Ventricular substrate identification using close-coupled paced electrogram feature analysis.

AIMS: Substrate based catheter ablation strategies are widely employed for treatment of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). We analysed intracardiac electrograms (EGMs) from close-coupled paced extrastimuli extracted from the EnSite Precision mapping system. We sought to characterize EGM responses of ventricular myocardium to varying coupling intervals from the right ventricular apex (RVA) in both healthy individuals and patients presenting with VT for catheter ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: Extrastimuli were delivered from the RVA after estimation of the ventricular effective refractory period. Electrograms were recorded from high-density mapping catheters in the left ventricle and exported for analysis to MATLAB. Observational data were collected from 14 patients with ischaemic VT (mean age 72.4 ± 6.3 years, one female) and five controls (mean age 59.4 ± 7.4 years, one female). These derived data were used to inform an interventional strategy on a further 10 patients (mean age 64.7 ± 10.0 years; two female). Significant differences were observed in EGM duration (ED) and latency (LT) at all coupling intervals between VT patients and controls. Significant increases in ED and LT with decreased RVA coupling interval were observed at VT isthmuses. Abnormal responses derived from control subject data were used to classify four types of ventricular EGM response. Targeting sites with abnormal LT and ED significantly reduced VT inducibility (5/14 derivation patients to 0/10 intervention patients; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Paced electrogram feature analysis is a novel tool to characterize the ischaemic substrate. Association with VT isthmuses and early ablation results suggest a possible role in substrate ablation for ischaemic VT.

Unipolar voltage threshold of 5.0 mV is optimal to localize critical isthmuses in post-infarction patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar voltage mapping is useful to delineate post-infarct endocardial scar and guide ablation of ischemic VT. The role of unipolar mapping is not yet well defined. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between electrophysiological findings in patients with ischemic VT and unipolar voltage maps using different cut-offs. METHODS: We included 10 patients (age 67 ± 7 years, ejection fraction 33 ± 10%) with ischemic cardiomyopathy undergoing catheter ablation for recurrent VT. Patients with right-sided VTs were excluded. In all patients a unipolar voltage map was constructed during right ventricular pacing. Ablation was performed guided by activation and entrainment mapping in hemodynamically stable VTs and by pace-mapping and abnormal (late/split/fractionated) potentials in unstable VTs. Subsequently, the unipolar voltage maps were analyzed off-line using cutoffs from 1.0 to 8.0 mV and correlated with the isthmus sites. RESULTS: A total of 17 sustained VTs were induced in the 10 patients and non-inducibility of the clinical VT was achieved in 90% of patients by endocardial ablation. The optimal cutoff was 5.0 mV. By using this value, the mean surface area of abnormal unipolar voltage was 43.8% and 95% of all VT isthmuses were located within the area of scar, as well as 81% of abnormal potentials. In addition, 71% of isthmuses were at less than 1cm from the scar border. CONCLUSION: Unipolar voltage mapping showed good correlation with areas of isthmuses and abnormal electrograms in patients with scar-related VT, with a cut-off of 5.0 mV allowing the best delineation of ablation targets.

Validation of a novel algorithm for quantification of the percentage of signal fractionation in atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: Catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is rapidly becoming a standard practice. There is literature to support that catheter ablation of persistent AF requires additional 'substrate modification'. In clinical practice, operators rely on automated fractionation maps created by three-dimensional anatomic mapping systems to rapidly assess complex 'fractionated' signals (CFAE). These systems use differing algorithms to automate the process. The agreement between operators and contemporary algorithms has not been examined. We sought to assess the agreement between operators and a novel method of quantification calculating percentage fractionation (PF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Expert opinion on 80 atrial electrogram 4 s signals of varying levels of activity were gathered and pooled for comparison. Twelve independent experts visually quantified the signal fractionation and offered a threshold level for ablation. We developed an algorithm to find sites with high continuous electrical activity, or high PF. Correlation between experts and PF was 0.78 [P < 0.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.68-0.86)]. Receiver operating characteristics curve sensitivity and specificity for PF were 0.7727 and 0.8103 at the optimal cut-off point of 58.45 PF with area under curve 0.89 CI (0.80-0.99). CONCLUSION: The PF statistic represents a more robust and intuitive measure to represent fractionated atrial activity; importantly it demonstrates excellent agreement with expert users and presents a new standard for algorithm assessment. Use of a PF statistic should be considered in automated mapping systems.

The right ventricular septum presents the optimum site for maximal electrical separation during left ventricular pacing.

UNLABELLED: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) benefits selected heart failure (HF) patients. The optimal placement of the right ventricle (RV) lead during biventricular pacing has not been assessed. Greater electrical separation (ES) between left ventricle (LV) and RV leads has been associated with better clinical outcomes. The site of maximal electrical separation(MES) in the RV is unknown. METHODS: Prospective study of 50 CRT patients. The LV lead was placed in a postero-lateral branch of the coronary sinus. ES was recorded at 6 sites within the RV during LV pacing at 600 milliseconds cycle length (CL). The median ES was recorded with a roving deflectable catheter at the RV outflow tract (RVOT), high septum, inflow septum, mid-septum, apical septum and apex. RESULTS: Mean age was 67 ± 7 years, 39 were male (78%). Thirty had ischemic etiology (60%). Mean left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was 25 ± 7%, QRS duration pre and post was 165 ± 26 milliseconds and 138.5 ± 15.6 milliseconds (P < 0.001). Mapping ES showed a difference between 20 and 50 milliseconds distributed across the RV in the majority of patients (40/49). However, 7 subjects demonstrated delay distribution of between 50 and 82 milliseconds. ES was significant greater in the RV mid-septum (161.2 ± 23.7 milliseconds) compared with RVOT (154.1 ± 20.8 milliseconds) and apex (148.0 ± 25.5 milliseconds; P < 0.001). The site of Maximal ES was most commonly found at the mid-septum (40 patients, 80%) and only rarely at the RVOT (5, 10%) and apex (5, 10%; P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: MES was observed most commonly at the RV septum and rarely at the RV apex. Better correction of electrical and mechanical dyssynchrony by CRT may be achieved by placing the RV lead in a site outside of the apex in the majority of patients. Clinical studies exploring RV septal pacing in CRT seem warranted.