Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom ; 32(8): 1998-2012, 2021 Aug 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33513021

RESUMEN

The multi-attribute method (MAM) is a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based method that is used to directly characterize and monitor many product quality attributes and impurities on biotherapeutics, most commonly at the peptide level. It utilizes high-resolution accurate mass spectral data which are analyzed in an automated fashion. MAM is a promising approach that is intended to replace or supplement several conventional assays with a single LC-MS analysis and can be implemented in a Current Good Manufacturing Practice environment. MAM provides accurate site-specific quantitation information on targeted attributes and the nontargeted new peak detection function allows to detect new peaks as impurities, modifications, or sequence variants when comparing to a reference sample. The high resolution MAM workflow was applied here for three independent case studies. First, to monitor the behavior of monoclonal antibody product quality attributes over the course of a 12-day cell culture experiment providing an insight into the behavior and dynamics of product attributes throughout the process. Second, the workflow was applied to test the purity and identity of a product through analysis of samples spiked with host cell proteins. Third, through the comparison of a drug product and a biosimilar with known sequence variants. The three case studies presented here, clearly demonstrate the robustness and accuracy of the MAM workflow that implies suitability for deployment in the regulated environment.


Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/química , Cromatografía Liquida/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas/métodos , Animales , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/análisis , Técnicas de Cultivo Celular por Lotes/métodos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/análisis , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/química , Células CHO , Catepsina L/análisis , Catepsina L/química , Catepsina L/genética , Cricetulus , Contaminación de Medicamentos , Glicosilación , Inmunoglobulina G/análisis , Inmunoglobulina G/genética , Lipoproteína Lipasa/análisis , Lipoproteína Lipasa/química , Lipoproteína Lipasa/genética , Lisina/química , Control de Calidad , Proteínas Recombinantes/análisis , Proteínas Recombinantes/química , Proteínas Recombinantes/genética , Succinimidas/química , Tripsina/química , Flujo de Trabajo
2.
Eur Radiol ; 30(4): 2220-2230, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31844963

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Although image-guided interventional procedures of the elbow and wrist are routinely performed, there is poor evidence in the literature concerning such treatments. Our aim was to perform a Delphi-based consensus on published evidence on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist and provide clinical indications on this topic. METHODS: A board of 45 experts in image-guided interventional musculoskeletal procedures from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology were involved in this Delphi-based consensus study. All panelists reviewed and scored published papers on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist updated to September 2018 according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine levels of evidence. Consensus on statements drafted by the panelists about clinical indications was considered as "strong" when more than 95% of panelists agreed and as "broad" if more than 80% agreed. RESULTS: Eighteen statements were drafted, 12 about tendon procedures and 6 about intra-articular procedures. Only statement #15 reached the highest level of evidence (ultrasound-guided steroid wrist injections result in greater pain reduction and greater likelihood of attaining clinically important improvement). Seventeen statements received strong consensus (94%), while one received broad consensus (6%). CONCLUSIONS: There is still poor evidence in published papers on image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist. A strong consensus has been achieved in 17/18 (94%) statements provided by the panel on clinical indications. Large prospective randomized trials are needed to better define the role of these procedures in clinical practice. KEY POINTS: • The panel provided 18 evidence-based statements on clinical indications of image-guided interventional procedures around the elbow and wrist. • Only statement #15 reached the highest level of evidence: ultrasound-guided steroid wrist injections result in greater pain reduction and greater likelihood of attaining clinically important improvement. • Seventeen statements received strong consensus (94%), while broad consensus was obtained by 1 statement (6%).


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de De Quervain/terapia , Tendinopatía del Codo/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional , Trastorno del Dedo en Gatillo/terapia , Ultrasonografía Intervencional , Técnica Delphi , Punción Seca , Articulación del Codo , Fluoroscopía , Glucocorticoides/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Ácido Hialurónico/administración & dosificación , Inyecciones , Inyecciones Intraarticulares , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía , Tenotomía , Viscosuplementos/administración & dosificación , Articulación de la Muñeca
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA