[What's new in acne? New therapeutic approaches]. / Quoi de neuf dans l'acné ? Nouvelles approches thérapeutiques.

Well-known topical and systemic treatments for acne have advanced little over the last 10 years. However, many therapeutic approaches are being evaluated both in terms of topical and systemic treatments. The purpose of this paper is to show the progress of innovative drug projects in treating acne. The topical use of new formulations using lipid nanoparticles and microspheres could help for new products based on anti-androgens or retinoids more concentrated and better tolerated. New active agents such as topical antimicrobial peptides, inhibitors of ectopeptidase, omiganan pentahydrochloride, antisense oligonucleotides, lauric acid are many original ways to explore for the treatment of acne. New treatment regimens for doxycycline and isotretinoin would increase tolerance. Dapsone has been evaluated for isotretinoin-resistant forms. Phototherapy narrowband light (blue or red) can find its place in the strategy for the management of acne. Finally, acne vaccines could be developed too.

Current European practice in immune tolerance induction therapy in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors.

The management of patients with inhibitors is an important challenge in haemophilia care. The lack of randomized controlled trials means that clinical decisions are generally based on subjective opinions, and purchasers' attention is likely to focus on the costs of treatment. In order to assess the current management of inhibitor patients and use of immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI) in Europe, we performed a survey within a European network of 21 comprehensive care centres from 14 countries (the European Haemophilia Therapy Standardisation Board). The survey identified a total of 381 patients with inhibitors attending the centres, 211 (55.4%) of whom had never been exposed to ITI. Between 1998 and 2003, the centres performed 233 procedures and 114 (48.9%) were successful. The survey demonstrated that dosing, which is the time to start and stop the ITI, the type of concentrate to use and the definition of success varied among the centres. Well-designed trials are warranted to guide decision-making, but in the absence of these studies we have developed consensus guidance for the management of inhibitor patients based on current clinical practice, as identified by the survey, and review of the literature.

Quality of life assessment in clinical practice in haemophilia treatment.

The modern management of haemophilia has greatly influenced not only survival of patients, their clinical symptoms and orthopaedic outcome but also their perceived quality of life (QoL). QoL measures recently became an essential part of clinical trials being one of the most important patient-rated outcomes (PROs). Moreover, QoL assessment is essential in pharmacoeconomics. In clinical trials, not only clinical outcomes but also the so-called PROs and health-economic outcomes are included. Different types of economic evaluations may be conducted in order to describe the economic burden of a disease condition, to determine the cost of care and to assess and evaluate alternative treatments in terms of both costs and effects as well as benefits and outcomes with the aim of optimizing the use of resources. For these evaluations, the following analyses are performed: descriptive cost of illness study, incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, incremental cost-utility analysis and incremental cost-benefit analysis. By contrast, PROs are derived from direct patient reports and they allow to evaluate the impact of a disease and its treatment on patients' well-being and functioning. PROs include health-related quality of life, patient preferences/utilities, treatment satisfaction and other PROs such as functional assessment, etc. Choosing a QoL measure, study- and instrument-related aspects have to be taken into account. Finally, QoL assessment will become a part of the regular clinical assessment of persons with haemophilia, in order to provide trustworthy data of perceived well-being to be compared over time and in order to assess treatment efficacy and quality of care.