Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Arq Bras Oftalmol ; 84(2): 179-182, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33567015

RESUMEN

Microperimetry biofeedback training is a vision rehabilitation method that involves the training of attention and oculomotor control, and the rehabilitation of poorly located and non-functional preferred retinal loci. It can significantly improve distance and near visual acuity in age-related macular degeneration. Previous studies have shown that biofeedback training using electrical nystagmography can reduce nystagmus amplitude and increase foveation time. However, these improvements have not been sustained following training sessions. We hereby report a pediatric case of idiopathic nystagmus in an 11-year old patient treated with microperimetric biofeedback to improve visual acuity and fixation stability. The training had a beneficial impact, positively affecting fixation stability as well as distance and near reading vision. Subjectively, improvement in quality of life was also reported. Conversely to previous studies, the positive effects in this case were maintained for as long as twelve months following therapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case with long-term benefits to be reported in the literature.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración Macular , Baja Visión , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica , Niño , Humanos , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Degeneración Macular/terapia , Calidad de Vida , Agudeza Visual
2.
Eur J Ophthalmol ; 31(6): 3324-3331, 2021 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33499653

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Biofeedback training (BT) was adapted to idiopathic infantile nystagmus syndrome (IINS) cases to enhance visual functions and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: 10 patients (age 9 ± 3.2 years) treated with the audio-visual BT module of the MAIA microperimeter (Centervue, Padova, Italy) were assessed in two baseline visits and 1week post-BT (BT 80 min in total). The outcomes were distance and near binocular best corrected visual acuity (BBCVA), fixation stability, reading speed, contrast sensitivity, stereopsis and Children's Visual Function Questionnaire. One-way repeated measured ANOVA and paired t-tests were used. RESULTS: Distance BBCVA improved from 0.46 ± 0.21 and 0.43 ± 0.18 pre-BT to 0.33 ± 0.2 logMAR post-BT (F (2,27) = 13.75, p = 0.0002). Post-BT was better than baseline (p = 0.0001) and pre-BT (p = 0.001). Near BBCVA improved from 0.23 ± 0.09 and 0.21 ± 0.14 pre-BT to 0.04 ± 0.08 post-BT (F (2,27) = 22.12, p = 0.000014), post-BT was better than baseline (p = 0.0001) and pre-BT (p = 0.0006). Stereopsis improved from 283 ± 338″ to 39 ± 32.2″ (p = 0.04), contrast sensitivity from 0.26 ± 0.17 to 0.08 ± 0.12 log units (p = 0.01), and reading speed improved from 74.7 ± 51.2 wpm to 104.7 ± 53.6 wpm (p = 0.0006). Fixation stability improved from 33.6 ± 28.1 to 14.3 ± 10.1 sq. QoL increased from 23.8 ± 2.2 to 26.3 ± 2.3 units (p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: BT benefited all visual functions and QoL in this pilot study, heralding a new possibility for Low Vision Rehabilitation in IINS.


Asunto(s)
Biorretroalimentación Psicológica , Calidad de Vida , Niño , Preescolar , Enfermedades Genéticas Ligadas al Cromosoma X , Humanos , Nistagmo Congénito , Proyectos Piloto , Agudeza Visual
3.
Retina ; 40(8): 1471-1482, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31404033

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The LIGHTSITE I study investigated the efficacy and safety of photobiomodulation (PBM) treatment in subjects with dry age-related macular degeneration. METHODS: Thirty subjects (46 eyes) were treated with the Valeda Light Delivery System, wherein subjects underwent two series of treatments (3× per week for 3-4 weeks) over 1 year. Outcome measures included best-corrected visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, microperimetry, central drusen volume and drusen thickness, and quality of life assessments. RESULTS: Photobiomodulation-treated subjects showed a best-corrected visual acuity mean letter score gain of 4 letters immediately after each treatment series at Month 1 (M1) and Month 7 (M7). Approximately 50% of PBM-treated subjects showed improvement of ≥5 letters versus 13.6% in sham-treated subjects at M1. High responding subjects (≥5-letter improvement) in the PBM-treated group showed a gain of 8 letters after initial treatment (P < 0.01) and exhibited earlier stages of age-related macular degeneration disease. Statistically significant improvements in contrast sensitivity, central drusen volume, central drusen thickness, and quality of life were observed (P < 0.05). No device-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Photobiomodulation treatment statistically improved clinical and anatomical outcomes with more robust benefits observed in subjects with earlier stages of dry age-related macular degeneration. Repeated PBM treatments are necessary to maintain benefits. These pilot findings support previous reports and suggest the utility of PBM as a safe and effective therapy in subjects with dry age-related macular degeneration.


