RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We investigated the contribution of swab washing to the efficiency of red cell recovery by intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) in 10 patients undergoing elective aortic aneurysm repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Volumes and haemoglobin (Hb) concentrations were recorded in the blood recovered by direct suction and from washed swabs, both before and after processing with a Haemonetics Cell Saver 5. RESULTS: The mean +/- standard deviation (SD) estimated blood loss was 991 +/- 403 ml, resulting in a mean +/- SD salvaged RBC volume of 380 +/- 124 ml. The median [interquartile (IQR) range] Hb collected from suction was 84.9 (61.8-131.4) g, of which 50.1 (45-71.5) g was returned to the patient after processing, a median yield of 68 (49-77)%. The swab wash produced a median (IQR) Hb of 39.4 (28.4-64.9) g, of which 26.2 (16.8-31) g was reinfused, a 67 (33-98)% yield. Swab wash thus contributed with a median (IQR) of 31 (24-39)% of the total RBC recovery. CONCLUSIONS: Washing swabs improves the efficiency of red cell recovery by ICS.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga/métodos , Eritrocitos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Hemoglobinas/análisis , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: we investigated whether carotid sinus nerve infiltration with lignocaine reduced blood pressure lability during the first 24h following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). DESIGN: prospective randomised double-blind controlled trial. MATERIALS: eighty patients undergoing CEA for significant symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery. METHODS: after initial dissection, 5 ml of 1% lignocaine or normal saline placebo according to randomisation was infiltrated around the carotid sinus nerve. Blood pressure was measured by intra-arterial cannula during surgery and for four hours afterwards every 15 min, then manually, hourly for 18 h. RESULTS: patients having excision of the carotid sinus nerve were grouped separately for analysis: 29 patients had lignocaine, 33 placebo and 17 excision (one early death with incomplete data was excluded). Mean systolic, diastolic and pulse pressures did not differ significantly between the three groups before carotid sinus nerve infiltration. After infiltration, those patients who had carotid sinus nerve excision, had significantly higher systolic [mean (SD)=155 (16)mmHg] and diastolic [75 (9)mmHg] pressures than those receiving LA [systolic=136 (15)mmHg, diastolic=65 (10)mmHg] or placebo [systolic=136 (19)mmHg, diastolic=65 (9)mmHg], (p<0.005 ANOVA). Nerve excision also resulted in wider variability of blood pressure as defined by the mean of individual standard deviations (systolic=25 mmHg, diastolic=13 mmHg) compared to LA (systolic=19 mmHg, diastolic=12 mmHg) or placebo (systolic=18 mmHg, diastolic=10 mmHg) (p<0.05 ANOVA). Normotensive patients had significantly lower mean diastolic pressures (p<0.001 ANOVA) and variability (p<0.05) if they received lignocaine although this did not influence pulse pressure. CONCLUSIONS: lignocaine injection of the carotid sinus nerve has no benefit in those patients with existing treated hypertension and only marginal effects in normotensives. It is more important to preserve the carotid sinus nerve if possible.
Asunto(s)
Anestesia Local , Anestésicos Locales/farmacología , Presión Sanguínea/efectos de los fármacos , Arteria Carótida Interna/inervación , Arteria Carótida Interna/cirugía , Seno Carotídeo/efectos de los fármacos , Seno Carotídeo/inervación , Estenosis Carotídea/cirugía , Endarterectomía Carotidea , Lidocaína/farmacología , Bloqueo Nervioso , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteria Carótida Interna/efectos de los fármacos , Seno Carotídeo/cirugía , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the costs of acute normovolaemic haemodilution (ANH) and intraoperative cell salvage (ICS) versus homologous blood transfusion in aortic surgery in a prospective multicentre randomized trial. METHODS: One hundred and forty-five patients were randomized either to standard transfusion practice (homologous) or to a combination of ANH and ICS (autologous). Costs for each inpatient admission were identified. Cell salvage costs were assigned on the assumption that 50 operations were done each year employing a trained cell salvage operator. The results were analysed statistically using bias-corrected bootstrap analysis. RESULTS: Patients who had transfusion of homologous blood received some 251 units and those having a homologous transfusion received 103 units (P = 0.008). There was no difference in morbidity, mortality and duration of hospital stay. Transfusion-related mean costs were similar at 340 UK pounds for patients having a homologous transfusion and 357 UK pounds for those receiving autologous blood (mean difference 17 UK pounds (95 per cent confidence interval [c.i.]--184 UK pounds to 174 UK pounds); P not significant). There was also no significant difference in mean overall costs: 5859 UK pounds for homologous and 5384 UK pounds for autologous transfusion (mean difference--475 UK pounds (95 per cent c.i.--2231 UK pounds to 1342 UK pounds)). Sensitivity analysis showed that costs remained similar for 20 and 150 operations per annum. Exclusion of a dedicated cell salvage operator reduced autologous transfusion costs but did not have a significant impact on overall cost. CONCLUSION: Autologous transfusion is cost neutral in aortic surgery even when surgical activity is low.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta/cirugía , Hemodilución/economía , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/economía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Transfusión de Sangre Autóloga , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Hemodilución/métodos , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Terapia Recuperativa/economía , Terapia Recuperativa/métodos , Sensibilidad y EspecificidadRESUMEN
Our aim was to assess changes in attitudes to autologous transfusion amongst surgeons over a 10-year period in response to scientific evidence, public awareness, published guidelines, management and the increasing cost of blood products. Surgeons across the north-west of England completed questionnaires on knowledge, experience and attitude towards autologous transfusion in 1990, 1994 and 1999. Main outcome measures were changes in knowledge, experience and utilization of autologous transfusion; perceived advantages of autologous transfusion, obstacles to its implementation in surgical practice and preferences for specific techniques (preoperative autologous donation, acute normovolaemic haemodilution, intraoperative and postoperative cell salvage). There has been little change in practice over 10 years. Many more surgeons were keen to employ autologous transfusion than were using it. Autologous transfusion was only used in general, orthopaedic and cardiothoracic surgery. Safety and patient preference were the main arguments for implementation and logistics the main obstacles. Autologous transfusion was used sporadically in surgical practice. Clinical trials are needed to guide clinicians in the choice of transfusion techniques.