Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Sports Med ; 51(6): 511-518, 2017 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27993843

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Shoulder pain in the general population is common and to identify the aetiology of shoulder pain, history, motion and muscle testing, and physical examination tests are usually performed. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to summarise and evaluate intrarater and inter-rater reliability of physical examination tests in the diagnosis of shoulder pathologies. METHODS: A comprehensive systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database (AMED) and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) through 20 March 2015. Methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL) tool by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: The search strategy revealed 3259 articles, of which 18 finally met the inclusion criteria. These studies evaluated the reliability of 62 test and test variations used for the specific physical examination tests for the diagnosis of shoulder pathologies. Methodological quality ranged from 2 to 7 positive criteria of the 11 items of the QAREL tool. CONCLUSIONS: This review identified a lack of high-quality studies evaluating inter-rater as well as intrarater reliability of specific physical examination tests for the diagnosis of shoulder pathologies. In addition, reliability measures differed between included studies hindering proper cross-study comparisons. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42014009018.


Asunto(s)
Examen Físico/métodos , Dolor de Hombro/diagnóstico , Humanos , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Examen Físico/normas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Dolor de Hombro/etiología
2.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 39(8): 586-593, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27637322

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to correlate sitting height measured by stadiometry with lumbar spine height (LSH) modifications measured by musculoskeletal ultrasonography (MSU). METHODS: Eighteen healthy young adults were recruited for this study (mean age: 21.5 ± 1.5 years). All subjects were tested in the following sequence: (1) lying supine for 10 minutes, (2) sitting under loaded (9.5 kg) and unloaded conditions for 5 minutes each, (3) lying supine for 15 minutes with passive lumbar extension, and (4) sitting unloaded for 5 minutes. Both stadiometry and MSU measurements were taken after each step of the testing sequence. RESULTS: Following the loaded sitting step, sitting height (measured by stadiometry) decreased by 3.4 ± 1.6 mm, whereas following sustained lumbar extension, sitting height increased by 5.4 ± 3.5 mm (P < .05). Following loaded sitting and sustained lumbar extension, LSH decreased by 3.8 ± 1.7 mm and increased by 6.2 ± 4.1 mm, respectively (P < .05). On the basis of the mean differences (between the different steps of the testing sequence), the mean correlation coefficient and the mean coefficient of determination between stadiometry and MSU measurements were calculated at 0.93 ± 0.07 and 0.88 ± 0.13, respectively, and no statistical differences were observed (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: In vivo measurements of sitting height changes, measured using stadiometry, were strongly correlated with LSH changes, measured using ultrasonography.


Asunto(s)
Pesos y Medidas Corporales/instrumentación , Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Disco Intervertebral/fisiología , Vértebras Lumbares/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiología , Ultrasonografía , Adulto , Femenino , Voluntarios Sanos , Humanos , Masculino , Postura/fisiología , Adulto Joven
3.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 29(5): 368-73, 2006 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16762664

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To examine the interrater reliability of a passive physiological intervertebral motion (PPIM) test of a mid-thoracic spine motion segment. METHODS: Nineteen males and 22 females with a mean age of 22.7 years (range, 19-40 years) and no known spinal pathologies were tested independently by 3 certified manual therapy instructors. Investigators performed 3-dimensional segmental mobility testing at a preselected thoracic motion segment. Interrater reliability was assessed with Cohen's kappa statistics, using 3 pairwise comparisons for determination of the direction of lateral flexion leading to the greatest amount of segmental rotation. RESULTS: Percent agreement ranges were 63.4% to 82.5%, with kappa scores ranging from 0.27 to 0.65. CONCLUSION: The PPIM testing demonstrated fair to substantial interrater reliability. A majority of females (91%) demonstrated greatest segmental PPIM motion in contralateral rotation with lateral flexion, whereas a majority of males (90%) demonstrated greatest segmental PPIM motion in ipsilateral rotation with lateral flexion. These findings are applicable to asymptomatic subjects of the same age category. Interrater reliability of 3-dimensional PPIM testing is fair to substantial for assessing passive segmental mobility of the mid-thoracic spine.


Asunto(s)
Palpación/métodos , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Vértebras Torácicas/fisiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA