Individualized current-shaping reduces DBS-induced dysarthria in patients with essential tremor.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate in patients with essential tremor (ET) treated with thalamic/subthalamic deep brain stimulation (DBS) whether stimulation-induced dysarthria (SID) can be diminished by individualized current-shaping with interleaving stimulation (cs-ILS) while maintaining tremor suppression (TS). METHODS: Of 26 patients screened, 10 reported SID and were invited for testing. TS was assessed by the Tremor Rating Scale and kinematic analysis of postural and action tremor. SID was assessed by phonetic and logopedic means. Additionally, patients rated their dysarthria on a visual analog scale. RESULTS: In 6 of the 10 patients with ET, DBS-ON (relative to DBS-OFF) led to SID while tremor was successfully reduced. When comparing individualized cs-ILS with a non-current-shaped interleaving stimulation (ILS) in these patients, there was no difference in TS while 4 of the 6 patients showed subjective improvement of speech during cs-ILS. Phonetic analysis (ILS vs cs-ILS) revealed that during cs-ILS there was a reduction of voicing during the production of voiceless stop consonants and also a trend toward an improvement in oral diadochokinetic rate, reflecting less dysarthria. Logopedic rating showed a trend toward deterioration in the diadochokinesis task when comparing ON with OFF but no difference between ILS and cs-ILS. CONCLUSION: This is a proof-of-principle evaluation of current-shaping in patients with ET treated with thalamic/subthalamic DBS and experiencing SID. Data suggest a benefit on SID from individual shaping of current spread while TS is preserved. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class IV evidence that in patients with ET treated with DBS with SID, individualized cs-ILS reduces dysarthria while maintaining tremor control.

Processing of auditory motion in inferior parietal lobule: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation.

The neural substrates of auditory motion processing are, at present, still a matter of debate. It has been hypothesized that motion information is, as in the visual system, processed separately from other aspects of auditory information, such as stationary location. Here we aimed to differentiate the location of auditory motion processing in human cortex using low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in combination with a psychophysical task of motion discrimination. rTMS was applied offline to right posterior superior temporal gyrus, right inferior parietal lobule, right dorsal premotor cortex, or right primary somatosensory cortex (as reference site). A significant decrease in performance was obtained exclusively for sounds presented in left hemispace after rTMS over the right inferior parietal lobule (BA 40). This finding indicates that the inferior parietal lobule plays a crucial role in the analysis of moving sound, with an apparent contralaterality of cortical processing. Combined with previous studies which have demonstrated effects of rTMS on static sound localization for both inferior parietal and posterior temporal cortices, the results suggest a hierarchical processing of auditory spatial information, with higher-order functions of motion analysis, such as discrimination of motion direction, mainly taking place beyond the temporal lobe.

Involvement of the superior temporal cortex and the occipital cortex in spatial hearing: evidence from repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation.

The processing of auditory spatial information in cortical areas of the human brain outside of the primary auditory cortex remains poorly understood. Here we investigated the role of the superior temporal gyrus (STG) and the occipital cortex (OC) in spatial hearing using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). The right STG is known to be of crucial importance for visual spatial awareness, and has been suggested to be involved in auditory spatial perception. We found that rTMS of the right STG induced a systematic error in the perception of interaural time differences (a primary cue for sound localization in the azimuthal plane). This is in accordance with the recent view, based on both neurophysiological data obtained in monkeys and human neuroimaging studies, that information on sound location is processed within a dorsolateral "where" stream including the caudal STG. A similar, but opposite, auditory shift was obtained after rTMS of secondary visual areas of the right OC. Processing of auditory information in the OC has previously been shown to exist only in blind persons. Thus, the latter finding provides the first evidence of an involvement of the visual cortex in spatial hearing in sighted human subjects, and suggests a close interconnection of the neural representation of auditory and visual space. Because rTMS induced systematic shifts in auditory lateralization, but not a general deterioration, we propose that rTMS of STG or OC specifically affected neuronal circuits transforming auditory spatial coordinates in order to maintain alignment with vision.

Clinical hypnosis modulates functional magnetic resonance imaging signal intensities and pain perception in a thermal stimulation paradigm.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to describe regional changes in blood oxygenation level dependent signals in functional magnetic resonance images (fMRI) elicited by thermal pain in hypnotized subjects. These signals approximately identify the neural correlates of the applied stimulation to identify neuroanatomic structures involved in the putative effects of clinical hypnosis on pain perception. METHODS: After determination of the heat pain threshold of 12 healthy volunteers, fMRI scans were performed at 1.5 Tesla by using echoplanar imaging technique during repeated painful heat stimuli. Activation of brain regions in response to thermal pain during hypnosis (using a fixation and command technique of hypnosis) was compared with responses without hypnosis. RESULTS: With hypnosis, less activation in the primary sensory cortex, the middle cingulate gyrus, precuneus, and the visual cortex was found. An increased activation was seen in the anterior basal ganglia and the left anterior cingulate cortex. There was no difference in activation within the right anterior cingulate gyrus in our fMRI studies. No activation was seen within the brainstem and thalamus under either condition. CONCLUSION: Our observations indicate that clinical hypnosis may prevent nociceptive inputs from reaching the higher cortical structures responsible for pain perception. Whether the effects of hypnosis can be explained by increased activation of the left anterior cingulate cortex and the basal ganglia as part of a possible inhibitory pathway on pain perception remains speculative given the limitations of our study design.