Benchmarking the Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model: Changes in Medicare Reimbursement for 16 Common Radiation Therapy Treatment Courses.

Radiation oncology (RO) has seen declines in Medicare reimbursement (MCR) in the past decade under the current fee-for-service model. Although studies have explored decline in reimbursement at a per-code level, to our knowledge there are no recent studies analyzing changes in MCR over time for common RO treatment courses. By analyzing changes in MCR for common treatment courses, our study had 3 objectives: (1) to provide practitioners and policymakers with estimates of recent reimbursement changes for common treatment courses; (2) to provide an estimate of how reimbursement will change in the future under the current fee-for-service model if current trends continue; and (3) to provide a baseline for treatment episodes in the event that the episode-based Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model is eventually implemented. Specifically, we quantified inflation- and utilization-adjusted changes in reimbursement for 16 common radiation therapy (RT) treatment courses from 2010 to 2020. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary databases were used to obtain reimbursement for all RO procedures in 2010, 2015, and 2020 for free-standing facilities. Inflation-adjusted average reimbursement (AR) per billing instance was calculated for each Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System code using 2020 dollars. For each year, the billing frequency of each code was multiplied by the AR per code. Results were summed per RT course per year, and AR for RT courses were compared. Sixteen common RO courses for head and neck, breast, prostate, lung, and palliative RT were analyzed. AR decreased for all 16 courses from 2010 to 2020. From 2015 to 2020, the only course that increased in AR was palliative 2-dimensional 10-fraction 30 Gy, which increased by 0.4%. Courses using intensity modulated RT saw the largest AR decline from 2010 to 2020, ranging from 38% to 39%. We report significant declines in reimbursement from 2010 to 2020 for common RO courses, with the largest declines for intensity modulated RT. Policymakers should consider the significant cuts to reimbursement that have already occurred when considering future reimbursement adjustment under the current fee-for-service model or when considering mandatory adoption of a new payment system with further cuts and the negative effect of such cuts on quality and access to care.

Novel Radiation Approaches.

The standard of care treatment for glioblastoma is surgical resection followed by radiotherapy to 60 Gy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide with or without tumor-treating fields. Advanced imaging techniques are under evaluation to better guide radiotherapy target volume delineation and allow for dose escalation. Particle therapy, in the form of protons, carbon ions, and boron neutron capture therapy, are being assessed as strategies to improve the radiotherapeutic ratio. Stereotactic, hypofractionated, pulsed-reduced dose-rate, and particle radiotherapy are re-irradiation techniques each uniquely suited for different clinical scenarios. Novel radiotherapy approaches, such as FLASH, represent promising advancements in radiotherapy for glioblastoma.

Case report of visual biofeedback-driven, magnetic resonance-guided single-fraction SABR in breath hold for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Stereotactic ablative body radiation therapy (SABR) is a well-established alternative to surgery for early stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While SABR is typically delivered in 3 to 5 fractions, randomized trials have shown single-fraction SABR to be a reasonable alternative. We present the case of a 66-year-old male with history of cholangiocarcinoma who was subsequently diagnosed with peripheral early stage NSCLC and treated in mid-inspiration breath hold (BH) to 34 Gy in 1 fraction on a magnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerator, with treatment delivery completed in 17 minutes. Visual biofeedback was utilized to maximize patient compliance with appropriate depth of inspiration BH and improve overall treatment delivery time efficiency. The benefits of single- vs multifraction SABR and unique advantages of MR guidance that are particularly well-suited for single-fraction SABR are reviewed.

Phase I study of sorafenib and tipifarnib for recurrent glioblastoma: NABTC 05-02.

Recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) has a very low 6-month progression free survival (PFS) with currently available treatments. Combination chemotherapy to target multiple cell signaling pathways is currently being investigated in order to improve prognosis for recurrent disease. The purpose of this phase I study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) for the combination of tipifarnib and sorafenib for the treatment of recurrent GBM. Patients with pathologically proven WHO grade IV GBM and radiographically proven tumor recurrence were eligible for this study. Treatments included sorafenib at twice daily and escalating dosages of tipifarnib. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was determined over the first 28-days of treatments, and the MTD was determined in a 3 + 3 study design. We enrolled 24 patients, and 21 patients completed the MTD period. The study was stopped early with no MTD determination for excessive toxicities. The last dose level reached was sorafenib at 200 mg twice a day and tipifarnib 100 mg twice a day on an alternating week schedule. The DLTs included diarrhea, lipase elevation, hypophosphatemia, and arthralgia. The combination of sorafenib and tipifarnib has excessive toxicities and full single agent dosages could not be achieved in combination.

