Knowledge on intrapartum care practices among skilled birth attendants in Cambodia-a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Delivery is a critical moment for pregnant women and babies, and careful monitoring is essential throughout the delivery process. The partograph is a useful tool for monitoring and assessing labour progress as well as maternal and foetal conditions; however, it is often used inaccurately or inappropriately. A gap between practices and evidence-based guidelines has been reported in Cambodia, perhaps due to a lack of evidence-based knowledge in maternity care. This study aims to address to what extent skilled birth attendants in the first-line health services in Cambodia have knowledge on the management of normal delivery, and what factors are associated with their level of knowledge. METHODS: Midwives and nurses were recruited working in maternity in first-line public health facilities in Phnom Penh municipality, Kampong Cham and Svay Rieng provinces. Two self-administered questionnaires were applied. The first consisted of three sections with questions on monitoring aspects of the partograph: progress of labour, foetal, and maternal conditions. The second consisted of questions on diagnostic criteria, normal ranges, and standard intervals of monitoring during labour. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify relationships between characteristics of the participants and the questionnaire scores. RESULTS: Of 542 eligible midwives and nurses, 523 (96%) participated. The overall mean score was 58%. Only 3% got scores of more than 90%. Multivariate analysis revealed that 'Kampong Cham province', 'younger age', and 'higher qualification' were significantly associated with higher scores. Previous training experience was not associated with the score. Substantial proportions of misclassification of monitoring items during labour were found; for example, 61% answered uterine contraction as a foetal condition, and 44% answered foetal head descent and 26% answered foetal heart rate as a maternal condition. CONCLUSION: This study found that knowledge was low on delivery management among skilled birth attendants. Previous training experience did not influence the knowledge level. A lack of understanding of physiology and anatomy was implied. Further experimental approaches should be attempted to improve the knowledge and quality of maternity services in Cambodia.

Pregnancy and childbirth are natural phenomena, but sometimes have risk for mothers and babies. Therefore, childbirth should be carefully and continuously monitored by the health care professional. The 'partograph' is a useful tool that defines three monitoring aspects of the delivery progress, and conditions of the mother and intrauterine baby. However, it is often used inaccurately or inappropriately in low- and middle-income countries. We hypothesised that health professionals who assist childbirth cannot effectively monitor delivery conditions because their knowledge is insufficient. Therefore, we evaluated the knowledge on monitoring the process of childbirth and explored factors which affect the level of knowledge among health care providers in Cambodia.Midwives and nurses were targeted in this study who deal with normal deliveries in the capital city and two provinces. The questionnaire was designed to evaluate if their knowledge on three monitoring aspects is accurate.Of 542 eligible personnel, 523 (96%) participated. The mean score was 58%. Only 3% got scores of more than 90%. According to the statistical analysis, 'working in Kampong Cham province', 'younger age', and 'higher qualification' were significantly associated with higher scores. Previous training experience was not associated with the score.This study found that basic knowledge was low on delivery management among health care providers. We suspect that a deficiency of basic medical knowledge, such as physiology and anatomy, causes the lack of knowledge on the childbirth process. Further intervention should be attempted to improve the knowledge and quality of maternity services in Cambodia.

Physicochemical compatibility of propofol-lidocaine mixture.

UNLABELLED: To examine the physicochemical stability of combinations of propofol-lidocaine mixtures frequently used in clinical practice, we added lidocaine 5, 10, 20, or 40 mg to commercially available 1% propofol 20 mL. To assess chemical stability, propofol concentrations were determined by gas chromatography assay for 24 h after preparation of the mixture. In addition, scanning electron microscopy was used to determine the maximum detectable droplet size in randomly selected fields. Macroscopically, separate, colorless layers were first seen at 3 and 24 h after the addition of 40 and 20 mg of lidocaine to propofol, respectively, whereas the mixture with 5 or 10 mg of lidocaine was macroscopically stable. Propofol concentrations in the mixture with 40 mg of lidocaine decreased linearly and significantly from 4 to 24 h after preparation, whereas those combined with other lidocaine doses were unchanged compared with baseline concentrations. Scanning electron microscopy showed that droplets with diameters >or=5 microm first appeared 30 min after the addition of 40 mg of lidocaine to propofol, and the emulsion droplets were enlarged in a time- and dose-dependent fashion. Our results indicate that the addition of lidocaine to propofol results in a coalescence of oil droplets, which finally proceeds to a visible separate layer. Depending on the dose of lidocaine and the duration between its preparation and administration, this combination may pose the risk of pulmonary embolism. IMPLICATIONS: The addition of lidocaine to propofol results in time- and dose-dependent increases in oil droplet diameters in emulsion. This mixture is physicochemically unstable over time and may cause pulmonary embolism, depending on the dose of lidocaine.