Asunto(s)
Atrofia Geográfica/radioterapia , Terapia por Luz de Baja Intensidad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Sensibilidad de Contraste/fisiología , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Atrofia Geográfica/diagnóstico , Atrofia Geográfica/fisiopatología , Atrofia Geográfica/psicología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Drusas Retinianas/patología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Pruebas del Campo Visual , Campos Visuales/fisiología
4.
Can J Ophthalmol ; 54(3): 328-334, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31109472

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Biofeedback training (BT) is a modern method for enhancing the use of preferred retinal loci (PRL) retraining for new retinal loci (TRL), hence improving far and near vision. This article attempts to clarify the optimal methodology for BT and the types of patients who can benefit most from BT. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of cases who received BT with the macular integrity assessment (MAIA) microperimetre. Outcome measures selected for analysis were visual acuity, PRL location, fixation stability, fixation pattern orientation, reading acuity, critical print size, and reading speed. RESULTS: Out of 30 cases who received BT, only those with age-related macular degeneration and visual acuity of logMAR 0.8 (20/126) or poorer showed a visual acuity gain (statistically significant of 12 letters) after BT. Those with other diagnoses and those with residual Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study best-corrected visual acuity of logMAR of 0.7 (20/100) or better showed only positive trends for visual acuity and a negative trend for fixation stability. All subjects showed a shift in PRL location toward the superior quadrant of the retina (p < 0.02) in those who received BT. CONCLUSION: BT seems to offer patients a unique and efficient modality to improve distance vision outside of using optical devices.


Asunto(s)
Biorretroalimentación Psicológica/métodos , Degeneración Macular/rehabilitación , Lectura , Agudeza Visual , Campos Visuales/fisiología , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Degeneración Macular/diagnóstico , Degeneración Macular/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pruebas del Campo Visual
6.
Vis Neurosci ; 26(5-6): 487-94, 2009 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20003597

RESUMEN

The aim of this study was to explore the plasticity of fixation in patients with central vision loss. Most of these patients use preferred retinal loci (PRLs) in the healthy eccentric part of the retina to fixate, but fixation stability and retinal location are not always optimal for best visual performance. This study examined whether fixation stability and a new PRL location can be trained and whether these changes in ocular motor control transfer into better reading performance. Six patients with age-related macular degeneration participated in the study. Fixation stability measurements, microperimetry, and auditory biofeedback training were performed with the MP-1 microperimeter. The auditory biofeedback was used during five 1-h long training sessions to improve fixation and relocate the PRL. Fixation location and stability were recorded while viewing four different targets: a cross, a letter, a word, and a nine-cycle radial grating. Visual acuity was assessed with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart and reading performance with the MNRead test. The results showed that all patients developed a new PRL in an optimal location for reading, and they were able to use it consistently while viewing different targets. Fixation stability improved 53% after training. Learning transferred to the old PRL even though fixation stability at this location was not trained. All these improvements in ocular motor control translated into better reading performance: reading speed improved 38% and reading acuity and critical print size gained two lines. We conclude that the ability of the ocular motor system to fixate is flexible in patients with central vision loss: a new PRL can be trained, fixation stability can be improved, and learning transfers to an untrained location. These gains in ocular motor control result in better visual performance. This property can be successfully used to optimize the residual vision of patients with central vision loss.


Asunto(s)
Fijación Ocular , Degeneración Macular/fisiopatología , Baja Visión/fisiopatología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biorretroalimentación Psicológica , Femenino , Humanos , Aprendizaje , Degeneración Macular/complicaciones , Masculino , Reconocimiento Visual de Modelos , Estimulación Luminosa , Desempeño Psicomotor , Lectura , Retina/fisiopatología , Baja Visión/etiología , Agudeza Visual
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA