Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Urology ; 115: 8-13, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29409845

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To describe our procedural technique and initial outcomes performing in-office transperineal prostate biopsies using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System (Perineologic, Cumberland, MD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Following institutional review board approval, we retrospectively reviewed the records of men who underwent an in-office transperineal prostate biopsy using the PrecisionPoint device. Records were reviewed for baseline characteristics, biopsy results, and postbiopsy complications. RESULTS: Between January 4, 2017 and August 23, 2017, 43 men underwent an in-office transperineal prostate biopsy using the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System. Patients had a median serum prostate specific antigen level of 6.1 ng/mL (range 0.8-32.9). Of the 43 biopsies, 12 (27.9%) were performed for active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer and 31 (72.1%) were performed for cancer screening. Overall, 21 (48.8%) men were found to have prostate cancer. Among those on active surveillance, cancer was detected in 8 of 12 (66.7%) patients, with 2 of 12 (16.7%) found to have Gleason ≥3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer. Additionally, cancer was detected in 13 of 31 (41.9%) patients undergoing a biopsy for prostate cancer screening, with 5 (16.1%) found to have Gleason ≥3 + 4 = 7 disease. In total, 3 (7.0%) patients experienced a postbiopsy complication: 2 (4.7%) with urinary retention and 1 (2.3%) with gross hematuria requiring catheterization. No patient experienced an infectious complication despite omission of periprocedural antibiotics in all cases. CONCLUSION: The PrecisionPoint device allowed for the successful performance of in-office transperineal prostate biopsies under local anesthesia without the need for periprocedural antibiotics. We observed an acceptable cancer detection rate with no infectious complications.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/instrumentación , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Atención Ambulatoria/métodos , Anestesia Local , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/instrumentación , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Endosonografía , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Visita a Consultorio Médico , Perineo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espera Vigilante/métodos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA