Curcumin: A therapeutic strategy for colorectal cancer?

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second cause of cancer death worldwide. The metastatic disease is mainly treated with aggressive therapies consisting on combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy plus anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF drugs. In spite of the improvements in clinical outcomes achieved in the last decade, these are the result of multiple new combinations using the existing therapeutic options and the introduction of regorafenib and TAS-102 in second or later lines of treatment. As immunotherapies are limited to less than 5% of CRC patients harboring tumors with deficient mismatch repair, there is an urgent need of finding new drugs to increase our patients' survival opportunities. Among all the natural products that are candidates to be used for the treatment of CRC cancer, curcumin (the golden spice) is in the spotlight. Used for centuries in the Ayurveda medicine, its demonstrated anticancer properties and low toxicity profile made it the focus of hundreds of preclinical and clinical investigations. So far we know that it can be combined with most of the aforementioned drugs in a safe and synergistic way. Regretfully, its poor bioavailability has been one of the main issues for its successful introduction in the clinic. Nevertheless, a plethora of new formulations with a huge increase in bioavailability are under study with promising results. In this review we discuss the possibility of incorporating curcumin in the treatment of CRC; specifically, we review preclinical and clinical data supporting its possible combination with current therapies as well as new formulations under clinical study. It is time for the golden spice revolution.

Nuclear IGF-1R predicts chemotherapy and targeted therapy resistance in metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although chemotherapy is the cornerstone treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), acquired chemoresistance is common and constitutes the main reason for treatment failure. Monoclonal antibodies against insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) have been tested in pre-treated mCRC patients, but results have been largely deceiving. METHODS: We analysed time to progression, overall survival, and the mutational status of RAS, BRAF and nuclear p-IGF-1R expression by immunohistochemistry, in 470 metastatic CRC patients. The effect of IGF-1R activation and distribution was also assessed using cellular models of CRC and RNAi for functional validation. RESULTS: Nuclear IGF-1R increased in metastatic tumours compared to paired untreated primary tumours, and significantly correlated with poor overall survival in mCRC patients. In vitro, chemo-resistant cell lines presented significantly higher levels of IGF-1R expression within the nuclear compartment, and PIAS3, a protein implicated also in the sumoylation process of intranuclear proteins, contributed to IGF-1R nuclear sequestration, highlighting the essential role of PIAS3 in this process. Intriguingly, we observed that ganitumab, an IGF-1R blocking-antibody used in several clinical trials, and dasatinib, an SRC inhibitor, increased the nuclear localisation of IGF-1R. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that IGF-1R nuclear location might lead to chemotherapy and targeted agent resistance.

Epigenetic inactivation of the BRCA1 interactor SRBC and resistance to oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: A major problem in cancer chemotherapy is the existence of primary resistance and/or the acquisition of secondary resistance. Many cellular defects contribute to chemoresistance, but epigenetic changes can also be a cause. METHODS: A DNA methylation microarray was used to identify epigenetic differences in oxaliplatin-sensitive and -resistant colorectal cancer cells. The candidate gene SRBC was validated by single-locus DNA methylation and expression techniques. Transfection and short hairpin experiments were used to assess oxaliplatin sensitivity. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in metastasic colorectal cancer patients were explored with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: We found that oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer cells depends on the DNA methylation-associated inactivation of the BRCA1 interactor SRBC gene. SRBC overexpression or depletion gives rise to sensitivity or resistance to oxaliplatin, respectively. SRBC epigenetic inactivation occurred in primary tumors from a discovery cohort of colorectal cancer patients (29.8%; n = 39 of 131), where it predicted shorter PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 2.92; log-rank P = .01), particularly in oxaliplatin-treated case subjects for which metastasis surgery was not indicated (HR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.13 to 3.40; log-rank P = .01). In a validation cohort of unresectable colorectal tumors treated with oxaliplatin (n = 58), SRBC hypermethylation was also associated with shorter PFS (HR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.60; log-rank P = .045). CONCLUSIONS: These results provide a basis for future clinical studies to validate SRBC hypermethylation as a predictive marker for oxaliplatin resistance in colorectal cancer.

Increased levels of copper efflux transporter ATP7B are associated with poor outcome in colorectal cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy.

Recently, the copper efflux transporters ATP7B and ATP7A have been implicated in the transport of and resistance to platinum drugs in breast and ovarian cancers. Because of the extensive use of oxaliplatin in colorectal cancer (CRC), we examined the expression of both transporters in tumors from CRC patients treated with oxaliplatin/5FU and sought to determine whether their expression can predict clinical outcome in these patients. ATP7B and ATP7A levels were determined by quantitative real-time PCR in 50 primary tumors of previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal adenocarcinoma who were subsequently treated with oxaliplatin/5FU. Additionally, ATP7B protein expression was assessed by immunohistochemical staining using a tissue microarray. Patients with the lowest mRNA expression levels of ATP7B had a significantly longer time to progression (TTP) (p = 0.0009) than patients with the highest levels (12.14 months vs. 6.43 months) who also had an increased risk of progression (HR = 3.56; 95% CI, 1.6-7.9; p = 0.002). Furthermore, patients with low levels of both protein and mRNA of ATP7B derived the maximum benefit from oxaliplatin/5FU with the longest TTP as compared with patients with high levels of ATP7B protein and mRNA (14.64 months vs. 4.63 months, respectively, p = 0.01) and showed a nonsignificant trend toward a lower response rate (37.5% and 75%, respectively). In conclusion, ATP7B mRNA and protein expression in colorectal tumors is associated with clinical outcome to oxaliplatin/5FU. Prospective studies are required to evaluate the role of this marker in tailoring chemotherapy.