 36.2 months in non-/moderately malnourished patients, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In mCRC patients, severe malnutrition is associated with greater chemotherapy toxicity and reduced overall survival.

Prolonged survival of initially unresectable hepatic colorectal cancer patients treated with hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin followed by radical surgery of metastases.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) of oxaliplatin with systemic 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin on patients with isolated unresectable liver metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 87 patients treated in our hospital with HAI of oxaliplatin with systemic 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin for isolated unresectable colorectal liver metastases from May 1999 to May 2007 were extracted from a prospective database and analyzed. The resectability rate, perioperative findings, postoperative outcomes, and long-term follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: HAI was delivered after failure of previous systemic chemotherapy in 69 patients (79%). The main criterion for unresectability was massive liver involvement (86% of patients). Most patients had synchronous (85%), bilateral metastases (89%). The median number of HAI courses was 8 (0-25). About 31 patients experienced technical catheter-related problems, which were responsible for withdrawal of HAI in only 7 patients (8%). Finally, a total of 23 patients (26%) were operated on, and resection or radiofrequency ablation was performed in 21 patients (24%). No postoperative mortality was observed and the morbidity rate was 35%. Five-year overall survival was 56% in the surgery group versus none in the nonsurgery group (P < 0.0001). After a median follow-up of 63 months, intrahepatic recurrence occurred in 10 patients among the 23 operated patients. CONCLUSIONS: HAI of oxaliplatin with systemic 5-Fluorouracil and leucovorin offers a second chance to remove initially unresectable isolated colorectal liver metastases in 24% of patients, and appears to be more efficient when performed as first-line therapy. Long-term overall survival can be obtained with this approach.

The long-term impact of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy on survivors treated for peritoneal carcinomatosis: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after complete surgical resection is currently accepted as a therapeutic option for peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, considerable morbidity is reported after HIPEC. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the impact of HIPEC on the quality of life (QoL) of survivors without recurrences of disease according to socio-demographic and medical variables. For that purpose, HIPEC was used as a global concept including the surgical procedure effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed by analyzing questionnaires concerning socio-demographic data, the psychological status, and general and specific QoL scores. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (86% of those contacted) completed and returned mailed questionnaires. For 19/21 QoL dimensions explored, survivors reported good to very good QoL with a median score >/=67%. The two adversely affected dimensions were future prospects and sexual functioning with a mean score of 57% and 23%, respectively. The burden of carcinomatosis, evaluated by a peritoneal index, was not correlated with statistically identified sequels in QoL. The extent of morbidity due to HIPEC, evaluated by the hospital stay, was statistically correlated with only one score, namely, embarrassment during social activities (p = 0.01) but not during familial life. CONCLUSIONS: Even though HIPEC is considered as an aggressive treatment, survivors reported good to very good QoL. However, specific care for the psychological aspect, as reflected by anxiety regarding future prospects and sexual activity, needs to be developed for survivors.

Combination chemotherapy in advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and either platinum compounds or irinotecan in patients with advanced small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA), for whom data on the efficacy of chemotherapy are scarce. METHODS: We reviewed data on all patients with advanced SBA who received chemotherapy over a 9-year period at our institution. RESULTS: Twenty patients with advanced SBA received a median of 6 cycles (range 2-15) of chemotherapy with 5-FU and either cisplatin (n=15), carboplatin (n=2), or oxaliplatin (n=3). The overall response rate was 21%, and median progression-free and overall survival 8 and 14 months, respectively. Toxicity was moderate. Second-line chemotherapy with 5-FU and irinotecan resulted in disease stabilization in 4 (50%) of 8 patients (median progression-free survival: 5 months), and in a biological complete response in another patient with non-measurable peritoneal carcinomatosis, allowing surgical cytoreduction surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. No tumor response or disease stabilization was seen among the patients who received protracted venous infusion of 5-FU (n=4) or infusional 5-FU and cisplatin (n=1) as second-line chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: Chemotherapy with 5-FU and platinum compounds seems effective and well-tolerated in patients with advanced SBA. 5-FU-irinotecan combination chemotherapy deserves further investigation in the first-line setting.

Impact of the extent and duration of cytoreductive surgery on postoperative hematological toxicity after intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia for peritoneal carcinomatosis.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is a major disease, currently treated using complete cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemohyperthermia (IPCH). Morbidity is a significant limitation of this procedure, usually related to the extent of surgery, and hematological toxicity, which is considered as dependent upon the chemotherapy dosage alone. The aim of our study was to investigate whether surgery alone had an impact on the hematological toxicity associated with the standardized drug protocol that we routinely prescribed. METHODS: Data were prospectively recorded from 83 consecutive patients who underwent complete cytoreductive surgery followed by IPCH with intraperitoneal oxaliplatin (360 mg/m(2)) and irinotecan (360 mg/m(2)), in 2 L/m(2) of dextrose over 30 min at 42-45 degrees C, using the Coliseum technique. Sixty minutes prior to IPCH, patients also received an intravenous perfusion of leucovorin (20 mg/m(2)) and 5-fluorouravyl (400 mg/m(2)). The doses and volume of IPCH were determined on the basis of the body surface area, so that all patients received the same concentration of drugs. Severe aplasia were defined as a leucocyte count of <500/ml, platelets <50,000/ml, and reticulocytes <6.5 g Hb/L. RESULTS: Postoperatively, severe aplasia was seen in 40 of the 83 patients (48%). There was no difference in the characteristics of patients with and without aplasia, other than the extent of surgery. The incidence of severe aplasia was only related to the duration of surgery (537 min in the aplastic group versus 444 min in the non aplastic group) (P = 0.002), and to the extent of the peritoneal disease (peritoneal index of 19.5 in the aplastic group, vs. 15.3 in the nonaplastic group) (P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: We report for the first time that the duration of surgery may increase the incidence of hematological toxicity following intraperitoneal chemotherapy. We also hypothesized that intra- and postoperative transient biochemical disorders, such as hypoalbuminemia, hemodilution, liver, and renal insufficiency and stress can be involved in this process. These hypotheses may allow improved postoperative care.