Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Appl Physiol (1985) ; 125(4): 1062-1068, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30024337

RESUMEN

Abdominal functional electrical stimulation (abdominal FES) improves respiratory function. Despite this, clinical use remains low, possibly due to lack of agreement on the optimal electrode position. This study aimed to ascertain the optimal electrode position for abdominal FES, assessed by expiratory twitch pressure. Ten able-bodied participants received abdominal FES using electrodes placed: 1) on the posterolateral abdominal wall and at the motor points of 2) the external oblique muscles plus rectus abdominis muscles, and 3) the external obliques alone. Gastric (Pga) and esophageal (Pes) twitch pressures were measured using a gastroesophageal catheter. Single-stimulation pulses were applied at functional residual capacity during step increments in stimulation current to maximal tolerance or until Pga plateaued. Stimulation applied on the posterolateral abdominal wall led to a 71% and 53% increase in Pga and Pes, respectively, compared with stimulation of the external oblique and rectus abdominis muscles ( P < 0.001) and a 95% and 56% increase in Pga and Pes, respectively, compared with stimulation of the external oblique muscles alone ( P < 0.001). Stimulation of both the external oblique and rectus abdominis muscles led to an 18.3% decrease in Pga compared with stimulation of only the external oblique muscles ( P = 0.040), with inclusion of the rectus abdominis having no effect on Pes ( P = 0.809). Abdominal FES applied on the posterolateral abdominal wall generated the highest expiratory twitch pressures. As expiratory pressure is a good indicator of expiratory muscle strength and, thus, cough efficacy, we recommend this electrode position for all therapeutic applications of abdominal FES. NEW & NOTEWORTHY While abdominal functional electrical stimulation (abdominal FES) can improve respiratory function, clinical use remains low. This is at least partly due to lack of agreement on the optimal electrode position. Therefore, this study aimed to ascertain the optimal electrode position for abdominal FES. We show that electrodes placed on the posterolateral abdominal wall generated the highest expiratory twitch pressures. As such, we recommend this electrode position for all therapeutic applications of abdominal FES.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Abdominales/fisiología , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Espiración , Adulto , Electrodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven
2.
J Spinal Cord Med ; 39(6): 720-725, 2016 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26689243

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: Respiratory complications, attributed to the build-up of secretions in the airway, are a leading cause of rehospitalisation for the tetraplegic population. Previously, we observed that the application of Abdominal Functional Electrical Stimulation (AFES) improved cough function and increased demand for secretion removal, suggesting AFES may aid secretion clearance. Clinically, secretion clearance is commonly achieved by using Mechanical insufflation-exsufflation (MI-E) to simulate a cough. In this study the feasibility of combining AFES with MI-E is evaluated. FINDINGS: AFES was successfully combined with MI-E at eight fortnightly assessment sessions conducted with one sub-acute participant with tetraplegia. By using the signal from a pressure sensor, integrated with the MI-E device, AFES was correctly applied in synchrony with MI-E with an accuracy of 96.7%. Acute increases in exhaled volume and peak flow were observed during AFES assisted MI-E, compared to MI-E alone, at six of eight assessment sessions. CONCLUSION: The successful integration of AFES with MI-E at eight assessment sessions demonstrates the feasibility of this technique. The acute increases in respiratory function observed at the majority of assessment sessions generate the hypothesis that AFES assisted MI-E may be more effective for secretion clearance than MI-E alone.


Asunto(s)
Músculos Abdominales/inervación , Tos/terapia , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/métodos , Insuflación/métodos , Cuadriplejía/terapia , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/terapia , Músculos Abdominales/fisiología , Anciano , Tos/etiología , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/efectos adversos , Humanos , Insuflación/efectos adversos , Masculino , Cuadriplejía/complicaciones , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA