Characterization of human cannabinoid CB2 receptor coupled to chimeric Galpha(qi5) and Galpha(qo5) proteins.

Cannabinoid CB(2) receptors may couple to a variety of G proteins and intracellular effector systems to regulate physiological and pathophysiological processes involved in inflammatory and neuropathic pain. In this study, the coupling of cannabinoid hCB(2) receptors to Galpha(qo5) and Galpha(qi5) proteins was studied and compared by investigating the pharmacological properties of HEK-293 cells co-expressing cannabinoid hCB(2) with chimeric Galpha(qo5) (HEK-hCB(2)-G(qo5)) or Galpha(qi5) (HEK-hCB(2)-G(qi5)). Both cell lines were found to be amendable for measuring cannabinoid CB(2) receptor agonist evoked Ca(2+) mobilization in a high-throughput manner. Comparison of binding affinities of ligands in homogenates prepared from both cell lines revealed similar affinities for [(3)H]CP55,940 displacement with the following rank order: CP55,940 approximately WIN55,212-2 > SR144528 > JWH015approximatelyAM1241approximately AM630 > SR141617A approximately AM251. In comparison at cannabinoid hCB(1) receptors: the rank order was: SR141617A approximately CP55,940 > AM251 > WIN55,212-2 > AM1241approximatelySR144528 > JWH015approximatelyAM630. No significant differences in cannabinoid receptor agonist (CP55,940 approximately WIN55,212-2 > JWH015) or antagonist(SR144528 approximately AM1241 > AM630 > AM251 approximately SR141617A) profiles were observed in HEK-hCB(2)-G(qo5) and HEK-hCB(2)-G(qi5) cells as determined using intracellular Ca(2+) measurements. Experiments with HEK-hCB(2)-G(qi5) cells carried out by investigating interactions among CP55,940, carbachol, thapsigargin, and U73122 revealed that the mechanism of cannabinoid hCB(2) receptor coupling via chimeric G proteins to Ca(2+) mobilization involves phospholipase C-inositol trisphosphate (PLC-IP(3)) and that it is less efficient in comparison to the endogenous muscarinic mediated PLC-IP(3)-Ca(2+) pathway. This study demonstrates that expressed cannabinoid CB(2) receptors couple equally well to Galpha(qo5) and Galpha(qi5) proteins and that receptor agonist or antagonist pharmacology is not influenced by the nature of these coupled G proteins when heterologously expressed.

Indol-3-yl-tetramethylcyclopropyl ketones: effects of indole ring substitution on CB2 cannabinoid receptor activity.

A series of potent indol-3-yl-tetramethylcyclopropyl ketones have been prepared as CB 2 cannabinoid receptor ligands. Two unsubstituted indoles ( 5, 32) were the starting points for an investigation of the effect of indole ring substitutions on CB 2 and CB 1 binding affinities and activity in a CB 2 in vitro functional assay. Indole ring substitutions had varying effects on CB 2 and CB 1 binding, but were generally detrimental to agonist activity. Substitution on the indole ring did lead to improved CB 2/CB 1 binding selectivity in some cases (i.e., 7- 9, 15- 20). All indoles with the morpholino-ethyl side chain ( 32- 43) exhibited weaker binding affinity and less agonist activity relative to that of their tetrahydropyranyl-methyl analogs ( 5- 31). Several agonists were active in the complete Freund's adjuvant model of chronic inflammatory thermal hyperalgesia ( 32, 15).

Peripheral and central sites of action for A-85380 in the spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain.

Neuronal nicotinic receptor (NNR) agonists such as ABT 594 have been shown to be effective in a wide range of preclinical models of acute and neuropathic pain. The present study, using the NNR agonist A-85380, sought to determine if NNR agonists are acting via similar or differing mechanisms to induce anti-nociception and anti-allodynia. A systemic administration of the quaternary NNR antagonist chlorisondamine (0.4 micromol/kg, intraperitoneal (i.p.)) did not alter A-85380-induced (0.75 micromol/kg, i.p.) anti-nociception in the rat paw withdrawal model of acute thermal pain. In contrast, previous studies have demonstrated that blockade of central NNRs by prior administration of chlorisondamine (10 microg i.c.v.) prevents A-85380 induced anti-nociception indicating a predominantly central site of action of NNR agonists in relieving acute pain. In the rat spinal nerve ligation model of neuropathic pain, A-85380 induced a dose-dependent anti-allodynia (0.5-1.0 micromol/kg) that was blocked by pretreatment with mecamylamine (1 micromol/kg). Interestingly, unlike acute pain, both systemic and central administration of chlorisondamine blocked A-85380-induced anti-allodynia, an effect that was determined not to be due to a non-specific effect of chlorisondamine or to chlorisondamine crossing the blood-brain barrier. The peripheral site of action was shown not to be the primary receptive field, since A-85380 had equally potent anti-allodynic effects when it was injected into either the affected or unaffected paw. In contrast, infusion of A-85380 directly onto the L5 dorsal root ganglion on the affected side resulted in a dose-dependent and marked anti-allodynia (10-20 microg) at doses that had no effect when injected systemically. This effect was blocked by pretreatment with chlorisondamine. Together these data further support the idea that different mechanisms underlie different pain states and suggest that the effects of NNR agonists in neuropathic pain may be due in part to peripheral actions of the compounds.