RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Soluble complement receptor-1 (sCR1), a potent complement inhibitor, confers neuroprotection in a murine stroke model. Additional neuroprotective benefit is achieved by sLe x-glycosylation of sCR1. In an effort to translate sCR1-sLe x to clinical trials, we evaluated this agent in a primate stroke model. METHODS: Adult male baboons randomly received either sCR1-sLe x or vehicle. Stroke volume was assessed on day 3, and neurological examinations were conducted daily. Complement activity (CH50) was measured at 30 minute, 2, 6, 12 hour, 3, and 10 days post-ischemia. RESULTS: The experiment was terminated prematurely following an interim analysis. In a preliminary cohort (n = 3 per arm), infarct volume was greater in the treated animals. No difference in neurological score was found between groups. CH50 levels were significantly reduced in the sCR1sLe x-treated groups. A hypotensive response was also observed in animals treated with sCR1-sLe x. Conclusions Further work is necessary to explain the hypotensive response observed in primates prior to further clinical development of sCR1-sLe x.
Asunto(s)
Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Fármacos Neuroprotectores/administración & dosificación , Papio anubis , Receptores de Complemento/administración & dosificación , Daño por Reperfusión/prevención & control , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Animales , Isquemia Encefálica/prevención & control , Infarto Cerebral/prevención & control , Ensayo de Actividad Hemolítica de Complemento/veterinaria , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Masculino , Distribución Aleatoria , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECT: Postischemic cerebral inflammatory injury has been extensively investigated in an effort to develop effective neuroprotective agents. The complement cascade has emerged as an important contributor to postischemic neuronal injury. Soluble complement receptor Type 1 (sCR1), a potent inhibitor of complement activation, has been shown to reduce infarct volume and improve functional outcome after murine stroke. Given numerous high-profile failures to translate promising antiinflammatory strategies from the laboratory to the clinic and given the known species-specificity of the complement cascade, the authors sought to evaluate the neuroprotective effect of sCR1 in a nonhuman primate model of stroke. METHODS: A total of 48 adult male baboons (Papio anubis) were randomly assigned to receive 15 mg/kg of sCR1 or vehicle. The animals were subjected to 75 minutes of middle cerebral artery occlusion/reperfusion. Perioperative blood samples were analyzed for total complement activity by using a CH50 assay. Infarct volume and neurological scores were assessed at the time the animals were killed, and immunohistochemistry was used to determine cerebral drug penetration and C1q deposition. An interim futility analysis led to termination of the trial after study of 12 animals. Total serum complement activity was significantly depressed in the sCR1-treated animals compared with the controls. Immunostaining also demonstrated sCR1 deposition in the ischemic hemispheres of treated animals. Despite these findings, there were no significant differences in infarct volume or neurological score between the sCR1--and vehicle-treated cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: A preischemic bolus infusion of sCR1, the most effective means of administration in mice, was not neuroprotective in a primate model. This study illustrates the utility of a translational primate model of stroke in the assessment of promising antiischemic agents prior to implementation of large-scale clinical trials.