Microwave ablation in primary and secondary liver tumours: technical and clinical approaches.

Thermal ablation is increasingly being utilised in the treatment of primary and metastatic liver tumours, both as curative therapy and as a bridge to transplantation. Recent advances in high-powered microwave ablation systems have allowed physicians to realise the theoretical heating advantages of microwave energy compared to other ablation modalities. As a result there is a growing body of literature detailing the effects of microwave energy on tissue heating, as well as its effect on clinical outcomes. This article will discuss the relevant physics, review current clinical outcomes and then describe the current techniques used to optimise patient care when using microwave ablation systems.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound: Should it play a role in immediate evaluation of liver tumors following thermal ablation?

PURPOSE: To compare the accuracy of immediate CEUS with results of 24-h CEUS and MDCT in early evaluation of liver tumors following thermal ablation, using the combined results of a 3 month follow-up MDCT and CEUS as a reference standard. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: From our database, we selected patients who underwent a thermal ablation immediately followed by CEUS (within 5-10min) between February 2009 and February 2011. There were 92 patients (median age 73 years), two of whom had repeat ablation during the study period for a total of 94 tumors. Sixty tumors were treated with radiofrequency and 34 with microwave ablation. All patients underwent CEUS and CT examinations at 24h. For patients with more than one treated tumor in the same session, the lesion imaged post-procedural and at 24-h with CEUS in all vascular phases was selected. All measurements of the necrotic zone, as an avascular zone, were performed during the portal-venous phase. Immediate post-procedural CEUS and 24h CEUS and MDCT were blindly reviewed by two radiologists. One radiologist blindly reviewed the follow-up imaging. The mean diameters of the necrotic zone at post-procedural CEUS, and CEUS and MDCT at 24h were compared and diagnostic accuracy to detect residual tumor calculated for each index tests compared to 3-months follow-up imaging. RESULTS: The mean diameter of the necrotic zone was: 29±9mm at post-procedural CEUS, 34±10mm at 24h CEUS and 35±11mm at 24h MDCT. Mean diameter of the necrotic zone was significantly smaller at post-procedural CEUS compared to either CEUS or MDCT at 24h (p<0.001 for all). With a 95% confidence interval, the sensitivity was 25% (11-47%) for immediate CEUS, 20% (8-42%) for CEUS at 24-h, and 40% (22-61%) for CT at 24-h. Specificity was 96% (89-99%) for immediate CEUS, 97% (91-99%) for CEUS at 24-h, and 97% (91-99%) for CT at 24-h. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic accuracy of post-procedural CEUS in early evaluation of liver tumors following thermal ablation is comparable to both CEUS and MDCT performed at 24h. Therefore, post-procedural CEUS can be used to detect and retreat residual viable tissue in the same ablation session.