International Medical Graduates in Radiation Oncology: Historical Trends and Comparison With Other Medical Specialties.

PURPOSE: This is the first National Resident Matching Program analysis evaluating historical patterns of international medical graduates (IMGs) in radiation oncology (RO) and providing comparison with American (MD) medical graduates (AMGs), osteopathic students (DOs), unfilled positions, and other specialties. METHODS AND MATERIALS: National Resident Matching Program data for IMGs were available from 2003 to 2015, with limited data for other specialty matches. The following RO-specific figures were obtained per year: total positions available; total matched positions; number of unfilled positions; and number of IMG, AMG, and DO matches. In addition, the number of IMG matches and total matched positions were obtained for 19 other specialties. Fisher exact tests and χ(2) tests were considered significant at α <.05. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2015, 0.8% of RO matches were IMGs, a decline from 2.4% in 2003 to 2009 (P=.006). Proportions of DO matches during these intervals increased by 40% (from 1.0% to 1.4%), significantly lower than IMGs for 2003 to 2009 (P=.03) but not 2010 to 2015 (P=.26). From 2003 to 2015, the percentage of IMG matches, at 1.5%, was significantly lower than the percentage of unfilled seats, at 3.5% (P<.001). In comparison with other specialties (2003-2015), RO had the fewest IMG matches (1.5%), followed by otolaryngology (1.9%) and orthopedics (2.2%); specialties with the highest IMG proportions were internal medicine (37.1%), family medicine (35.7%), and neurology (31.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Presently, IMGs represent <1% of RO matches, the lowest among major specialties. There are several speculative factors associated with this low proportion. There are significantly more unfilled positions than those filled by IMGs; programs at risk of not matching could weigh the advantages and disadvantages of interviewing IMGs.

A roundtable discussion on the clinical challenges and options for the treatment of glioblastoma: introducing a novel modality, TTFields.

Since its approval in 2011 for patients with recurrent glioblastoma (GBM), physicians have responded positively to the non-invasive nature of the NovoTTF-100A System device (NovoCure Ltd, Haifa, Israel), citing significantly less toxicity and a better quality of life profile compared to available conventional therapies. A roundtable discussion (available at: http://education.seminoncol.org/path.php?1399:0:Media:title:bxvcs) was recently convened to provide a knowledge-based perspective surrounding current treatment options for patients with GBM and the clinical challenges involved with the treatment of recurrent GBM patients who have failed prior therapies. The participating roundtable experts discussed the challenges encountered in managing GBM patients, the current approved treatment options for these patients, the efficacy and safety profile of NovoTTF therapy (TTFields), and its use as a novel treatment modality for recurrent GBM patients.

Improvement, clinical course, and quality of life after palliative radiotherapy for recurrent glioblastoma.

The purpose of this review is to assess the palliative effect of re-irradiation in adult patients with recurrent supratentorial glioblastoma (GBM) previously treated with adjuvant or primary radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy. From a comprehensive literature search, studies were identified reporting on survival, progression, and quality of life endpoints including, but not limited to, EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire, clinical symptoms, and ability to reduce dexamethasone. Data from more than 300 GBM patients (grade 3 anaplastic gliomas were excluded) demonstrate that re-irradiation yields 6-month PFS of 28% to 39% and 1-year overall survival of 18% to 48%, without additional chemotherapy (median value 26%). Patients with Karnofsky performance status <70 appeared to be at higher risk of early progression and apparently had lesser benefit from re-irradiation. Clinical improvement was observed in 24% to 45% of the patients. Most studies suggest that stabilization of the performance status is a realistic aim. In the studies reporting on corticosteroid usage during and after re-irradiation, 20% to 60% of the patients achieved a reduction in steroid dependency. Serious late toxicity was uncommon, especially after conventional treatment and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). In light of recent technological advances such as FSRT and intensity modulated radiotherapy, which permit maximal sparing of normal brain, re-treatment seems attractive, and deserves scientific validation. Even fraction sizes of 3 to 5 Gy seem to be well tolerated in limited-volume recurrences as long as the total dose is limited to 30 to 35 Gy. Salvage chemotherapy or targeted agents should be prospectively tested against re-irradiation alone.