Spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of cancer-related pain: "back to the origins".

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used in the treatment of chronic pain for more than 40 years. The most common indication for SCS in the USA is failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Interestingly, the first two spinal cord stimulators ever implanted were in patients suffering from bronchogenic carcinoma and pelvic cancer, respectively. While cancer accounts for millions of deaths each year in the USA, pain is often the first sign of malignancy. An increasing number of people suffer from cancer-related pain each year and many receive suboptimal relief. Given the demonstrated value of spinal cord stimulation in the treatment of neuropathic pain, spinal cord stimulation should be considered "earlier" as an adjunct to the treatment of cancer-related pain. In addition, with the improving survival rates associated with advances in cancer treatment, spinal cord stimulation may help reduce the risk of development of chronic neuropathic pain in survivors.

Updated perspectives on occipital nerve stimulator lead migration: case report and literature review.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with occipital neuralgia are often refractory to or intolerant of standard pharmacological and interventional management strategies. Although occipital nerve stimulation (ONS) may provide a unique alternative for such cases, a steep technical learning curve still exists. Lead migration (LM) is among the most challenging issues facing implanters performing ONS implantation. We present an unusual case of LM after ONS implantation and discuss technical aspects for successful revision. METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records and fluoroscopic images was conducted to provide a case report of ONS LM and revision. A PubMed online search for the keywords occipital, stimulation, migration, and revision was also performed for literature review. CASE REPORT: A 35-year-old man with refractory occipital neuralgia had loss of greater occipital nerve paresthesia coverage and worsened occipital headaches 11 months after ONS implantation using a midline approach. Fluoroscopic imaging confirmed lateral LM. Although most LMs occur in the lateral-to-medial trajectory, this case was unique in that LM occurred from a medial-to-lateral trajectory despite using current standard safeguards. DISCUSSION: In an era in which reducing health care expenditures is becoming increasingly important, current complication rates could curtail future acceptance and utilization of ONS. This fact and our case report underscore the importance of a continued drive toward technical advances and a reduction in complications associated with this important treatment modality. Further prospective investigation into the mechanism of action, mechanism of complications, optimization of surgical techniques, and long-term efficacy is warranted.

Cephalad lead migration following spinal cord stimulation implantation.

Lead migration (LM) is the most common complication after spinal cord stimulation (SCS). Although multiple reports of caudad LM have been described, cephalad LM has not been reported. Here we describe a case in which a stimulator lead migrates in the cephalad direction. A 60-year-old male with failed back surgery syndrome underwent SCS lead implantation via a dual lead approach to the top of vertebral body (VB) T9. A standard strain relief loop was used for each lead in the paramedian pocket. Postoperative testing revealed 100% paresthesia coverage of the painful areas. For the first 4 days, the patient continued to have excellent coverage; however, by the seventh day, the paresthesias ascended to above the nipple line. At the 2-week follow-up, cephalad migration of the left lead to the top of VB T1 was confirmed on fluoroscopy. The patient underwent successful lead revision in which a single paramedian incision technique was used to place extra sutures and a "figure-of-eight" strain relief loop. We provide the first case report of significant cephalad LM following SCS lead implantation. This migration can occur despite the use of current standard anchoring techniques. Additional investigation into the mechanism of such LM and lead-securing techniques is warranted.

Contemporary insights into painful diabetic neuropathy and treatment with spinal cord stimulation.

A substantial body of literature is available on the natural history of diabetes, but much less is understood of the natural history of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (PDPN), a pervasive and costly complication of diabetes mellitus. Multiple mechanisms have been proposed, including polyol pathway activation, advanced glycosylation end-product formation, and vasculopathic changes. Nevertheless, specific treatment modalities addressing these basic issues are still lacking. The mainstay of treatment includes pharmacological management with antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and opioids, but these drugs are often limited by unfavorable side-effect profiles. For over 30 years, spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been used extensively for the management of various chronic neuropathic pain states. In the past decade, interest in the use of SCS for treatment of PDPN has increased. This article reviews pathophysiological mechanisms of PDPN, proposed mechanisms of SCS, and the role of SCS for the treatment of PDPN.