Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int J Clin Exp Pathol ; 7(12): 9061-6, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25674288

RESUMEN

Neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation in prostate carcinomas can be seen in two settings: as a focal finding in conventional acinar adenocarcinoma, identifiable by immunohistochemical staining, or as a primary NE tumor of the prostate gland, such as carcinoid, small cell carcinoma, or large cell NE carcinoma. Of particular interest is the large cell NE carcinoma, which had been previously reported in isolated cases or in limited case series. In this report, we describe a case of a large cell NE carcinoma diagnosed in a 48-year-old man who presented with difficulty in voiding and urine retention. A cystoscopy revealed an enlarged, elongated prostate with an intra-urethral obstructing mass in the prostatic urethra. Subsequently, a transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) was performed at an outside hospital under the clinical diagnosis of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Microscopic examination of the TURP specimen revealed several foci of low-grade transitional-zone-type adenocarcinoma corresponding to Gleason score 5 (3 + 2), and a focus of high-grade large cell NE carcinoma. Concurrent x-ray computed tomography scans of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis demonstrated an enlarged left pelvic lymph node, which was biopsied and the patient was diagnosed with metastatic large cell NE carcinoma. He subsequently underwent 8 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Lupron, a laparoscopic robotic-assisted radical retropubic prostatectomy, and pelvic lymphadenectomy. He died of widely metastatic prostatic carcinoma with leptomeningeal metastases 13 months after radical prostatectomy. Here, we present a rare case of large cell NE carcinoma with a review of the published literature.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Grandes/secundario , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/secundario , Neoplasias Meníngeas/secundario , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Biopsia , Carcinoma de Células Grandes/química , Carcinoma de Células Grandes/cirugía , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/química , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cistoscopía , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Resultado Fatal , Humanos , Inmunohistoquímica , Laparoscopía/métodos , Leuprolida/administración & dosificación , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Clasificación del Tumor , Paclitaxel/administración & dosificación , Pelvis , Neoplasias de la Próstata/química , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resección Transuretral de la Próstata/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 12(7 Pt 1): 2178-84, 2006 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16609032

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Epidemiologic and clinical data suggest that selenium could prevent prostate cancer, but it has not been shown that supplemental selenium leads to an increased concentration of selenium in prostate tissue compared with adjacent tissue. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We conducted a randomized, controlled, short-term trial of l-selenomethionine (SeMet) versus observation in men with organ-confined prostate cancer. The primary endpoint was the measurement of selenium concentration in prostate tissue and seminal vesicle (SV). We assessed baseline selenium levels in serum and in toenail specimens (reflecting long-term intake) and post-intervention selenium levels in serum, and in prostate and SV tissues using hydride generation atomic fluorescence spectroscopy. RESULTS: Sixty-six eligible patients were randomly assigned to the SeMet (n = 34) or observation (n = 32) arm; both arms had similar baseline patient characteristics. Baseline serum selenium was similar in the two groups (P = 0.64). Baseline toenail selenium levels were slightly higher in the SeMet group than in the control group (P = 0.07). After the intervention, the mean serum selenium level increased 15% in the SeMet arm and was higher than in the observation arm (P = 0.001). The selenium concentration in prostate tissue was 22% higher in the SeMet arm (n = 26) than in the observation arm (n = 25; 1.80 versus 1.47 ppm; P = 0.003, Wilcoxon rank sum test) and remained significantly higher after adjusting for chronic selenium intake (P = 0.021, ANCOVA). SV selenium concentration was similar in both groups (P = 0.384) and was lower than in prostate tissue. CONCLUSIONS: The present study is the first to show that selenium taken as oral supplementation accumulates preferentially in the human prostate gland as opposed to the SV. These findings support the hypothesis that oral selenium supplementation may contribute to the cancer preventive effects of selenium.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Selenio/metabolismo , Selenometionina/farmacocinética , Administración Oral , Adulto , Anciano , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Próstata/química , Próstata/cirugía , Prostatectomía/métodos , Selenio/análisis , Selenometionina/administración & dosificación , Vesículas Seminales/química , Vesículas Seminales/metabolismo , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Espectrometría de Fluorescencia/métodos , Factores de Tiempo , Distribución Tisular
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA