Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Tumori ; 96(4): 613-7, 2010.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20968143

RESUMEN

[11C]choline positron emission tomograhy can be useful to detect metastatic disease and to localize isolated lymph node relapse after primary treatment in case of prostate-specific antigen failure. In case of lymph node failure in prostate cancer patients, surgery or radiotherapy can be proposed with a curative intent. Some reports have suggested that radiotherapy could have a role in local control of oligometastatic lymph node disease. This is the first reported case of [11C]choline positron emission tomography-guided helical tomotherapy concomitant with estramustine for the treatment of pelvic-recurrent prostate cancer. At 24 months after the end of helical tomotherapy, prostate-specific antigen was undetectable and no late toxicities were recorded. A disease-free survival of 24 months, in the absence of any type of systemic therapy, is uncommon in metastatic prostate cancer. The therapeutic approach of the case report is discussed and a literature review on the issue is presented.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Estramustina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Pélvicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pélvicas/radioterapia , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral , Anciano , Antineoplásicos Alquilantes/uso terapéutico , Radioisótopos de Carbono , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Colina , Humanos , Masculino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pélvicas/secundario , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Urol ; 184(3): 938-43, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20643445

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: We assessed the value of [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography in patients with prostate cancer in whom biochemical failure developed after radical prostatectomy but who showed no disease evidence on conventional imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Considered for this study were 2,124 patients treated with radical prostatectomy who underwent [11C]choline positron emission tomography/computerized tomography to restage disease between December 2004 and January 2007. Study inclusion criteria were 1) previous radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection, 2) increasing prostate specific antigen beyond 0.2 ng/ml after radical prostatectomy, 3) no lymph node disease at radical prostatectomy, 4) no evidence of metastatic disease on conventional imaging, 5) no androgen deprivation therapy and 6) no adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy. These criteria were satisfied in 109 of the 2,124 patients (5%). RESULTS: Median prostate specific antigen at imaging was 0.81 ng/ml (range 0.22 to 16.76 ml). Imaging suggested local recurrence in 4 patients (4%) and pelvic lymph node disease in 8 (7%). Scans were positive in 5%, 15% and 28% of patients with prostate specific antigen less than 1, between 1 and 2, and greater than 2 ng/ml, respectively (p <0.05). Prostate specific antigen was the only significant predictor of tomography results (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Positron emission tomography/computerized tomography detected increased [11C]choline uptake, suggesting recurrent disease in 11% of patients with prostate cancer, increasing prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy and no evidence of disease on conventional imaging. This modality may be useful to restage disease but it cannot be used to guide therapy.


Asunto(s)
Colina/análogos & derivados , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/diagnóstico por imagen , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento
3.
Eur Urol ; 57(4): 551-8, 2010 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20034730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Several guidelines have indicated that in patients with well-differentiated or moderately well-differentiated prostate cancer (PCa), a staging bone scan may be omitted. However, the guidelines recommendations have not yet been externally validated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to externally validate the available guidelines regarding the need for a staging bone scan in patients with newly diagnosed PCa. Moreover, we developed a novel risk stratification tool aimed at improving the accuracy of these guidelines. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included 853 consecutive patients diagnosed with PCa between January 2003 and June 2008 at a single centre. All patients underwent bone scan using technetium Tc 99m methylene diphosphonate at diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS: The area under the curve (AUC) of the criteria suggested by the guidelines (European Association of Urology, American Urological Association, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and American Joint Committee on Cancer) to perform a baseline bone scan was assessed and compared with the accuracy of a classification and regression tree (CART) including prostate-specific antigen (PSA), clinical stage, and biopsy Gleason sum as covariates. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The AUC of the guidelines ranged between 79.7% and 82.6%. However, the novel CART model, which stratified patients into low risk (biopsy Gleason ≤7, cT1-T3, and PSA <10 ng/ml), intermediate risk (biopsy Gleason ≤7, cT2/T3, and PSA >10 ng/ml), and high risk (biopsy Gleason >7) was significantly more accurate (AUC: 88.0%) than all the guidelines (all p≤0.002). The limitation of this study resides in its retrospective design. Moreover, the proposed risk stratification tool can be considered only for patients who are candidates for radical prostatectomy until validated in other clinical settings. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study aimed at externally validating the available guidelines addressing the need for staging baseline bone scans in PCa patients. All guidelines showed high accuracy. However, their accuracy was significantly lower compared with the accuracy of the novel risk stratification tool. According to this tool, staging bone scans might be considered only for patients with a biopsy Gleason score >7 or with a PSA >10 ng/ml and palpable disease (cT2/T3) prior to treatment. However, before recommending its use in clinical practice, our model needs to be externally validated.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Óseas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Óseas/secundario , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Selección de Paciente , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radiofármacos , Medronato de Tecnecio Tc 99m , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Área Bajo la Curva , Biopsia , Neoplasias Óseas/cirugía , Humanos , Italia , Análisis de los Mínimos Cuadrados , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Oportunidad Relativa , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Prostatectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Cintigrafía , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
4.
Neuroreport ; 16(4): 397-401, 2005 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15729145

RESUMEN

Basal ganglia have been implicated in syntactic and phonological processes, but direct evidence has been scarce. Here, we used [11C]raclopride and positron emission tomography to measure modulations of the dopaminergic system induced by phonological or syntactic processing. Two significant effects were found. First, the level of accuracy in phonological processing significantly correlated with tracer binding potential in the left caudate nucleus. Second, the speed in phonological processing significantly correlated with tracer binding potential in the left putamen. Thus, a more accurate and fast phonological processing was associated with a reduced dopamine requirement in the left striatum. These findings show that the striatal dopaminergic system plays an essential role in grammatical processes that form the core of human language.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Ganglios Basales/metabolismo , Dopamina/metabolismo , Lenguaje , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Humanos , Masculino , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones/métodos , Unión Proteica/fisiología , Receptores de Dopamina D2/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA