Models and Approaches Describing the Metabolism, Transport, and Toxicity of Drugs Administered by the Ocular Route.

The eye is a complex organ with a series of anatomic barriers that provide protection from physical and chemical injury while maintaining homeostasis and function. The physiology of the eye is multifaceted, with dynamic flows and clearance mechanisms. This review highlights that in vitro ocular transport and metabolism models are confined by the availability of clinically relevant absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) data. In vitro ocular transport models used for pharmacology and toxicity poorly predict ocular exposure. Although ocular cell lines cannot replicate in vivo conditions, these models can help rank-order new chemical entities in discovery. Historic ocular metabolism of small molecules was assumed to be inconsequential or assessed using authentic standards. While various in vitro models have been cited, no single system is perfect, and many must be used in combination. Several studies document the use of laboratory animals for the prediction of ocular pharmacokinetics in humans. This review focuses on the use of human-relevant and human-derived models which can be utilized in discovery and development to understand ocular disposition of new chemical entities. The benefits and caveats of each model are discussed. Furthermore, ADME case studies are summarized retrospectively and capture the ADME data collected for health authorities in the absence of definitive guidelines. Finally, we discuss the novel technologies and a hypothesis-driven ocular drug classification system to provide a holistic perspective on the ADME properties of drugs administered by the ocular route.

Current strategies in the non-clinical safety assessment of biologics: New targets, new molecules, new challenges.

Nonclinical safety testing of biopharmaceuticals can present significant challenges to human risk assessment with these innovative and often complex drugs. Emerging topics in this field were discussed recently at the 2016 Annual US BioSafe General Membership meeting. The presentations and subsequent discussions from the main sessions are summarized. The topics covered included: (i) specialty biologics (oncolytic virus, gene therapy, and gene editing-based technologies), (ii) the value of non-human primates (NHPs) for safety assessment, (iii) challenges in the safety assessment of immuno-oncology drugs (T cell-dependent bispecifics, checkpoint inhibitors, and costimulatory agonists), (iv) emerging therapeutic approaches and modalities focused on microbiome, oligonucleotide, messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) therapeutics, (v) first in human (FIH) dose selection and the minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL), (vi) an update on current regulatory guidelines, International Council for Harmonization (ICH) S1, S3a, S5, S9 and S11 and (vii) breakout sessions that focused on bioanalytical and PK/PD challenges with bispecific antibodies, cytokine release in nonclinical studies, determining adversity and NOAEL for biologics, the value of second species for toxicology assessment and what to do if there is no relevant toxicology species.

Inflammation and immunogenicity limit the utility of the rabbit as a nonclinical species for ocular biologic therapeutics.

The nonclinical safety evaluation of therapeutic drug candidates is commonly conducted in two species (rodent and non-rodent) in keeping with international health authority guidance. Biologic drugs typically have restricted species cross-reactivity, necessitating the evaluation of safety in non-human primates and thus limiting the utility of lower order species. Safety studies of cross-reactive ocular biologic drug candidates have been conducted in rabbits as a second toxicology species, despite the fact that rabbits are not a rodent species. Such studies are often confounded by the development of anti-drug antibodies and severe ocular inflammation, the latter requiring studies to be terminated prematurely for animal welfare reasons. Notably, these confounding factors preclude the interpretation of safety. Nonclinical toxicology programs should be designed with consideration of ethical animal use and 3Rs principles (Replacement, Reduction and Refinement). The experience of several pharmaceutical sponsors, demonstrating that toxicology studies of ocular (intravitreal and topical ocular) biologic drug candidates in the rabbit are of limited interpretive value, calls into question the utility of such studies in this species and indicates that such studies should not be conducted.

Nonclinical safety testing of biopharmaceuticals--Addressing current challenges of these novel and emerging therapies.

Non-clinical safety testing of biopharmaceuticals can present significant challenges to human risk assessment with these often innovative and complex drugs. Hot Topics in this field were discussed recently at the 4th Annual European Biosafe General Membership meeting. In this feature article, the presentations and subsequent discussions from the main sessions are summarized. The topics covered include: (i) wanted versus unwanted immune activation, (ii) bi-specific protein scaffolds, (iii) use of Pharmacokinetic (PK)/Pharmacodynamic (PD) data to impact/optimize toxicology study design, (iv) cytokine release and challenges to human translation (v) safety testing of cell and gene therapies including chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells and retroviral vectors and (vi) biopharmaceutical development strategies encompassing a range of diverse topics including optimizing entry of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) into the brain, safety testing of therapeutic vaccines, non-clinical testing of biosimilars, infection in toxicology studies with immunomodulators and challenges to human risk assessment, maternal and infant anti-drug antibody (ADA) development and impact in non-human primate (NHP) developmental toxicity studies, and a summary of an NC3Rs workshop on the future vision for non-clinical safety assessment of biopharmaceuticals.

The minimum anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) for selection of first human dose in clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies.

Dose selection for first-in-human (FIH) clinical trials with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is based on specifically designed preclinical pharmacology and toxicology studies, mechanistic ex vivo/in vitro investigations with human and animal cells and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling approaches and requires a thorough understanding of the biology of the target and the relative binding and pharmacological activity of the mAb in animals and humans. These investigations provide the essential information required for the selection of a safe starting dose and escalation for FIH trials based on toxicology and pharmacology data and the minimal anticipated biological effect level (MABEL) by integrating all available in vivo and in vitro data. In this review, strategies for estimation of the MABEL for mAbs specific for both membrane and soluble targets are presented and the scientific and regulatory challenges highlighted.

Evaluation of drug-transporter interactions using in vitro and in vivo models.

Drug transporters, including efflux transporters (the ATP binding cassette (ABC) proteins) and uptake transporters (the solute carrier proteins (SLC)), have an important impact on drug disposition, efficacy, drug-drug interactions and toxicity. Identification of the interactions of chemical scaffolds with transporters at the early stages of drug development can assist in the optimization and selection of new drug candidates. In this review, we discuss current in vitro and in vivo models used to investigate the interactions between drugs and transporters such as P-gp, MRP, BCRP, BSEP, OAT, OATP, OCT, NTCP, PEPT1/2 and NT. In vitro models including cell-based, cell-free, and yeast systems as well as in vivo models such as genetic knockout, gene deficient and chemical knockout animals are discussed and compared. The applications, throughput, advantages and limitations of each model are also addressed in this review.