Combined therapy with 5-aminosalicylic acid tablets and enemas for maintaining remission in ulcerative colitis: a randomized double-blind study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of a combination of oral and topical 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) for the maintenance treatment of ulcerative colitis, we undertook a double-blind randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Patients aged 18 to 65 yr (with disease extent greater than proctitis only) were eligible for inclusion in the study if they met the following criteria: (a) history of two or more relapses in the last year; (b) achievement of remission in the last 3 months (with maintenance of remission for at least 1 month). Patients enrolled in the study were randomly assigned to one of the two following 1-yr treatments: (1) combined therapy with 5-ASA tablets 1.6 g/day and 5-ASA enemas 4 g/100 ml twice weekly; (2) oral therapy with 5-ASA tablets 1.6 g/day and placebo enemas/twice weekly. The main end point of the study was the maintenance of remission at 12 months. RESULTS: Upon completion of the study, relapse occurred in 13 of 33 patients in the combined treatment group versus 23 of 36 patients in the oral treatment group (39 vs 69%; p = 0.036). No significant side effects related to treatment were observed in either group. A simplified pharmacoeconomic analysis shows that this form of combined treatment can have a favorable cost-effectiveness ratio. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that 5-ASA given daily by oral route and intermittently by topical route can be more effective than oral therapy alone. This form of combination treatment can be appropriate for patients at high risk of relapse.

Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil for node-positive breast cancer: a lifetime cost-utility analysis based on a modified Q-TWIST method.

The Q-TWIST (time spent without symptoms and toxicity) method [1-4] and the Gompertz extrapolation method [5-11] are two techniques that have been proposed for evaluating survival in cancer patients. The mathematical basis of the Q-TWIST method relies on estimating the area under the survival curve and partitioning its value into three components with different levels of quality of life (presence of toxicity, presence of symptoms, absence of symptoms and toxicity). The Gompertz approach utilises a curve-fitting procedure to extrapolate the survival curves to infinity. A recent report [12] has described a combined application of the Q-TWIST method and the Gompertz approach ("extrapolated Q-TWIST" method), which allows one to conduct a cost-utility analysis with the calculation of the cost per QALY (quality-adjusted life year) gained. In this paper, we describe a reappraisal of an earlier cost-effectiveness study [7] by application of this extrapolated Q-TWIST method [12]. Our cost-effectiveness study [7] evaluated the pharmacoeconomic profile of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF) in patients with node-positive breast cancer [13] and utilised a Gompertz analysis to estimate lifetime overall survival (OS), which was 862 and 756 discounted years per 100 patients in the CMF and the control groups, respectively. In applying the extrapolated Q-TWIST method to this data set, a second Gompertz analysis is carried out on the disease-free survival (DFS) curve of the two patient groups. Lifetime DFS of Bonadonna's patients can thus be estimated as 741 years in the CMF group and 572 years in the controls (discounted values normalised to 100 patients). Figure 1 shows the two curves of OS and DFS for the CMF group and the partition of the area under the OS curve into its three components. To introduce an assessment of quality of life into these data, the Q-TWIST method partitions the value of OS into the three components called TWIST (absence of symptoms and toxicity), TOX (time spent with toxicity) and REL (survival after relapse). Hence, OS = TWIST + REL + TOX, where REL = OS - DFS. In the control group, TOX = O and TWIST = DFS because no treatment-related toxicity is present.

Cost effectiveness of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.

Recent studies have shown that the analysis of published survival curves allows cost-effectiveness evaluations in which two treatments are compared with each other in terms of cost per life-year saved. In patients with colorectal cancer, the administration of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy (with mitomycin and fluorouracil) has been reported to improve long-term survival in comparison with patients who are not given this treatment. To assess the pharmacoceconomic profile of this adjuvant chemotherapy, we carried out an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis in which we used the Gompertz model to estimate lifetime patient years gained by patients given this chemotherapy in comparison with controls. Using the data of a published controlled long-term trial involving 252 patients treated with intraportal chemotherapy and 253 controls who were given no such therapy, we estimated that the adjuvant treatment improved life expectancy by 89 discounted patient years (or 218 undiscounted patient years) every 100 patients. Cost of chemotherapy was calculated as $107,720 for every 100 patients. On the basis of these data, the administration of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy was found to imply an incremental cost of $1,210 per discounted life-year saved or $494 per undiscounted life-year saved. The cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvant intraportal chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer seems to be particularly favorable in comparison with estimates of cost per life-year saved previously obtained in many other areas of pharmacological intervention. Even though systemic fluorouracil + levamisole is the form of adjuvant chemotherapy most widely used in these patients, intraportal chemotherapy has the best cost-effectiveness profile.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The analysis of published survival curves can be used as the basis for incremental cost-effectiveness analyses in which two treatments are compared with each other in terms of cost per life year saved. In patients with node-positive breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+ methotrexate+fluorouracil has been reported to improve survival in comparison with patients who are not given this treatment. METHODS: To assess the pharmacoeconomic profile of this adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen in terms of cost per life-year gained, we conducted an incremental cost-effectiveness analysis in which the Gompertz model was used to calculate the lifetime estimate of the patient-years gained by treated subjects compared to controls. RESULTS: Using data from a published, controlled long-term trial involving 207 patients treated with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil and 179 controls, we estimated that this adjuvant chemotherapy improved life expectancy by 357 patient-years per 100 subjects. Direct costs, which were almost exclusively related to the administration of chemotherapy, were estimated to be US $159,516 per 100 patients. On the basis of these data, adjuvant chemotherapy was found to imply an incremental cost of US $447 per life-year saved. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness ratio of adjuvant chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide+methotrexate+fluorouracil in patients with node-positive breast cancer seems to be particularly favourable in comparison with estimates of cost per life-year saved previously calculated for other types of pharmacological intervention.

Chronic phospholipid liposomes administration and ovarian function.

In the past years, hypothalamic phospholipids (H-PL) have been used therapeutically for their behavioral effects. The major pharmacological effect of H-PLs is that they increase the turnover rate of biogenic amines in the brain. Previous studies have also shown that a single i.v. dose of H-PL may influence tha plasma levels of gonadotropins, prolactin (PRL) and growth hormone (GH). Since data have not yet been published concerning the effects, if any, of chronic i.m. administration of H-PL on the ovarian function, the present study was undertaken to gain insight into this issue. Four women were studied. Each subject was given H-PLs by i.m. injection from the 5th to the 20th day of the cycle at the dose of 100 mg/day. Blood samples were repeatedly taken over this period to measure the plasma concentrations of FSH, LH, E2, PRL, and progesterone. GH administration, no side-effects were noted in any of the subjects studied. All subjects presented normal plasma levels of FSH, LH, E2, PRL, and progesterone. GH demonstrated some upward fluctuations, which always regressed rapidly. Our findings demonstrate that chronic H-PL administration at therapeutic doses does not influence the ovarian cycle in women. In the light of our data, it appears that different hormonal effects are elicited by a single i.v. high-dose administration of H-PLs as compared with those produced by chronic i.m. treatment at therapeutic doses.