Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Diabetes Care ; 41(6): 1312-1320, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29784698

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The implementation of the Chronic Care Model (CCM) improves health care quality. We examined the sustained effectiveness of multicomponent integrated care in type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched PubMed and Ovid MEDLINE (January 2000-August 2016) and identified randomized controlled trials comprising two or more quality improvement strategies from two or more domains (health system, health care providers, or patients) lasting ≥12 months with one or more clinical outcomes. Two reviewers extracted data and appraised the reporting quality. RESULTS: In a meta-analysis of 181 trials (N = 135,112), random-effects modeling revealed pooled mean differences in HbA1c of -0.28% (95% CI -0.35 to -0.21) (-3.1 mmol/mol [-3.9 to -2.3]), in systolic blood pressure (SBP) of -2.3 mmHg (-3.1 to -1.4), in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of -1.1 mmHg (-1.5 to -0.6), and in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) of -0.14 mmol/L (-0.21 to -0.07), with greater effects in patients with LDL-C ≥3.4 mmol/L (-0.31 vs. -0.10 mmol/L for <3.4 mmol/L; Pdifference = 0.013), studies from Asia (HbA1c -0.51% vs. -0.23% for North America [-5.5 vs. -2.5 mmol/mol]; Pdifference = 0.046), and studies lasting >12 months (SBP -3.4 vs. -1.4 mmHg, Pdifference = 0.034; DBP -1.7 vs. -0.7 mmHg, Pdifference = 0.047; LDL-C -0.21 vs. -0.07 mmol/L for 12-month studies, Pdifference = 0.049). Patients with median age <60 years had greater HbA1c reduction (-0.35% vs. -0.18% for ≥60 years [-3.8 vs. -2.0 mmol/mol]; Pdifference = 0.029). Team change, patient education/self-management, and improved patient-provider communication had the largest effect sizes (0.28-0.36% [3.0-3.9 mmol/mol]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small effect size of multicomponent integrated care (in part attenuated by good background care), team-based care with better information flow may improve patient-provider communication and self-management in patients who are young, with suboptimal control, and in low-resource settings.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Adulto , Enfermedad Crónica/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relaciones Médico-Paciente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Automanejo
2.
Prim Care Diabetes ; 1(1): 49-55, 2007 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18632019

RESUMEN

Up to two-thirds of people with type-2 diabetes do not achieve glycaemic targets, increasing their risk of serious complications. New global recommendations from The Global Partnership for Effective Diabetes Management offer practical, simple advice for the diabetes management team to help individuals reach glycaemic goals. The recommendations focus on four areas: achieving optimal glycaemic control, targeting the underlying pathophysiology of the disease, treating earlier and intensively with combination therapy, and adopting a holistic approach. This article reviews the new recommendations and suggests that they offer a route to achieving guideline-based targets and improving outcomes in the real-life healthcare setting.


Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperglucemia/prevención & control , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Complicaciones de la Diabetes/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatología , Quimioterapia Combinada , Directrices para la Planificación en Salud , Salud Holística , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/tendencias , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA