Statistical analysis plan for the randomized controlled trial CardioCare MV investigating a novel integrated care concept (NICC) for patients suffering from chronic cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases are the major cause of death globally and represent a major economic burden on health care systems. For patients with heart failure, atrial fibrillation or therapy-resistant hypertension, we have developed a novel integrated care concept (NICC) which combines telemedicine with intensive support by a care center, including a call center, an integrated care network including inpatient and outpatient care providers and guideline therapy for patients (Schmidt et al. 2018 Trials 19:120). Here, we describe challenges and solutions in patient recruitment and provide the statistical analysis plan. METHODS: The study CardioCare MV is a prospective, randomized, controlled, parallel-group, open-label, bi-center trial with two groups for comparing NICC with standard of care (SoC). Because of issues with patient enrollment we adapted the study plan after consultation with the Ethics Committee and the funding agency. We altered the analysis strategy for the primary endpoints, which led to a change in the required sample size. We also changed the access points to patients from inpatient hospitals specialized in the treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease to specialized practices. RESULTS: Recruitment of patients started on 1 December 2017, and first patient in was on 4 December 2017. Recruitment was completed on 15 August 2019 as planned according to the amended study plan. The follow-up period will end in August 2020. A total of 964 patients was enrolled into the trial. The statistical analysis plan was finalized prior to last patient in. Results will be available by the end of 2020. DISCUSSION: The trial will inform care providers whether quality of care can be improved by an integrated care concept providing telemedicine through a round-the-clock call center approach. We expect that cost of the NICC will be lower than standard care because of reduced hospitalizations. The trial will guide additional research to disentangle the effects of this complex intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS, ID: DRKS00013124. Registered on 5 October 2017 ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03317951. Registered on 17 October 2017.

A novel integrated care concept (NICC) versus standard care in the treatment of chronic cardiovascular diseases: protocol for the randomized controlled trial CardioCare MV.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular diseases are the major cause of death globally and represent a major economic burden on health care systems. Positive effects of disease management programs have been shown for patients with heart failure (HF). Remote monitoring and telemonitoring with active intervention are beneficial in atrial fibrillation (AF) and therapy-resistant hypertension (TRH), respectively. For these patients, we have developed a novel integrated care concept (NICC) which combines telemedicine with intensive support by a care center, including a call center, an integrated care network including inpatient and outpatient care providers and guideline therapy for patients. METHODS: The aim of the study is to demonstrate the superiority of NICC over guideline therapy alone. The trial is designed as open-label, bi-center, parallel-group design with two groups and a blinded observer. Patients will be included if they are either inpatients or if they are referred to the outpatient clinic of the hospitals by their treating physician. Randomization will be done individually with stratification by cardiovascular disease (AF, HF, TRH), center and admission type. Primary endpoints are based on the 1-year observation period after randomization. The first primary endpoint is the composite endpoint consisting of mortality, stroke and myocardial infarction. The number of hospitalizations form the second primary endpoint. The third primary endpoint is identical to the first primary endpoint plus cardiac decompensation. Adjustments for multiple testing are done using a fall-back strategy. Secondary endpoints include patient adherence, health care costs, quality of life, and safety. A sample size of 2930 gives 80% power at the two-sided 2.5% test level for the first primary endpoint. The power for the second primary endpoint is 99.8% at this sample size, and it is 80% with 1086 patients. DISCUSSION: This study will inform care providers whether quality of care can be improved by an integrated care concept providing telemedicine through a round-the-clock call center approach. We expect that cost of the NICC will be lower than standard care because of reduced hospitalizations. If the study has a positive result, NICC is planned to be immediately rolled out in the federal state of Mecklenburg-West Pomerania and other federal states in Germany. The trial will also guide additional research to disentangle the effects of this complex intervention. TRIAL REGISTRATION: DRKS, ID: DRKS00013124 . Registered on 5 October 2017; ClinicalTrials.gov , ID: NCT03317951. Registered on 17 October 2017.

Rocuronium is more hepatotoxic than succinylcholine in vitro.

BACKGROUND: The development of liver failure is a major problem in critically ill patients. The hepatotoxicity of many drugs, as one important reason for liver failure, is poorly screened for in human models. Rocuronium and succinylcholine are neuromuscular blocking agents used for tracheal intubation and for rapid-sequence induction. OBJECTIVE: We used an in-vitro test with a permanent cell line and compared rocuronium and succinylcholine for hepatotoxicity. DESIGN: In-vitro study. SETTING: A basic science laboratory, University Hospital Rostock, Germany. MATERIAL/(PATIENTS): The basic test compound is the permanent human liver cell line HepG2/C3A. In a standardised microtitre plate assay the toxicity of different concentrations of rocuronium, succinylcholine and plasma control was tested. INTERVENTIONS: After two incubation periods of 3 days, the viability of cells (XTT test, lactate dehydrogenase release and trypan blue staining), micro-albumin synthesis and the cytochrome 1A2 activity (metabolism of ethoxyresorufin) were measured. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Differences between rocuronium and succinylcholine were assessed using the Kruskal-Wallis one-way test and two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Rocuronium, but not succinylcholine, led to a significant dose-dependent decrease of viability, albumin synthesis and cytochrome 1A2 activity of test cells. CONCLUSION: An in-vitro test with a cell line showed hepatotoxicity of rocuronium that was dose-dependent. Further studies are needed to investigate the underlying mechanisms of the effects of rocuronium on hepatic cellular integrity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not suitable.