Experience with intraarterial infusion of styrene maleic acid neocarzinostatin (SMANCS)-lipiodol in pancreatic cancer.

A 54 year-old man was admitted to our hospital and diagnosed with inoperable cancer in the body and tail of the pancreas. The spleen was embolized at its hilum with a coil to infuse an anti-tumor agent selectively into the pancreatic parenchyma and transcatheter intraarterial infusion (TAI) of styrene maleic acid neocarzinostatin (SMANCS)-Lipiodol, 3 mg, was performed. The computed tomography (CT) scan taken immediately after TAI revealed the incorporation of SMANCS-Lipiodol into the site of the pancreatic tail. At 2 weeks, a small amount of SMANCS-Lipiodol remained and clearness of the tumor margin was lacking in the pancreatic tail, but no remarkable change was noted in the body. As for the laboratory data, pancreatic enzyme level was not elevated immediately after TAI. At 2 weeks, tumor markers showed improvement in CEA (3.9-->2.6 ng/ml) and Elastase 1 (370-->230 ng/ml), but little change was seen in CA 19-9 (1600 U/ml: no change) and DUPAN-2 (730-->740 U/ml). In pancreatic cancer, SMANCS-Lipiodol could be infused from the splenic artery into the pancreatic parenchyma by the splenic arterial embolization.

Indication of chemoembolization therapy without gelatin sponge for hepatocellular carcinoma.

This study evaluated the effect of chemoembolization (C-LIP) consisting of ethiodized oil (Lipiodol Ultra Fluid; André Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France) and epirubicin, without gelatin sponge on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), administered by hepatic arterial infusion. We analyzed the cases from two points of view: the local recurrence rate for hypervascular solitary small HCC (tumor size: < or =3 cm in diameter) and the cumulative survival rate for advanced HCC (stage VI according to the criteria of Liver Cancer Group of Japan) following C-LIP therapy. The C-LIP also was compared with transcather arterial embolization (TAE; C-LIP followed by gelatin sponge) and percutaneous ethanol injection therapy (PEIT). In the small HCC cases, the recurrence rate at 1 year after C-LIP was 77% (10 of 13 patients), while the local recurrence rate was 46% (six of 13 patients) at 6 months and 61% (eight of 13 patients) at 1 year. The local recurrence rate at 1 year was 29% (four of 14 patients) after TAE and 20% (three of 15 patients) after PEIT. These results showed that the effect of local anticancer therapy by C-LIP was not as potent as that of TAE or PEIT. In advanced HCC cases, the cumulative survival rate for 13 patients treated by C-LIP was 72% at 6 months, 36% at 1 year, and 14% at 2 years. However, the survival rates for 13 patients at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after TAE were 46%, 23%, and 8%, respectively. There was no difference between the C-LIP patients and TAE patients with regard to the pretreatment liver function. Three patients died within 2 months after the initial TAE. These deaths were mainly due to damage to the noncancerous liver parenchyma. Therapy with C-LIP alone was not appropriate for hypervascular solitary small HCCs, and additional treatment was necessary. We think C-LIP therapy should be selected instead of TAE for advanced HCCs to avoid severe parenchymal damage.