[Results of sacral neuromodulation on the urinary and fecal incontinence and sexuality in 20 women suffering from a double incontinence]. / Résultats de la neuromodulation des racines sacrées sur la continence et la sexualité dans une cohorte de 20 patientes ayant une double incontinence.

CONTEXT: Urinary and faecal incontinence (defining double incontinence) are common conditions, which are frequently associated and can altered sexuality. The effectiveness of the sacral nerve modulation (NMS) in the treatment of the urge urinary incontinence, faecal incontinence and double incontinence was shown. OBJECTIVE: The present article aims to determine the impact of SNM on female sexual function in twenty women suffering from a double incontinence. METHODS: All patients who received sacral neuromodulation for urge urinary and/or faecal incontinence between 2005 and 2010 and who still had the implant were included. Only 20 sexually active patients suffering from double incontinence were considered eligible. They completed a questionnaire on follow-up examinations. RESULTS: The initial indication of NMS was the urge urinary incontinence for 15 patients and the faecal incontinence for five patients. Ten patients (50%) were improved on two incontinence. All patients preserved sexual activity after the treatment of NMS. NMS improves the quality of sexual activity in 45% patients. The numbers of urinary and faecal episodes of incontinence are decreased respectively for 50% and 15% patients during sexual activity. The quality of sexual's life and orgasm score are significantly increased in the group of patients improved on the DI. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the effectiveness of NMS in the treatment of double incontinence which half patients are improved on the two incontinence. This study shows that improvement of urinary or faecal incontinence could have a positive impact on sexuality of these patients, especially for patients improved double incontinence. It is difficult to know if these results are related to its direct action on the neurological ways of sexual function or on its benefit on the continence.

How sacral nerve stimulation works in patients with faecal incontinence.

AIM: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) reduces incontinence episodes and improves the quality of life of patients treated for faecal incontinence. However, the exact mechanism of action of this technique remains unclear. The present article reviews the pertinent neuroanatomy and neurophysiology related to SNS and provides explanations for potential mechanisms of action. METHOD: A systematic review of the literature was performed for studies of the potential mechanisms of action of SNS, using MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library. Articles dealing with the technique, adverse events and economic evaluations of SNS, as well as literature reviews, were excluded, except for reviews dealing with the mechanisms of action of SNS. The following inclusion criteria were used to select articles: (i) articles in English, (ii) randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled studies, and (iii) cohort studies. Case-control studies or retrospective studies were cited only when randomized or cohort studies could not be found. RESULTS: We propose three hypotheses to explain the mechanism of action of SNS: (i) a somato-visceral reflex, (ii) a modulation of the perception of afferent information, and (iii) an increase in external anal sphincter activity. CONCLUSION: The mechanism of action of SNS in patients with faecal incontinence almost certainly depends on the modulation of spinal and/or supraspinal afferent inputs. Further research on humans and animals will be required to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms of action of SNS.

Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: results of trial stimulation in 200 patients.

AIM: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has a place in the treatment algorithm for faecal incontinence (FI). However, after implantation, 15-30% of patients with FI fail to respond for unknown reasons. We investigated the effect of SNS on continence and quality of life (QOL) and tried to identify specific predictive factors of the success of permanent SNS in the treatment of FI. METHOD: Two hundred consecutive patients (six men; median age = 60; range 16-81) underwent permanent implantation for FI. The severity of FI was evaluated by the Cleveland Clinic Score. Quality of life was evaluated by the French version of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) quality of life questionnaire (FIQL). All patients underwent a preoperative evaluation. After permanent implantation, severity and QOL scores were reevaluated after six and 12 months and then once a year. RESULTS: The severity scores were significantly reduced during SNS (P = 0.001). QOL improved in all domains. At the 6-month follow-up, the clinical outcome of the permanent implant was not affected by age, gender, duration of symptoms, QOL, main causes of FI, anorectal manometry or endoanal ultrasound results. Only loose stool consistency (P = 0.01), persistent FI even though diarrhoea was controlled by medical treatment (P = 0.004), and low stimulation intensity (P = 0.02) were associated with improved short-term outcomes. Multivariate analysis confirmed that loose stool consistency and low stimulation intensity were related to a favourable outcome. CONCLUSION: Stool consistency and low stimulation intensity have been identified as predictive factors for the short-term outcome of SNS.

