Hyperthermic pelvic perfusion with tumor necrosis factor-α for locally advanced cancers: encouraging results of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy of isolated pelvic perfusion (IPP) with tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α and melphalan in patients with locally advanced cancers in the pelvic and groin area requiring mutilating surgery. METHODS: A total of 27 patients were enrolled (carcinoma, n = 17; sarcoma/melanoma, n = 4; and endocrine tumor, n = 6). They were candidates for exarticulation (n = 3) or exenteration (n = 11) or were judged unresectable (n = 13). In installing IPP, tourniquets were positioned around both thighs, and an inflated pressure suit was placed at a subthoracic position. Tumor necrosis factor-α (300 µg) was injected in the perfusate, followed 5 minutes later by melphalan at 1.5 mg/kg. After 30 minutes, the remaining drugs were washed out. Leakage was assessed with technetium Tc 99m radiolabeled human serum albumin, and a pharmacokinetic study was performed. Efficacy was based on the complete response rate observed on magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: Pelvic/systemic ratios of melphalan/TNF/technetium Tc 99m were 14.2/7/3.6. Responses on magnetic resonance imaging were as follows: 30% complete, 30% partial, 19% no change, and 15% progression. Two patients were not evaluable because they did not receive the treatment. Pre-IPP/post-IPP median percentage of necrosis on magnetic resonance imaging was 10%/70%. Median follow-up was 43 months. Median overall survival was 17 months. Twelve-month survival rate, disease-free survival, and local and metastatic recurrence rates were 67%, 30%, 57%, and 26%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated pelvic perfusion with TNF-α compares favorably with historical data, as it was observed in limb perfusion and could provide a chance to translate its successful combination with chemotherapy into treatment of locally advanced pelvic cancers.

Sequential versus combination chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (FFCD 2000-05): an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: The optimum use of cytotoxic drugs for advanced colorectal cancer has not been defined. Our aim was to investigate whether combination treatment is better than the sequential administration of the same drugs in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned patients (1:1 ratio) with advanced, measurable, non-resectable colorectal cancer and WHO performance status 0-2 to receive either first-line treatment with bolus (400 mg/m(2)) and infusional (2400 mg/m(2)) fluorouracil plus leucovorin (400 mg/m(2)) (simplified LV5FU2 regimen), second-line LV5FU2 plus oxaliplatin (100 mg/m(2)) (FOLFOX6), and third-line LV5FU2 plus irinotecan (180 mg/m(2)) (FOLFIRI) or first-line FOLFOX6 and second-line FOLFIRI. Chemotherapy was administered every 2 weeks. Randomisation was done centrally using minimisation (minimisation factors were WHO performance status, previous adjuvant chemotherapy, number of disease sites, and centre). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival after two lines of treatment. Analyses were by intention-to-treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00126256. FINDINGS: 205 patients were randomly assigned to the sequential group and 205 to the combination group. 161 (79%) patients in the sequential group and 161 (79%) in the combination group died during the study. Median progression-free survival after two lines was 10·5 months (95% CI 9·6-11·5) in the sequential group and 10·3 months (9·0-11·9) in the combination group (hazard ratio 0·95, 95% CI 0·77-1·16; p=0·61). All six deaths caused by toxic effects of treatment occurred in the combination group. During first-line chemotherapy, significantly fewer severe (grade 3-4) haematological adverse events (12 events in 203 patients in sequential group vs 83 events in 203 patients in combination group; p<0·0001) and non-haematological adverse events (26 events vs 186 events; p<0·0001) occurred in the sequential group than in the combination group. INTERPRETATION: Upfront combination chemotherapy is more toxic and is not more effective than the sequential use of the same cytotoxic drugs in patients with advanced, non-resectable colorectal cancer. FUNDING: Sanofi-Aventis France.