High detection rate of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus after treatment with azole antifungal drugs among patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis in a single hospital setting with low azole resistance.

The prevalence of azole-resistant Aspergillus fumigatus (ARAF) among chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA) patients treated with azoles in Japan is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the detection rate of ARAF in isolates from CPA patients who were treated with azoles for varying durations. The potential mechanism of acquiring resistance was examined by sequencing cyp51A and hmg1, two genes associated with ARAF. A. fumigatus isolates (n = 120) were collected from CPA patients (n = 104) between February 2012 and February 2019, at National Hospital Organization Tokyo National Hospital. The isolates were tested for susceptibility to the azole drugs itraconazole (ITCZ) and voriconazole (VRCZ). The detection rate of ARAF among all isolates was 8.3% (n = 10). Of the 10 resistant isolates, eight were ITCZ-resistant and five were VRCZ-resistant. Among 47 isolates obtained from 36 CPA patients who were treated with ITCZ (for an average of 256 days) and/or VRCZ (for an average of 29 days), the resistance rates were 17.0% and 10.6%, respectively. In addition, 46.2% of 13 isolates obtained from CPA patients with ongoing azole treatment at the time of antifungal therapy failure were resistant to azoles. Among the 10 ARAF isolates, a point mutation was detected in cyp51A in seven isolates and in hmg1 in two isolates. ARAF was detected at a high rate in CPA patients, particularly in those with ongoing long-term azole treatment, at the time of azole antifungal therapy failure.

Aspergillus fumigatus can acquire azole resistance during long-term treatment with azole drugs in patients with chronic pulmonary aspergillosis (CPA). The aim of this study was to determine the detection rate of azole-resistant A. fumigatus (ARAF) in isolates from CPA patients who had been treated with azoles. In addition, a potential mechanism of acquiring resistance was examined by sequencing cyp51A and hmg1, two genes associated with ARAF. A. fumigatus isolates (n = 120) were collected from CPA patients (n = 104). The isolates were tested for susceptibility to the azole drugs itraconazole (ITCZ) and voriconazole (VRCZ). The detection rate of ARAF from all isolates was 8.3% (n = 10). Greater than 10% of the 47 isolates obtained from 36 CPA patients who had been treated with azoles exhibited resistance. Furthermore, 46.2% of 13 isolates obtained from CPA patients with ongoing azole treatment at the time of antifungal therapy failure were resistant to azoles. Among the 10 ARAF isolates, a point mutation was detected in cyp51A in seven isolates and in hmg1 in two isolates. ARAF was detected at a high rate in CPA patients undergoing long-term azole treatment at the time of antifungal therapy failure.

Analysis of drug treatment outcome in clarithromycin-resistant Mycobacterium avium complex lung disease.

BACKGROUND: Although the isolation of clarithromycin (CAM)-resistant Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) indicates a poor treatment outcome and increased mortality, there have been only a few reports on drug treatment for CAM-resistant MAC lung disease. We aimed to reveal the effectiveness of the continuation of a macrolide and the use of a multidrug regimen in the treatment of CAM-resistant MAC lung disease. METHODS: Among patients with MAC pulmonary disease as defined by the 2007 criteria of the American Thoracic Society and the Infectious Diseases Society of America statement, those with CAM-resistant MAC (minimum inhibitory concentration ≥32 µg/ml) isolated, newly diagnosed and treated from January 2009 to June 2013 were analysed in this study. Effectiveness was measured based on culture conversion rate and improvement of radiological findings. RESULTS: Thirty-three HIV-negative patients were analysed in this study. Twenty-six were treated with a regimen containing CAM or azithromycin (AZM), and 21 patients were treated with three or more drugs except macrolide. The median duration to be evaluated was 10.4 months after beginning the treatment regimen. Sputum conversion (including cases of inability to expectorate sputum) was achieved in 12 (36%) patients. Radiological effectiveness improved in 4 (12%) patients, was unchanged in 11 (33%) patients and worsened in 18 (55%) patients. In the multivariate analysis, CRP <1.0 mg/dl (p = 0.017, odds ratio 12, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.6-95) was found to be the only significant risk factor for radiological non-deterioration, and no significant risk factors for microbiological improvement were found. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggested that continuation of macrolides or the addition of a new quinolone or injectable aminoglycoside to therapy with rifampicin and ethambutol would not improve clinical outcome after the emergence of CAM-resistant MAC. However, further prospective study is required to evaluate the precise clinical efficacy and effectiveness of these drugs.