Long-term comparison of sublingual immunotherapy vs inhaled budesonide in patients with mild persistent asthma due to grass pollen.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have compared the effects of immunotherapy and inhaled steroids. The main limitation of such studies is the long duration required to fully appreciate the effects of immunotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of inhaled budesonide and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in mild persistent asthma for up to 5 years. METHODS: Patients with mild persistent asthma and rhinitis due to grass pollen were enrolled in an open randomized controlled trial. After a run-in season, they were randomized to either budesonide, 800 microg/d, in the pollen season or continuous grass SLIT for 5 years. All patients received rescue medications. Symptoms were evaluated by diary cards filled out from May to July at baseline and after 3 and 5 years. In-season nasal eosinophils and bronchial hyperresponsiveness were also assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients were enrolled and 46 completed the study. The bronchial symptom scores and the use of bronchodilators decreased significantly in both groups, but the improvement was greater in the SLIT patients at 3 and 5 years. The nasal symptom score and the intake of nasal steroids decreased only in the SLIT group, and the difference vs the budesonide group was always significant. In the SLIT group vs the budesonide group, a statistically significant decrease of nasal eosinophils was found at 3 and 5 years (P < .01). The bronchial hyperresponsiveness improved significantly only in the SLIT group. CONCLUSION: In patients with grass pollen-induced asthma, in the long term SLIT was equally effective as inhaled budesonide in treating bronchial symptoms and provided an additional benefit in treating rhinitis symptoms and bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Clinical, functional, and immunologic effects of sublingual immunotherapy in birch pollinosis: a 3-year randomized controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has been proved effective in allergic rhinitis, but there are few studies assessing its effects on inflammation and on the lower airways. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate at the same time the effects of SLIT on rhinitis symptoms, nasal inflammation, and lower airways function in patients with birch pollinosis. METHODS: Adult patients with rhinitis and asthma monosensitized to birch were evaluated during a run-in pollen season and then randomized to receive openly either drugs alone or drugs plus SLIT and reevaluated in the subsequent 4 pollen seasons. Rhinitis symptoms and consumption of bronchodilators were assessed by means of diary card. A nasal smear for eosinophil count was carried out in and out of pollen seasons, and pulmonary function tests with methacholine challenge were performed at each season. RESULTS: Of 79 enrolled patients, 27 dropped out, with a significantly higher rate of dropouts in the control group. There was a decrease in symptoms and bronchodilator use in the SLIT group versus the control group, becoming significant at the second and third pollen seasons, respectively ( P < .01 at all times). Nasal eosinophils decreased significantly in the active group, starting from the third pollen season ( P < .01). In the SLIT group a significant increase in FEV 1 , specific airways conductance, and maximal expiratory flow at 25% of forced vital capacity was seen starting from the second year and was associated with an increase in the methacholine threshold dose ( P < .01). The differences were significant also at the intragroup comparison over time. CONCLUSION: SLIT achieved a significant clinical benefit in birch pollinosis, reduced the eosinophil infiltration in nasal mucosa, and significantly improved pulmonary function during the pollen seasons.