Sacral nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence: position statement based on a collective experience.

OBJECTIVE: Since the first paper published by Matzel et al., in 1995, on the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) in patients with faecal incontinence, the indications, the contraindications, the stimulation technique and follow up of implanted patients have changed. The aim of this article was to provide a consensus opinion on the management of patients with faecal incontinence treated with SNS. METHOD: Recommendations were based on a critical review of the literature when available and on expert opinions in areas with insufficient evidence. RESULTS: We have reviewed the indications and contraindications, proposed an algorithm for patient management showing the place of SNS. The temporary test technique, the implantation technique, the patient follow up and the approach in case of treatment failure were discussed. CONCLUSION: We hope not only to provide a guide on patient management to clinical practitioners interested in SNS but also to harmonize our practices.

Does magnetic stimulation of sacral nerve roots modify colonic motility? Results of a randomized double-blind sham-controlled study.

Although sacral nerve root stimulation (SNS) can result in a symptomatic improvement of faecal incontinence, the mechanism of action remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess whether short-term magnetic SNS can inhibit pharmacologically induced propulsive colonic contractions. Twelve healthy volunteers (median age: 43.5 years old) were studied on two separate occasions and randomized into either active (15 Hz, 100% output intensity for 5 s min(-1) for 30 min) or sham rapid rate lumbosacral magnetic stimulation (rLSMS). Colorectal motility was recorded with a manometric catheter located at the most proximal transducer in the left colon and the most distal, in the rectum. Colonic contractions were provoked by instilling Bisacodyl. The effects of rLSMS on colonic, sigmoid and rectal contractions were monitored and recorded after Bisacodyl instillation. The appearance of high-amplitude contractions propagated or not (HAC/HAPC) provoked by Bisacodyl instillation was significantly delayed during active compared to sham stimulation (P = 0.03). There was no difference in the characteristics of HAC/HAPC (i.e. frequency, amplitude, duration, velocity of propagation) or the motility index with active or sham stimulation. The perception of urgency tended to be decreased with rLSMS following Bisacodyl instillation. The catheter was expulsed within a median of 16.5 min (range 8-39) after Bisacodyl administration during active stimulation compared to 14 min (range 5-40) during sham stimulation (P = 0.03). This study suggests that rLSMS could delay the appearance of the first Bisacodyl-induced colonic contractions.

Effect of sacral nerve stimulation in patients with fecal and urinary incontinence.

PURPOSE: Preliminary studies have shown improvement in fecal incontinence in several patients who received temporary or permanent stimulation. The purpose of this study was to report our experience in sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence and to target patients who would benefit most from stimulation. METHODS: Patients with fecal incontinence were studied clinically and manometrically before, during, and after temporary nerve stimulation. If temporary nerve stimulation was clinically successful, the patient was implanted and followed up for six months. RESULTS: Nine patients (6 female) with a mean age of 50.7 +/- 12.3 years underwent temporary nerve stimulation. Temporary nerve stimulation was successful in eight patients, six of whom were implanted. Of the patients who could be evaluated, three of five had improved at the six-month follow-up visit, particularly in relation to the number of urgency episodes and delay in postponing defecation. All implanted patients had urinary symptoms. Urinary urgency was also improved by stimulation. During temporary nerve stimulation, the maximal squeeze pressure amplitude increased. After implantation, only the duration of maximal squeeze pressure seemed to improve. CONCLUSION: Sacral nerve stimulation can be used in the management of fecal incontinence, particularly in cases of urge fecal incontinence associated with urinary urgency. This study seems to confirm the effect of sacral nerve stimulation on striated sphincter function.