A randomized crossover study of functional electrical stimulation during walking in spastic cerebral palsy: the FES on participation (FESPa) trial.

BACKGROUND: Spastic cerebral palsy is the most common cause of motor disability in children. It often leads to foot drop or equinus, interfering with walking. Ankle-foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly used in these cases. However, AFOs can be too restrictive for mildly impaired patients. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the ankle-dorsiflexors is an alternative treatment as it could function as a dynamic functional orthosis. Despite previous research, high level evidence on the effects of FES on activities and participation in daily life is missing. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate whether FES improves the activity and participation level in daily life according to patients, and the secondary aim is to provide evidence of the effect of FES at the level of body functions and activities. Furthermore, we aim to collect relevant information for decisions on its clinical implementation. METHODS: A randomized crossover trial will be performed on 25 children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy. Patients aged between 4 and 18 years, with Gross Motor Functioning Classification System level I or II and unilateral foot drop of central origin, currently treated with AFO or adapted shoes, will be included. All participants will undergo twelve weeks of conventional treatment (AFO/adapted shoes) and 12 weeks of FES treatment, separated by a six-week washout-phase. FES treatment consists of wearing the WalkAide® device, with surface electrodes stimulating the peroneal nerve during swing phase of gait. For the primary objective, the Goal Attainment Scale is used to test whether FES improves activities and participation in daily life. The secondary objective is to prove whether FES is effective at the level of body functions and structures, and activities, including ankle kinematics and kinetics measured during 3D-gait analysis and questionnaire-based frequency of falling. The tertiary objective is to collect relevant information for clinical implementation, including acceptability using the device log file and side effect registration, cost-effectiveness based on quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and clinical characteristics for patient selection. DISCUSSION: We anticipate that the results of this study will allow evidence-based use of FES during walking in children with unilateral spastic cerebral palsy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov : NCT03440632 .

Oxygen uptake, ventilation, and symptoms during low-frequency versus high-frequency NMES in COPD: a pilot study.

Transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) involves the application of an electrical current through electrodes placed on the skin over the targeted muscles. During high-frequency NMES (HF-NMES), oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, and the degree of symptom perception (dyspnea and fatigue) have been shown to be acceptable in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Currently, oxygen uptake and ventilation load have never been assessed during low-frequency NMES (LF-NMES) of the lower-limb muscles. The purpose of this study was to compare prospectively oxygen uptake, ventilation, and symptom perception during a single session of LF-NMES versus a single session of HF-NMES of quadriceps muscles in patients with COPD. In 17 COPD patients (mean FEV(1) = 45% predicted, mean body mass index = 26.2 kg/m(2)), peak exercise capacity, functional exercise capacity, and the Medical Research Council dyspnea grade were evaluated. In addition, oxygen uptake, minute ventilation, heart rate, and Borg symptom scores were assessed during one session of LF-NMES (15 Hz) and one session of HF-NMES (75 Hz) and compared with peak values. Mean oxygen uptake (LF-NMES: 327 ml/min vs. HF-NMES: 315 ml/min), minute ventilation (LF-NMES: 14 L vs. HF-NMES: 15 L), and heart rate (LF-NMES: 86 BPM vs. HF-NMES: 83 BPM) were similar during both NMES frequencies. Patients used a relatively low proportion of their peak aerobic capacity during both NMES sessions (LF-NMES: 34% vs. HF-NMES: 33%; P = 0.397). In addition, symptom Borg scores for dyspnea and leg fatigue were also comparable. Oxygen uptake, ventilation, and symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue were comparable and tolerable during LF-NMES and HF-NMES in patients with COPD. Therefore, LF-NMES and HF-NMES may both be suitable rehabilitative modalities to be used in severely dyspneic patients with lower-limb muscle dysfunction.

Protein supplementation before and after exercise does not further augment skeletal muscle hypertrophy after resistance training in elderly men.

BACKGROUND: Considerable discrepancy exists in the literature on the proposed benefits of protein supplementation on the adaptive response of skeletal muscle to resistance-type exercise training in the elderly. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to assess the benefits of timed protein supplementation on the increase in muscle mass and strength during prolonged resistance-type exercise training in healthy elderly men who habitually consume adequate amounts of dietary protein. DESIGN: Healthy elderly men (n = 26) aged 72 +/- 2 y were randomly assigned to a progressive, 12-wk resistance-type exercise training program with (protein group) or without (placebo group) protein provided before and immediately after each exercise session (3 sessions/wk, 20 g protein/session). One-repetition maximum (1RM) tests were performed regularly to ensure a progressive workload during the intervention. Muscle hypertrophy was assessed at the whole-body (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry), limb (computed tomography), and muscle fiber (biopsy) level. RESULTS: The 1RM strength increased approximately 25-35% in both groups (P < 0.001). Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and computed tomography scans showed similar increases in leg muscle mass (6 +/- 1% in both groups; P < 0.001) and in the quadriceps (9 +/- 1% in both groups), from 75.9 +/- 3.7 and 73.8 +/- 3.2 to 82.4 +/- 3.9 and 80.0 +/- 3.0 cm2 in the placebo and protein groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Muscle fiber hypertrophy was greater in type II (placebo: 28 +/- 6%; protein: 29 +/- 4%) than in type I (placebo: 5 +/- 4%; protein: 13 +/- 6%) fibers, but the difference between groups was not significant. CONCLUSION: Timed protein supplementation immediately before and after exercise does not further augment the increase in skeletal muscle mass and strength after prolonged resistance-type exercise training in healthy elderly men who habitually consume adequate amounts of dietary protein. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00744094.