Modelling the genesis and treatment of cancer: the potential role of physiologically based pharmacodynamics.

Physiologically based modelling of pharmacodynamics/toxicodynamics requires an a priori knowledge on the underlying mechanisms causing toxicity or causing the disease. In the context of cancer, the objective of the expert meeting was to discuss the molecular understanding of the disease, modelling approaches used so far to describe the process, preclinical models of cancer treatment and to evaluate modelling approaches developed based on improved knowledge. Molecular events in cancerogenesis can be detected using 'omics' technology, a tool applied in experimental carcinogenesis, but also for diagnostics and prognosis. The molecular understanding forms the basis for new drugs, for example targeting protein kinases specifically expressed in cancer. At present, empirical preclinical models of tumour growth are in great use as the development of physiological models is cost and resource intensive. Although a major challenge in PKPD modelling in oncology patients is the complexity of the system, based in part on preclinical models, successful models have been constructed describing the mechanism of action and providing a tool to establish levels of biomarker associated with efficacy and assisting in defining biologically effective dose range selection for first dose in man. To follow the concentration in the tumour compartment enables to link kinetics and dynamics. In order to obtain a reliable model of tumour growth dynamics and drug effects, specific aspects of the modelling of the concentration-effect relationship in cancer treatment that need to be accounted for include: the physiological/circadian rhythms of the cell cycle; the treatment with combinations and the need to optimally choose appropriate combinations of the multiple agents to study; and the schedule dependence of the response in the clinical situation.

The effect of folic acid supplementation on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral methotrexate during the remission-induction period of treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effect of folic acid (FA) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of low-dose oral methotrexate (MTX) during the remission-induction phase of psoriasis treatment. METHODS: In a 32-week, open-label, two-way cross-over study, patients (n=20, seven men, aged 35-70 years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis were randomly assigned to receive MTX plus FA (20 mg/week) for 16 weeks followed by MTX monotherapy (three doses of MTX separated by 12-h intervals once a week) for an additional 16 weeks (treatment arm A, n=10) or to receive the opposite sequence of treatments (arm B, n=10). Dosing of MTX was individualised with the help of pre-study evaluation of plasma MTX pharmacokinetics. The Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), biochemistry and haematology tests and erythrocyte concentration of MTX polyglutamates (MTXPG) were evaluated throughout the study. RESULTS: In arms A and B, the mean (range) concentrations of MTXPG (nmol/L) were comparable [week 16: 96.2 (32.0-157) vs. 111 (73.7-175), P=0.32; week 32: 103 (55.8-173) vs. 83.6 (27.4-129), P=0.24]. After 16 weeks, the mean+/-SEM PASI decreased from 20.1+/-2.1 to 8.8+/-1.3 in arm A, while a greater reduction from 27.2+/-2.1 to 5.1+/-1.0 occurred in arm B (P<0.001). Positive correlations were found between the percent improvement in PASI at week 16 and the ratios of the concentration of MTXPG to plasma folate (rho=0.59, P=0.008) or RBC folate concentration (rho=0.56, P=0.013). Due to an accelerated decline in PASI in arm A and a trend to its worsening in arm B after crossing over of treatments, the mean absolute PASI scores in both arms were comparable at week 32. CONCLUSION: The antipsoriatic effect of MTX during the remission-induction phase of treatment is influenced by folate status and may be significantly less if combined treatment with FA is used, irrespective of pre-treatment folate levels. The individual tailoring of MTX dosing needs further attention because the mean percent PASI improvement from baseline was 83% and the inter-patient variability in response was low after 16 weeks of monotherapy with MTX.